Table 2.

Differences in Sexual Orientation Response Option Endorsements based on SBHC status and gender.

Sexual orientation responses	Total sample N = 13,448	SBHC schools n = 4,022	Non-SBHC schools n = 9,426	Effect size (Cohen’s d)
“Straight”, n (%)	11947 (88.7)	3556 (88.8)	8391 (88.7)	−0.004
“Lesbian or gay”, n (%)	199 (1.4)	58 (1.4)	141 (1.4)	−0.0001
“Bisexual”, n (%)	700 (5.3)	219 (4.9)	481 (5.4)*	0.01
“Something else”, n (%)	267 (1.8)	81 (2.0)	186 (1.7)	−0.01
“Don’t know/not sure”, n (%)	335 (2.9)	108 (3.0)	227 (2.8)	−0.01
Sexual orientation responses	Total sample N = 13,448	Male n = 6,723	Female n = 6,725	Effect size (Cohen’s d)
“Straight”, n (%)	11947 (88.7)	6213 (92.0)	5734 (85.5)***	0.11
“Lesbian or gay”, n (%)	199 (1.4)	101 (1.5)	98 (1.2)**	0.02
“Bisexual”, n (%)	700 (5.3)	175 (2.7)	525 (7.7)***	−0.13
“Something else”, n (%)	267 (1.8)	97 (1.5)	170 (2.2)***	−0.03
“Don’t know/not sure”, n (%)	335 (2.9)	137 (2.3)	198 (3.4)***	−0.04

Note. Sample sizes were unweighted, while percentages were obtained with sample weights. SBHC = school-based health center.

^*p < .05

^**p < .01

^***p < .001