Table 1:
Study | Algorithm | #Subjects | Ages (years) | MAE (years) | Channels/feature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part I. Studies using traditional machine learning | |||||
Cole et al. (2017b) | Gaussian process regression | 2,001 | 18–90 | 5.01 | T1w WM/GM/CSF maps |
Chung et al. (2018) | Ridge regressionR | 1,373 | 3–21 | 1.41 | T1w ROI features |
Kwaket al. (2018) | Partial least square regression | 666 | 40–94 | 6.795 *% | Tiw ROI features |
Lewis et al. (2018) | Linear regression | 1,592 | 3–22 | 1.52 | T1w GM image |
Aycheh et al. (2018) | Gaussian process regression | 2,911 | 45–91 | 4.05 | T1w ROI features |
Becker et al. (2018) | Gaussian process regression | 6,362 | 5–90 | 3.86 | T1w ROI features |
Pomponio et al. (2020) | Generalized additive model | 10,477 | 3–96 | 5.35 | T1w ROI features |
Hu et al. (2020) | Logistic regression | 251 | 0–2 | 0.09 † | T1w ROI features |
Part II. Studies using deep learning | |||||
Cole et al. (2017a) | 3D CNN | 2,001 | 18–90 | 4.16 | T1w image |
Jónsson et al. (2019) | 3D ResNet | 1,264 | 15–80 | 3.63 | T1w image |
Feng et al. (2020) | 3D CNN | 10,158 | 18–97 | 4.06 | T1w image |
Jiang et al. (2020) | 3D CNN | 1,454 | 18–90 | 5.55 | T1w image |
Bashyam et al. (2020) | 2D ResNet | 11,729 | 3–95 | 3.702 | T1w image |
Peng et al. (2020) | 3D CNN | 14,503 | 42–82 | 2.14 | T1w image |
He et al. (2020) | 2D ResNet+LSTM | 1,640 | 0–20 | 0.96 | T1w image |
Proposed | 3D Fus-CNN | 16,705 | 0–97 | T1w split into contrast and morphometry images |
: This study reported root mean square error (RMSE) instead of mean absolute error (MAE).
: While all other studies used cross-sectional data (MRI from only 1 visit), this study used longitudinal data, where each subject had 7 MRIs, scanned every 3 months until 1 year old and every 6 months until 2 years old.