Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 21;17(1):411–431. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155

Table 3.

The questionnaire asked whether and how the Circeo National Park have impacted survey respondents’ well-being. Here we resume the main reasons for respondents (7%) who defined the presence of the park as negative for their life and activity

Reasons for the negative impact %
Limitations for production activities and economic development 37.6
Inefficiency of Park Authority 20.8
High bureaucracy for permissions (ex: tree cutting) 19.4
Sense of prohibition and not protection 18.5
No maintenance (fences, roots, trees, drains, paths, walkways, etc.) 15.0
Limitations to urbanization 14.4
Privatization of Paola Lake 5.9
Inability of Park Authority to enforce regulations (ex: illegal cut and waste in the park area) 3.9
No animals control 3.6
No answer 19.0