Table A.1.

Quality assessment of included papers.

Study	Selection	Ascertainment		Causality		Reporting
	a. Does the patient(s) represent(s) the whole experience of the investigator (center) or is the selection method unclear to the extent that other patients with similar presentation may not have been reported?	b. Was the exposure adequately ascertained?	c. Was the outcome adequately ascertained?	d. Were other alternative causes that may explain the observation ruled out?	e. Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur?	f. Is the case(s) described with sufficient details to allow other investigators to replicate the research or to allow practitioners make inferences related to their own practice?	Total Score
Abdi et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	5
Abdel-Mannan et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	NO	4
Assunção et al., 2020	YES	NO	YES	NO	NO	NO	2
De Miranda Henriques-Souza et al., 2021	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	5
Dominguez-Rojas et al., 2020	YES	NO	YES	YES	NO	YES	4
El Beltagi et al., 2021	YES	YES	YES	NO	NO	NO	3
Espíndola et al., 2021	NO	YES	NO	YES	NO	NO	2
Freire-Álvarez et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	5
Kumar et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	5
Langley et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	NO	NO	YES	4
Lindan et al., 2020	YES	NO	YES	NO	NO	NO	2
Lopes et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	NO	NO	NO	3
McCuddy et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	5
Parsons et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	5
Paterson et al., 2020	NO	NO	NO	YES	NO	NO	1
Pilotto et al., 2021	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	NO	4
Umapathi et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	5
Utukuri et al., 2020	YES	YES	YES	YES	NO	YES	5
Present Case	YES	NO	YES	YES	NO	YES	4