(
A) Gene Ontology analysis (DAVID) (
Huang et al., 2009a;
Huang et al., 2009b) of pinometostat-upregulated genes showing top functional classification categories and the number of genes in each category that are significantly upregulated. (
B) Bar graph of Cuffdiff (
Trapnell et al., 2012) output for the expression of
INFG (IFN-γ) from RNA-seq in MV4;11 cells ± 100 nM pinometostat. Values are represented as FPKM + 1 for three independent experiments with standard deviation. Student’s t-test (ns p > 0.05). (
C) Bar graph of Cuffdiff (
Trapnell et al., 2012) output for the expression of
ITGAM (CD11b), ITGAX (CD11c), and
CD86 macrophage cell surface marker expression in MV4;11 cells ± 100 nM pinometostat for 7 days. Values are represented as FPKM + 1 for three independent experiments with standard deviation. Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001). (
D) GSEA (
Subramanian et al., 2005;
Mootha et al., 2003) of the set of differentially expressed genes in MV4;11 cells ± 100 nM pinometostat compared to KEGG_HEMATOPOIETIC_CELL_LINEAGE and IVANOVA_HEMATOPOIESIS_CELL_LINEAGE gene sets from the MSigDB data base. NES - normalized enrichment score. (
E) RT-qPCR analysis of
CSF3R and
CSF1R expression in MV4;11 cells ± 100 nM pinometostat for 7 days. Results are displayed as mean fold-change vs. DMSO-treated cells ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments. Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001). (
F) Venn diagram displaying the overlap between genes downregulated in MV4;11 cells by 100 nM pinometostat treatment (7 days) and genes upregulated in leukemic cells from patients with
FLT3-ITD vs normal
FLT3 karyotypically normal AML (
Cauchy et al., 2015). p-Value computed by two-tailed Fisher Exact test.