Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 10;88(1):3–9. doi: 10.2319/060117-369.1

Table 5.

Comparison of Annualized Changes (T1–T2) of Hypodivergent and Hyperdivergent Herbst Patientsa

Measurement
Hypodivergent
Hyperdivergent
Group Differences
Herbst (n = 23)
Herbst (n = 22)
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
P Value
SNA, °/y −0.71 0.83 −0.59 0.95 .639
SNB, °/y 0.45 0.47 0.23 0.67 .202
ANB, °/y −1.16 0.72 −0.82 0.48 .072
SN-GoMe, °/y 0.29 0.71 0.06 0.79 .306
Rotation, °/y −0.67 0.73 0.37 0.58 <.001
Pg horizontal, mm/y 1.16 0.96 0.00 1.30 .001
Pg vertical, mm/y −2.90 1.84 −3.32 1.80 .443
NAPg, °/y 2.00 2.10 1.82 0.93 .701
a 

Bold indicates significant changes between T1 and T2 (P < .05). Positive increases in NAPg represent decreases in convexity.