Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Dev. 2020 Jul 15;30(1):311–328. doi: 10.1111/sode.12474

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics of Study Variables for Treatment and Control Groups

Variable Age(s) n Mean (SD)
FCU Control FCU Control

Positive Behavior Support 2 317 313 −.04 (.62) .00 (.00)
3 317 313 .07 (.81) .00 (.00)
Extracurricular involvement 7.5, 8.5, 9.5 281 288 2.43 (1.31) 2.29 (1.38)
Externalizing problems 2 317 312 20.65 (7.35) 20.49 (6.95)
Household income 2 1 313 309 $20,014 ($11,147) $19,594 ($12,062)
7.5, 8.5, 9.5 280 286 $28,440 ($17,782) $28,492 ($15,362)

Variable Group n (%)
FCU Control

Study site Charlottesville, VA 85 (27%) 83 (27%)
Eugene, OR 116 (37%) 114 (36%)
Pittsburgh, PA 116 (37%) 116 (37%)
Child race White 157 (50%) 157 (50%)
Black/African American 89 (28%) 85 (27%)
Biracial 43 (14%) 44 (14%)
Other 24 (8%) 25 (8%)
Child ethnicity Hispanic/Latinx 44 (14%) 42 (13%)
Not Hispanic/Latinx 263 (84%) 266 (85%)
Unknown 8 (3%) 5 (2%)
Maternal education (age 2) Did not complete high school 69 (22%) 77 (25%)
High school or GED 141 (45%) 118 (38%)
Partial college/special training 71 (22%) 84 (27%)
2- or 4-year college degree 36 (11%) 34 (11%)

Note. All differences between the FCU and control groups on study variables were not significant.

1

Age 2 household income was estimated based on a .5 to 10 coding scale, where .5 represented ≤ $4999 and 10 represented ≥ $90,000. A 1-point increase in household income represented a $9999 increase in annual income.