Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 28;2(9):100376. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100376

Table 1.

CSC algorithms

Algorithm component New York modela Modified Colorado model Raw SOFA score model
SOFA priority points SOFA < 7: 1 point SOFA < 6: 1 point SOFA 1: 1 point
SOFA 8–11: 2 points SOFA 6-9: 2 points SOFA 2: 2 points
SOFA > 11: 3 points SOFA 10–12: 3 points SOFA 3: 3 points
SOFA > 12: 4 points SOFA score = priority points
Comorbidities priority points None Modified Charlson Comorbidity Indexb None
Priority score calculation SOFA score SOFA prioritization + Charlson Comorbidity Index Score SOFA score
Priority grouping based on priority score High priority: 1 None None
Intermediate priority: 2
Low priority: 3
Tie breakers 1st tie breaker: children 1st tie breaker: children, health care workers, and/or first responders 1st tie breaker: age
2nd tie breaker: life cycle (age)c, pregnancy, and/or sole caretakers for elderly
2nd tie breaker: lottery 3rd tie breaker: lottery 2nd tie breaker: lottery
a

The New York Algorithm exclusion criteria include the following: (1) unwitnessed cardiac arrest, recurrent arrest without hemodynamic stability, arrest unresponsive to standard interventions and measures; trauma-related arrest; (2) irreversible age-specific hypotension unresponsive to fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy; (3) traumatic brain injury with no motor response to painful stimulus (i.e., best motor response = 1); (4) severe burns where predicted survival is ≤10% even with unlimited aggressive therapy; and (5) any other conditions resulting in immediate or near-immediate mortality even with aggressive therapy. None of the patients in this cohort fell into this exclusion criteria.

b

Original and modified Comorbidity Index provided in Table S3.

c

Life cycle groupings (age, years) for Colorado also used for Raw SOFA model: 0–49 = 1 (highest priority), 50–59 = 2, 60–69 = 3, 70–79 = 4, and 80+ = 5 (lowest priority).