Table 3.
Results of the base case analysis
| Costs (€) | Hip fractures (re-fractures)b | Admissions to nursing homeb | ICER (€/avoided hip fracture) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | |||||
| FPE |
31,829 − Intervention: − Fracture treatmenta: − Long-term care: |
268 2,153 29,408 |
0.1888 (0.0394) | 0.0405 | |
| No FPE |
31,682 − Fracture treatmenta: − Long-term care: |
2,193 29,489 |
0.1916 (0.0401) | 0.0407 | |
| Δ | 148 | 0.0028 | 0.0002 | ||
| 52,864 | |||||
| Men | |||||
| FPE |
16,986 − Intervention: − Fracture treatmenta: − Long-term care: |
266 822 15,898 |
0.0716 (0.0066) | 0.0114 | |
| No FPE |
16,758 − Fracture treatmenta: − Long-term care: |
842 15,916 |
0.0729 (0.0067) | 0.0115 | |
| Δ | 228 | 0.0013 | 0.0001 | ||
| 169,805 | |||||
aHip fracture treatment includes hospital treatment, revision, rehabilitation and outpatient care
bValues are proportion
Abbreviations. FPE Fall-prevention exercise, Δ Difference between FPE and no FPE, ICER Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio