Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 May 21;27(8):689–695. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.05.007

Table III.

Univariate analysis of factors for outcomes after second HCT

Variables Progression Free Survival Overall Survival Progression Non Relapse Mortality
N vs N HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
Second HCT before vs after 2011 46 vs 45 1.4 (0.8–2.4) 0.2 1.2(0.75–2.02) 0.4 0.9 (0.4–1.6) 0.6 1.1 (0.4–2.8) 0.9
Age at second HCT ≥60 vs <60 years 16 vs 75 1.5 (0.7–3.6) 0.3 1.5 (0.7–3.3) 0.3 0.9 (0.3–2.9) 0.8 3.8 (1.2–12) 0.02
Age at second HCT ≥40 vs <40 years 54 vs 37 1.7 (0.96–2.9) 0.07 1.5 (0.9–2.5) 0.09 1.4 (0.7–2.6) 0.4 1.4 (0.5–3.7) 0.5
Female vs Male 43 vs 48 1.5 (0.9–2.6) 0.1 1.2 (0.7–1.9) 0.5 0.8 (0.4–1.6) 0.5 0.9 (0.3–2.4) 0.8
HCT-CI ≥2 vs 0–1 46 vs 45 1.8 (1.0–3.2) 0.05 1.7 (0.99–2.9) 0.05 1.01 (0.5–1.9) 0.9 1.3 (0.5–3.4) 0.6
Primary vs t-AML 85 vs 6 1.7 (0.7–4.3) 0.3 1.9 (0.8–4.4) 0.1 1.4 (0.4–4.6) 0.6 0.9 (0.1–5.6) 0.9
Response before second HCT
 CR/CRi vs Persistent disease* 56 vs 22 0.8 (0.4–1.5) 0.5 0.7 (0.4–1.2) 0.2 0.6 (0.3–1.2) 0.1 1.5 (0.4–5.4) 0.5
Duration of remission after first HCT
 ≤6 months vs >6 months 28 vs 63 1.4 (0.8–2.4) 0.3 1.4 (0.8–2.4) 0.2 0.6 (0.3–1.2) 0.1 1.5 (0.4–5.4) 0.5
Haploidentical vs another donor 19 vs 72 0.8 (0.4–1.6) 0.5 0.86 (0.5–1.6) 0.6 0.8 (0.4–1.7) 0.6 0.9 (0.2–3.2) 0.9
Haploidentical vs MUD or MRD 19 vs
32 / 37
0.8 (0.4–1.6) 0.5 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 0.7 0.8 (0.4–1.7) 0.6 0.9 (0.3–3.3) 0.9
MUD vs MRD 32 vs 37 0.7 (0.4–1.4) 0.3 0.8 (0.5–1.5) 0.5 0.9 (0.5–1.9) 0.9 2.5 (0.7–8.2) 0.1
Same vs different donor 43 vs 48 0.9 (0.5–1.5) 0.7 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.3 1.1 (0.6–2.2) 0.7 0.5 (0.2–1.4) 0.2
MAC vs RIC for second HCT 20 vs 71 1.1 (0.6–2.1) 0.6 1.3 (0.7–2.3) 0.4 1.2 (0.6–2.6) 0.6 1.1 (0.4–3.4) 0.8
Graft source
 Peripheral blood 71 1.0 (0.6–1.8) 0.9 0.8 (0.4–1.6) 0.6 1.6 (0.7–3.6) 0.3 0.6 (0.2–1.7) 0.3
 Bone marrow 19 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Cord blood 1 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
GVHD prophylaxis for second HCT
 PTCy vs no PTCy 25 vs 66 0.6 (0.3–1.2) 0.2 0.7 (0.4–1.2) 0.2 0.8 (0.3–1.6) 0.4 0.6 (0.2–2.2) 0.5
Acute GVHD grade 3–4 after first HCT 4 vs 87 2.8 (0.9–9) 0.09 2.2 (0.7–6.9) 0.2 0.9 (0.4–2.2) 0.9 1.7 (0.2–15) 0.6
Chronic GVHD after first HCT 17 vs 74 3.03 (1.7–5.5) <0.001 2.6 (1.5–4.8) 0.001 0.9 (0.4–2.4) 0.9 1.7 (0.5–5.2) 0.4
Cytogenetic risk per ELN at time of second HCT
 Adverse vs intermediate 18 vs 61 1.3 (0.7–2.3) 0.4 0.9 0.4 2.0 (0.9–4.2) 0.06 0.5 (0.1–2.5) 0.4

Abbreviations: HCT=hematopoietic cell transplantation; HR=hazards ratio; MRD=measurable residual disease; CI=confidence interval; t-AML=therapy related acute myeloid leukemia; CR=complete response; CRi=complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery; MRD=matched related donor; MUD=matched unrelated donor; CB=cord blood; MAC=myeloablative conditioning; RIC=reduced intensity conditioning; ELN=European Leukemia Network; GVHD=graft-versus-host disease; PTCy=posttransplant cyclophosphamide.

*

Unevaluable patients excluded (unevaluable include patients with 1) aplastic marrow insufficient for analysis and/or 2) patients who received a salvage treatment following the most recent disease evaluation.