Table 3.
Linear probability models; outcome “serious considerations to quit” (no = 0, yes = 1)
| Model 1 – unadjusted | Model 2 – fully adjusteda | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 95 %CI | p-val | B | 95 %CI | p-val | |
| Recognition by top municipal officials/politicians | ||||||
| Very/quite much valued (ref.) | ||||||
| Not much valued | 0.156 | 0.089/0.223 | < 0.001 | 0.088 | 0.025/0.151 | 0.006 |
| Not at all valued | 0.354 | 0.289/0.420 | < 0.001 | 0.194 | 0.131/0.257 | < 0.001 |
| Don’t know | 0.160 | 0.093/0.227 | < 0.001 | 0.106 | 0.043/0.169 | 0.001 |
| Constant | 0.230 | 0.318 | ||||
| Adjusted R square | 0.052 | 0.201 | ||||
| N | 2,645 | 2,645 | ||||
| Recognition by mass media | ||||||
| Very/quite much valued (ref.) | ||||||
| Not much valued | 0.077 | 0.024/0.129 | 0.004 | 0.019 | -0.029/0.068 | 0.437 |
| Not at all valued | 0.230 | 0.176/0.285 | < 0.001 | 0.083 | 0.032/0.134 | 0.001 |
| Don’t know | 0.051 | -0.003/0.105 | 0.064 | 0.037 | -0.013/0.087 | 0.146 |
| Constant | 0.310 | 0.355 | ||||
| Adjusted R square | 0.027 | 0.186 | ||||
| N | 3,527 | 3,527 | ||||
| Recognition by general public | ||||||
| Very/quite much valued (ref.) | ||||||
| Not much valued | 0.107 | 0.068/0.146 | < 0.001 | 0.032 | -0.005/0.062 | 0.092 |
| Not at all valued | 0.261 | 0.208/0.314 | < 0.001 | 0.091 | 0.037/0.142 | 0.001 |
| Don’t know | 0.067 | 0.022/0.112 | 0.003 | 0.052 | 0.010/0.094 | 0.015 |
| Constant | 0.329 | 0.357 | ||||
| Adjusted R square | 0.026 | 0.186 | ||||
| N | 3,527 | 3,527 | ||||
B = unstandardised regression coefficient, 95 %CI = 95 % confidence interval, bold coefficients = p-value < 0.01
aAdjusted for recognition at one’s workplace, country, gender, age, immigrant status, general education, care education, work experience, financial strain, work-life balance, distressing working conditions (index constructed with 8 items), harassment at work (4 items), and self-rated health (see Appendix Table 2 for control variable coefficients)