Table 3.
The questionnaire asked whether and how the Circeo National Park have impacted survey respondents’ well-being. Here we resume the main reasons for respondents (7%) who defined the presence of the park as negative for their life and activity
Reasons for the negative impact | % |
---|---|
Limitations for production activities and economic development | 37.6 |
Inefficiency of Park Authority | 20.8 |
High bureaucracy for permissions (ex: tree cutting) | 19.4 |
Sense of prohibition and not protection | 18.5 |
No maintenance (fences, roots, trees, drains, paths, walkways, etc.) | 15.0 |
Limitations to urbanization | 14.4 |
Privatization of Paola Lake | 5.9 |
Inability of Park Authority to enforce regulations (ex: illegal cut and waste in the park area) | 3.9 |
No animals control | 3.6 |
No answer | 19.0 |