Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar 14;110(2):409–423. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2195

Table 1.

Summary data on candidate interacting precipitants and semi-Bayes shrunk rate ratios for unintentional traumatic injury, by antidepressant object drug

Object drug
Amitriptyline Amoxapine Bupropion Citalopram Clomipramine Desipramine Desvenlafaxine Doxepin Duloxetine
Unadjusted analyses
Candidate interacting precipitants examined, count 495 21 483 549 121 175 303 341 485
 DDI signals, count (%) 33 (6.7) 0 (0.0) 37 (7.7) 50 (9.1) 1 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 9 (3.0) 13 (3.8) 30 (6.2)
 Increased rate* 11 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 13 (2.7) 19 (3.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 4 (1.3) 4 (1.2) 13 (2.7)
 Decreased rate** 22 (4.4) 0 (0.0) 24 (5.0) 31 (5.6) 1 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 5 (1.7) 9 (2.6) 17 (3.5)
 RR range, min to max 0.40 – 1.92 0.69 – 1.27 0.55 – 2.15 0.41 – 2.52 0.45 – 1.85 0.63 – 2.08 0.50 – 2.09 0.54 – 1.89 0.58 – 2.60
Confounder-adjusted analyses
Candidate interacting precipitants examined, count 495 21 483 549 121 174 303 341 484
 DDI signals, count (%) 40 (8.1) 0 (0.0) 38 (7.9) 55 (10.0) 1 (0.8) 2 (1.1) 10 (3.3) 11 (3.2) 32 (6.6)
 Increased rate* 16 (3.2) 0 (0.0) 16 (3.3) 27 (4.9) 0 (0.0) 2 (1.1) 5 (1.7) 5 (1.5) 16 (3.3)
 Decreased rate** 24 (4.8) 0 (0.0) 22 (4.6) 28 (5.1) 1 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 5 (1.7) 6 (1.8) 16 (3.3)
 RR range, min to max 0.39 – 1.94 0.60 – 1.26 0.55 – 2.19 0.42 – 2.45 0.52 – 1.98 0.59 – 2.10 0.50 – 2.08 0.50 – 2.05 0.55 – 2.62
Escitalopram Fluoxetine Fluvoxamine Imipramine Levomilna. Maprotiline Mirtazapine Nefazodone Nortriptyline
Unadjusted analyses
Candidate interacting precipitants examined, count 560 546 181 296 11 13 449 206 384
 DDI signals, count (%) 39 (7.0) 39 (7.1) 6 (3.3) 3 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 30 (6.7) 4 (1.9) 17 (4.4)
 Increased rate* 18 (3.2) 16 (2.9) 5 (2.8) 2 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 25 (5.6) 3 (1.5) 9 (2.3)
 Decreased rate** 21 (3.8) 23 (4.2) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 5 (1.1) 1 (0.5) 8 (2.1)
 RR range, min to max 0.43 – 1.95 0.59 – 2.18 0.43 – 2.24 0.55 – 2.10 1.23 – 2.31 0.91 – 2.06 0.55 – 2.22 0.59 – 3.05 0.57 – 2.44
Confounder-adjusted analyses
Candidate interacting precipitants examined, count 560 545 181 294 11 13 449 206 383
 DDI signals, count (%) 39 (7.0) 41 (7.5) 7 (3.9) 5 (1.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 34 (7.6) 5 (2.4) 16 (4.2)
 Increased rate* 20 (3.6) 20 (3.7) 5 (2.8) 3 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 24 (5.3) 5 (2.4) 10 (2.6)
 Decreased rate** 19 (3.4) 21 (3.9) 2 (1.1) 2 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 10 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 6 (1.6)
 RR range, min to max 0.41 – 2.06 0.48 – 2.28 0.45 – 2.26 0.48 – 2.15 1.36 – 2.54 0.91 – 2.06 0.52 – 2.38 0.61 – 3.06 0.53 – 2.96
Paroxetine Protriptyline Sertraline Trazodone Trimipramine Venlafaxine Vilazodone Vortioxetine
Unadjusted analyses
Candidate interacting precipitants examined, count 529 36 567 490 2 510 164 44
 DDI signals, count (%) 35 (6.6) 0 (0.0) 62 (10.9) 30 (6.1) 0 (0.0) 45 (8.8) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Increased rate* 13 (2.5) 0 (0.0) 23 (4.1) 13 (2.7) 0 (0.0) 18 (3.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Decreased rate** 22 (4.2) 0 (0.0) 39 (6.9) 17 (3.5) 0 (0.0) 27 (5.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 RR range, min to max 0.50 – 2.01 0.78 – 1.87 0.48 – 2.44 0.40 – 1.99 0.81 – 0.86 0.51 – 1.79 0.57 – 2.05 0.73 – 1.72
Confounder-adjusted analyses
Candidate interacting precipitants examined, count 528 36 567 490 2 510 164 43
 DDI signals, count (%) 35 (6.6) 0 (0.0) 60 (10.6) 30 (6.1) 0 (0.0) 46 (9.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Increased rate* 17 (3.2) 0 (0.0) 28 (4.9) 16 (3.3) 0 (0.0) 21 (4.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Decreased rate** 18 (3.4) 0 (0.0) 32 (5.6) 14 (2.9) 0 (0.0) 25 (4.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 RR range, min to max 0.48 – 1.98 0.80 – 1.88 0.47 – 2.44 0.42 – 2.02 1.20 – 1.26 0.46 – 1.81 0.57 – 2.02 0.67 – 1.63

DDI = drug-drug interaction; levomilna. = levomilnacipran; max = maximum; min = minimum; RR = rate ratio

*

lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for the RR of interest excluded the null value

**

upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the RR of interest excluded the null value