1. Introduction
The rat sarcoma viral oncogene/mitogen-activated protein kinase (RAS/MAPK) signaling pathway is a critical signaling pathway involved in cellular proliferation and differentiation, cell senescence, embryonal development, and oncogenesis (1, 2). The RASopathies are a group of at least 7 unique clinical syndromes (Table 1), but resulting from the unifying molecular mechanism of dysregulated signaling in the RAS/MAPK pathway. As such, they share certain overlapping clinical characteristics, including specific craniofacial and ocular dysmorphology, congenital cardiac malformations, neurodevelopmental deficits and a propensity for cancer. While RASopathies are rare disorders, as a group they affect ~1:1000 individuals (1, 2). Each RASopathy, however, is independently described and frequently attributable to specific germline mutations in RAS/MAPK pathway components (Table 1).
Table 1:
RASopathies with reported musculoskeletal features
| Syndrome | Common Clinical Features (non-MS1) |
Musculoskeletal (MS) Features and/or Pathology |
Pathway Gene(s) and % contribution |
Protein // Function |
Inheritance: Germline vs. Mosaic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) |
|
|
NF1: 100% | Neurofibromin // RasGAP | AD Germline + Mosaic |
| Noonan Syndrome (NS) |
|
|
PTPN11: 50% SOS1:13-15% RAF1: 5%RIT1: 5% KRAS: <5% NRAS: <1% SHOC2: <1% CBL: <1% BRAF MAP2K1 LZTR1 |
SHP2 // Phosphatase SOS1 // RasGEF CRAF // Kinase RIT1 // ELK1 transactivation KRAS // GTPase NRAS // GTPase SHOC2 // Scaffolding CBL // E3 ubiquitin ligase BRAF // Kinase MEK 1 // Kinase |
AD Germline (de novo mutations) AD + AR |
| Noonan Syndrome with Multiple Lentigines (NSML) |
|
|
PTPN11 RAF1 BRAF MAP2K1 |
SHP2 // Phosphatase CRAF // Kinase BRAF // Kinase MEK 1 // Kinase |
AD |
| Capillary Malformation-Arteriovenous Malformation Syndrome (CM-AVM) |
|
|
RASA1 | P120-RasGAP // RasGAP | AD Germline + Mosaic (de novo mutations) |
| Costello Syndrome (CS) |
|
|
HRAS: 90% | HRAS // GTPase | AD Germline + Mosaic (mostly de novo mutations) paternal bias/advanced paternal age |
| Cardio-facio-cutaneous Syndrome (CFCS) |
|
|
BRAF: 75% MAP2KI + MAP2K2: 25% together KRAS: <2% |
BRAF // Kinase MEK 1 // Kinase MEK2 // Kinase KRAS // GTPase |
AD (de novo mutations) |
| Legius Syndrome (LS) |
|
|
SPRED1 | SPRED1 // Negative regulator of RAS | AD Germline (de novo mutations) |
MS, musculoskeletal; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; AV, arteriovenous.
This review focuses on germline mutations and provides an overview of each RASopathy, specifically concentrating on the musculoskeletal abnormalities of those RASopathies in which musculoskeletal features are recognized, often as another overlapping component of these syndromes. Herein, we will emphasize the musculoskeletal phenotype and bone histology associated with each syndrome, along with a discussion of the cellular and molecular underpinnings of syndrome-specific musculoskeletal pathology, as delineated by in vivo and in vitro data. Finally, we will review the role of the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway in skeletal development, and discuss potential therapeutic targets for amelioration of musculoskeletal findings in the RASopathies.
2. Clinical Descriptions
2.1. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1; OMIM #162200; Figure 1)
Figure 1: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).
A - Skeletal findings that have been reported to occur in NF1 in the appendicular and axial skeleton. B - Skeletal findings that have been reported to occur in NF1 in the cranium. C – Mutation (highlighted) in NF1 in the RAS/MAPK pathway.
2.1.1. Phenotypic overview:
The diagnostic criteria for NF1 were formalized by consensus in 1987 (3), although the disorder was first described ~100 years earlier by the German pathologist, Friedrich Daniel Von Recklinghausen (4). Clinical features of NF1 must include two or more of the following: café-au-lait macules (CALM), with ≥6 lesions, each being >5 mm (pre-pubertal) or >15 mm (post-pubertal) in size; skinfold freckling (typically axillary or inguinal); ≥2 neurofibromas (dermal, plexiform, or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors); optic pathway glioma; ≥2 Lisch nodules (iris hamartomas); a distinct bony dysplasia (sphenoid wing or tibial); and a 1st degree relative with NF1, also diagnosed according to these criteria (5). NF1 is an autosomal dominant disorder, but unlike many of the other RASopathies, NF1 is a monogenic syndrome resulting from a germline mutation in the NF1 tumor suppressor gene for neurofibromin. As such, NF1 carries the highest malignancy risk among the RASopathies, contributing to a modestly reduced lifespan (6, 7). Because neurofibromin functions as a negative regulator of the RAS proto-oncogene, neurofibromin deficit leads to RAS hyper-activation. NF1 is estimated to affect 1:2500 - 1:3000 individuals worldwide (8, 9).
2.1.2. Musculoskeletal features:
Of all the RASopathies, musculoskeletal (MS) features of these disorders are perhaps best described in NF1. As listed in Table 1, MS features of NF 1 include: 1) pediatric and adult short stature; 2) a distinct bone dysplasia, occurring in the sphenoid wing of the cranium, the tibia/fibula, or in vertebrae; 3) macrocephaly; 4) osteopenia or osteoporosis; 5) pseudarthrosis; and 6) scoliosis. A propensity for the development of rhabdomyosarcomas is also characteristic of NF1. For a review of the orthopedic-specific management of NF1, see DeLucia, et al (10).
Short stature:
Short stature is a commonly reported feature of NF1, with a reported prevalence ranging between 13 – 30% (11-13). Children with NF1 are significantly shorter than age-matched population norms (12), and reportedly shorter than their unaffected siblings (14). However, a study of 170 individuals with NF1 followed longitudinally at a single center (and excluding those with potentially height-compromising skeletal anomalies), demonstrated that while this population had a mean height z-score of −0.5 ± 1.27 SD, and 68% of NF1 children had negative height Z-scores relative to the population mean, the prevalence of true short stature, defined as a height >2 SDs below mean, was observed in only 8% of children with NF1 (14). These data imply that while the height distribution curve for the NF1 population is clearly shifted to the left, the overall occurrence rate for true short stature, exclusive of other height-compromising skeletal pathology, may be somewhat less than previously expected (14).
The pathophysiology underlying short stature in NF1 remains unclear; however, suboptimal growth in NF1 has been attributed to: 1) a relatively frequent co-existence of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) (15); 2) organic GHD attributable to a propensity to develop destructive suprasellar lesions; 3) reduced peak height velocity and height acquisition occurring during the pubertal growth spurt (16); 4) height-compromising skeletal pathology (i.e. severe scoliosis, tibial dysplasia, bowing of long bones); and 5) a specific association between short stature and the presence of sphenoid wing dysplasia (17). A specific genetic influence of the NF1 mutation on height and/or growth has also been proposed (14).
Axial skeleton:
Abnormalities of both the thorax and vertebral column are characteristic of NF1. Both typical (non-dystrophic) scoliosis, and dystrophic scoliosis can occur in NF1, with prevalence estimates ranging from 10-21% of individuals (13, 18), to as high as 49% of individuals with NF1 (19). Non-dystrophic scoliosis is the more common of the two, usually presenting in early adolescence, with similarities in presentation and treatment approach to idiopathic scoliosis in the general population. In contrast, dystrophic scoliosis, described as “a short-segment, sharply angulated curve associated with underlying vertebral-body and rib abnormalities and sometimes with adjacent plexiform neurofibromas” (5) is apparent in earlier childhood (ages 6-10 years) (6), can be more rapidly progressive, at times associated with respiratory impairment (20), and typically requires surgical correction (5, 13, 21). Unfortunately, for a given individual, modulation between non-dystrophic and dystrophic scoliosis can also occur (10, 22); hence a true distinction between the two types may be inexact.
Consistent with many of the RASopathies, chest wall deformities, including pectus carinatum and excavatum, are also reported in NF1 (5), although with variable estimates of occurrence, ranging from 4.3% of individuals (18) to one-third of individuals with NF1 (5). Interestingly, while the NF1 mutation is known to exhibit extreme variability of clinical presentation, one study of monozygotic twin pairs with NF1 demonstrated a high concordance for pectus deformities, perhaps suggesting a less modifiable hereditary basis for this particular finding (23).
Appendicular skeleton:
The predominant abnormality of the appendicular skeleton in NF1 is congenital tibial dysplasia, heralded by anterolateral tibial bowing and/or fracture. Characteristic bowing becomes evident in later infancy or in the toddler and preschool years (6). Radiographic features of this anomaly include cortical thickening of the tibia, with narrowing of the medullary canal and the appearance of hyperplastic fibrous tissue. Tibial dysplasia occurs in ~5% of individuals with NF1 (18); less commonly, other long bones, including the femur, ulna, radius, and humerus, may exhibit this bone dysplasia (10).
Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia, while rare, is none-the-less a very specific diagnostic feature of NF1 (10, 24), in that two-thirds of infants identified with this lesion have NF1 (5). Non-union following long-bone fracture can also lead to acquired pseudarthrosis in persons with NF1 (25).
Cranium and jaw:
Macrocephaly is common in NF1, occurring in 24% of individuals (12). Although a clinical feature of NF1, the etiology of macrocephaly is not understood, and further evaluation or intervention is typically not needed (5). Other abnormalities of the skull and jaw include sphenoid wing dysplasia, a congenital, unilateral, frequently disfiguring defect in the greater wing of the sphenoid, often associated with periorbital plexiform neurofibroma. Sphenoid wing dysplasia is estimated to occur in 3-11% of individuals with NF1 (26). For a comprehensive review of orbital dysplasia associated with plexiform neurofibroma, see Friedrich et al. (27). Periapical cemental dysplasia, a benign condition of the jaw more common in African American women, is also common in women with NF1 (28).
Bone density and/or histology:
Lower bone mineral density (BMD), as assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), has been confirmed in pediatric patients with NF1. A study of 84 individuals with NF1 (ages 5-18 years; 54% male) compared with 293 healthy children without NF1 (ages 3-21 years) reported significant decrements in bone mineral content (BMC) and areal BMD (aBMD) of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and whole body; and in bone mineral apparent density (BMAD; corrected for height) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck (29). Relatively greater decrements were noted in those individuals who also had localized osseous dysplasias (29). Similarly, among a study of 69 pediatric and young adult patients with NF1 (ages 5.2-24.8 years) and a high plexiform neurofibroma burden, 47% of these patients exhibited reduced BMAD by DXA (Z-score ≤ −2, compared with reference data), which was most severe at the lumbar spine (30). Findings of height-corrected, impaired bone density in NF1, meeting diagnostic criteria for osteopenia and/or osteoporosis, have been corroborated by several other pediatric studies (31-34).
A diagnosis of osteopenia is also very common among adults with NF1 (35, 36), and frequently progresses to osteoporosis by middle age (37). Consequently, osteoporosis is reported to occur in 20-40% of the adult NF1 population, and is associated with an increased risk for fracture (28, 35). As example, a Finnish population registry study involving 460 NF1 patients demonstrated that adults ≥41 years of age had a 5.2x risk ratio for fracture compared with age- and gender-matched controls (38). In this same study, children <17 years of age also had a 3.4x risk ratio for fracture compared to controls (38).
Contributing to this increased bone fragility in NF1, microstructural analyses of bone from NF1 patients have revealed: 1) increased osteocyte-related microporosity in cortical bone (39); 2) reduced trabecular bone, either Tb.BV by histomorphometry (40) or trabecular bone score (TBS) by DXA (41); and 3) increased osteoid volume (40). Many of these studies have also demonstrated that reduced bone density and/or quality in NF1 occurs independently of the more common demographic, social or physiological determinants for low BMD in the general population (37, 41, 42). Together, these studies imply that the neurofibromin mutation itself may have a detrimental effect on bone. Finally, hypovitaminosis D is also common among individuals with NF1 (34-36) and has been postulated to be a critical determinant of decreased BMD in the NF1 population (40).
2.2. Noonan Syndrome (NS; OMIM #163950; Figure 2)
Figure 2: Noonan Syndrome (NS).
A - Skeletal findings that have been reported to occur in NS in the appendicular and axial skeleton. B - Skeletal findings that have been reported to occur in NS in the cranium. C – Mutations (highlighted) in NS in the RAS/MAPK pathway.
2.2.1. Phenotypic overview:
As originally described in 1963 by pediatric cardiologists, Drs. Jacqueline A. Noonan and Dorothy A. Ehmke (43, 44), NS has been characterized by the phenotype of short stature; distinctive facial features (hypertelorism, down-slanting palpebral fissures, ptosis, shortened or webbed neck, low-set ears); congenital heart defects (pulmonary valve stenosis, atrial septal defects, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy); mild intellectual deficits; cryptorchidism or hypogonadism; and bleeding disorders (44, 45). NS is an autosomal dominant disorder, with an estimated incidence of 1:1000-2500 live births (2). RAS/MAPK pathway mutations identified in this genetically heterogeneous disorder are listed in Table 1 (1) and include gain-of-function mutations in genes for: Protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11 (PTPN11) (46); Son of Sevenless 1 (SOS1) (47, 48); Raf-1 proto-oncogene (RAF1) (49, 50); Ras like without CAAZ 1 (RIT1) (51); Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) (52); Neuroblastoma Ras viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) (53); Leucine-rich repeat scaffold protein (SHOC2) (54); and Casitas B-lineage lymphoma proto-oncogene (CBL) (55). Missense mutations in leucine zipper-like transcriptional regulator (LZTR1) have also been described (56). Finally, mutations in B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) and Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MAP2K1) have been reported rarely (57, 58).
2.2.2. Musculoskeletal (MS) features:
As listed in Table 1, MS features are characteristic of NS and include: 1) suboptimal and/or delayed childhood growth, contributing to adult short stature; 2) deformities of the axial skeleton, including spine and rib cage (kyphosis, scoliosis, vertebral abnormalities, pectus deformities); 3) micrognathia and dental malocclusion; 4) cubitus valgus; 5) brachydactyly and syndactyly; and 6) decreased bone mineral density (although less commonly than in other RASopathies) (59). Giant cell lesions of bone are another associated feature of NS, as well as of other RASopathies (60-62).
Short stature:
Despite a normal birth weight and length, decreased growth velocity and/or short stature, present in ~50% of NS individuals, emerges as these children advance toward adult height, independent of the severity of underlying NS comorbidities (63). As alternately stated, ~50% of persons with NS, without intervention, will fall above the 3rd-centile on standardized growth curves at final height, consistent with a reported mean final adult height of 162.5 cm for males and 152.7 cm for females (Noonan Syndrome Clinical Management Guidelines) (63, 64). By comparison, a more recent natural history study of the Noonan Syndrome Research Group, London, UK, reporting on the adult phenotype of 112 individuals with NS, recorded a greater final height of 169.8 vs. 153.3 cm (male vs. female), potentially indicative of treatment and/or population cohort differences across time (65). Finally, among a cohort of 35 individuals with NS in the Harvard Noonan Syndrome Genotype-Phenotype Correlation study, the mean final adult height for both men (164.6 cm) and women (152.7 cm) was between 3rd-10th centile (66).
The biological basis for growth failure in NS is arguable, but has been attributed to downregulation of growth hormone (GH)-receptor signaling (67), and/or relative insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1) deficiency (67, 68). Consistent with dysregulation in GH signaling, retrospective analysis following 25 years of intervention, suggests a role for exogenous growth hormone administration to improve growth and height outcomes in NS (69), although the greatest gains are observed within the first two years of GH therapy (70, 71), with diminished efficacy thereafter (45). Mutations in RAF1 (72) and SHOC2 (73) have been associated with a relatively higher incidence of short stature, while mutations in SOS1 (72) are associated with a lower incidence of short stature among individuals with NS. In comparison, short stature is equally prevalent among individuals with PTPN11 mutations, as compared with the combined subgroup who are PTPN11 mutation-negative (44).
Axial skeleton:
Early descriptions of NS (based on clinical diagnostic criteria, prior to molecular confirmation) included reports of thoracic scoliosis in ~13% of individuals (74); later reports have also confirmed this prevalence rate (65). Reports by Dr. Noonan, herself, indicated that “scoliosis and kyphosis occur in about 15% of patients” (45). However, evaluation of a larger cohort of children with NS, diagnosed in South Korea, demonstrated a 30% incidence of spine deformities, including scoliosis or scoliosis associated with thoracic lordosis, with a mean age of detection of nine years (75), perhaps suggesting some population-specific differences. Additionally, scoliosis may become more evident as children age (66). Scoliosis appears to be equally prevalent among PTPN11-mutation positive and SOS1-mutation positive individuals (66).
Anterior chest wall anomalies, including superior pectus carinatum and inferior pectus excavatum along with a broad thorax are characteristic of NS, becoming apparent in early childhood (45, 59) and more obvious over time (76). The prevalence of chest wall anomalies has been estimated as affecting 28-95% of individuals with NS (59), and has been reported in NS attributed to PTPN11 (44), KRAS [broad chest (77)] and SOS1 mutations (73). Vertebral defects have also been reported (75).
Appendicular skeleton:
Upper limb anomalies include outward deviation of the elbow (cubitus valgus), along with brachydactyly and occasional reports of syndactyly (78). Cubitus valgus is the most common upper limb deformity, and has been reported in 45% (75) to 50% (78) of persons with NS.
Cranium and jaw:
In NS, the head has an appearance of macrocephaly, with a high, prominent forehead, yet bitemporal constriction, resulting in a turricephalic presentation (78). Interestingly, however, the Noonan Syndrome Research Group has reported a mean adult occipital-frontal head circumference of 56.4 cm in males (range 50-64 cm) and 54.9 cm in females (range 52-59 cm), which is near the 50th-centile for the general population (65). In contrast, micrognathia, a highly arched palate and dental overcrowding are also relatively common maxillofacial findings in NS (65, 78), contributing to a more triangular overall facial shape with aging (78).
Bone density and/or histology:
Data regarding the frequency of osteopenia or osteoporosis in NS are limited. Small cohort studies have indicated that children with NS have lower bone mineral density (BMD), when compared with age, gender and height-matched control groups (79). Additionally, a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis has been reported in ~14% of adults with NS (66). Increased bone resorption, as evidence by an increase in urine pyridinium crosslinks has also been reported in the RASopathies, including NS specifically (80).
Bone tissue neoplasms:
Multiple giant cell lesions (MGCL) of bone and soft tissues occur in a subset of NS patients with PTPN11 mutations, often described separately as Noonan-like/multiple giant cell lesion syndrome (NL/MGCLS). However, these same PTPN11 mutations have been described in NS, Noonan Syndrome with Multiple Lentigines (NSML) and Cardio-facio-cutaneous Syndrome (CFCS), suggesting that other mechanisms may contribute to this comorbidity (57). Rarely, MGSL of the craniofacial region, specifically, have been reported in NS (81).
2.3. Noonan Syndrome with Multiple Lentigines (NSML; OMIM # 151100)
2.3.1. Phenotypic overview:
Noonan Syndrome with Multiple Lentigines [NSML; formerly named Leopard Syndrome (82)] is a rare disorder (~200 individuals reported) that is considered an allelic variant of NS. The genetic basis of disease is attributable to a heterozygous pathogenic mutation in one of four genes that overlap with NS (PTPN11, RAF1, BRAF, and MAP2K1) (57, 83). Although a more restricted spectrum of mutations has been associated with NSML, this genetic overlap with NS also contributes to a phenotypic overlap between NSML and NS. Similar to NS, NSML is characterized by craniofacial dysmorphism, short stature, chest wall abnormalities, intellectual deficits (mild), and genital anomalies (often cryptorchidism) (57, 84). However, NSML is further defined by the pathognomonic feature of multiple lentigines (ML), along with other specific features, including EKG abnormalities and sensorineural deafness. The characteristic lentigines are described as small (<0.5 cm), black-brown macules, concentrated in the face, neck and upper trunk, associated with melanocyte hyperplasia, and markedly increasing in number from the age of 4-5 years through puberty (84, 85). EKG abnormalities, progressive conduction anomalies, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (49) are common, with heart defects present in 70-85% of the NSML population (57, 84). Sensorineural deafness is also diagnosed in ~20% of individuals (57). Establishing the diagnosis of NSML requires ML plus 2 cardinal features (cardiac abnormalities, poor growth, pectus deformity, facial dysmorphia); or if no ML, 3 cardinal features and a 1st degree relative with NSML (57, 84).
NSML is an autosomal dominant disorder, predominantly resulting from de novo mutations in the proband or parent. Approximately 90% of NSML cases are attributed to PTPN11 mutations (57) which predominate at residues critical to the switch between inactive vs. active conformations of the PTPN11 protein (SRC Homolog 2 domain-containing PTPase, or SHP-2). Hence, these mutations result in altered SHP-2 catalytic activity (1, 86). The true prevalence of NSML is unknown, perhaps due to phenotypic overlap with other RASopathies. However, a male predominance for NSML has been reported (87).
2.3.2. Musculoskeletal features:
As shown in Table 1, MS features of NSML share some similarity to those of NS, although the MS phenotype in NSML is milder.
Short stature:
Birthweight is normal or above average in NSML (88), while birth length is normal (89). Hence, in one study, macrosomia at birth was reported in 10 of 25 PTPN11-associated cases of NSML (89). Thereafter, growth failure develops in some individuals with NSML, although this is less frequent and less severe than in NS (89). Consequently, only 25% of individuals with NSML have an adult height at <3rd percentile (59, 84). In NSML, short stature may be mutation-specific, being more common with PTPN11 mutations at the Tyr279 residue (84).
Axial skeleton:
Chest wall anomalies are the most common MS feature of NSML. A broad chest with either pectus carinatum or excavatum is described in 33% (88) to 75% (84) of individuals. Scoliosis has also been reported sporadically (84).
Appendicular skeleton:
Joint hyper-flexibility is a rarely reported component of NSML (82, 90).
Cranium and jaw:
Craniosynostosis can occur in NSML, both in individuals with PTPN11 mutations (91) and those with RAF1 mutations (90). Additionally, prognathism of the mandible can develop in individuals with NSML (81, 90).
2.4. Capillary Malformation-Arteriovenous Malformation Syndrome (CM-AVM, type 1; OMIM #608354)
2.4.1. Phenotypic overview:
The diagnostic hallmark of CV-AVM is the presence of multiple, multifocal, small (<1-3 cm), pinkish, capillary malformations (CM), along with an increased risk for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and arteriovenous fistulas (92, 93). Vascular malformations can involve many tissues, including the skin, subcutaneous tissues, muscles, bones (extremities and spine), and various internal organs (heart and brain) (1). CMs, specifically, are most frequently found on the trunk, extremities, head and neck (94). Cardiovascular malformations, including tetralogy of Fallot and septal or valve anomalies can also exist (1). CV-AVM, type 1 (CV-AVM1) is caused by autosomal dominant, loss-of-function mutations in the RAS p21 protein activator 1 (RASA1) gene (95). Mosaic RASA1 mutations have also been recently identified in individuals with CM-AVM (96).
2.4.2. Musculoskeletal features:
MS anomalies are not a characteristic component of CM-AVM. Instead, secondary skeletal abnormalities can develop due to bone overgrowth of an involved limb (94, 97). Intraosseous AVMs of the maxilla or mandible can also impact dental occlusion (81).
2.5. Costello Syndrome (CS; OMIM #218040; Figure 3)
Figure 3: Costello Syndrome (CS).
A - Skeletal findings that have been reported to occur in CS in the appendicular and axial skeleton. B - Skeletal findings that have been reported to occur in CS in the cranium. C – Mutation (highlighted) in CS in the RAS/MAPK pathway.
2.5.1. Phenotypic overview:
Compared with the other syndromes, Costello Syndrome (CS) is a much rarer developmental RASopathy; prevalence for CS has been estimated at <1:1,290,000 (98) to 1:300,000 (99). The predominant clinical characteristics of CS include (99-101): 1) dysmorphic craniofacial features; such as macrocephaly and coarse facial features consisting of thick eyebrows, epicanthal folds and down-slanting palpebral fissures, a depressed nasal bridge, low set ears with thickened helices and lobes, and a large mouth with full lips; 2) cardiac defects; including pulmonary valve stenosis, septal defects, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and dysrhythmias; 3) ectodermal abnormalities; characterized by curly hair, soft, velvety, redundant, but thickened skin of the dorsum of hands and feet along with deep palmar/plantar creases, and papillomata; 4) musculoskeletal anomalies (detailed below); 5) abnormalities of growth and development; including postnatal failure to thrive and delayed puberty; 6) intellectual disability and developmental delays (estimated IQ, 25-50), associated with structural changes in the brain (enlarged ventricles and Chiari malformation); and 7) an increased risk for both benign (i.e. papillomata) and malignant neoplasms (i.e. rhabdomyosarcoma, transitional cell carcinoma, neuroblastoma), with malignancy onset mostly during childhood. CS is caused by an autosomal dominant germline mutation, typically a heterozygous de novo mutation, in the gene for the Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (HRAS) (99, 102). This RAS/MAPK pathway mutation results in a gain-of-function, or constitutive activation of H-RAS (99). Recognizing that CS shares certain features with other elastin-related disorders, the pathogenesis of CS has been attributed to disrupted elastogenesis, due to a functional deficiency in elastin-binding protein (101, 103).
2.5.2. Musculoskeletal features:
Due to the extreme rarity of this syndrome, available data on MS features of CS are generally limited to descriptive reports of specific anomalies among small CS cohorts. Never-the less, within the CS population, MS features are quite common, and the orthopedic manifestation of CS have been delineated in several orthopedic-focused studies (104-106).
Short stature:
While individuals with CS are large for gestational age (LGA) at birth, postnatal failure-to-thrive ensues, resulting in delays in growth and pubertal development, and ultimately in adult short stature. Adult height in CS is characteristically <5th-centile (104), with mean adult heights of ~ 138-142 cm (107, 108). Adult height can be further diminished by a commonly stooped posture, or by scoliosis. The etiology of growth failure and adult short stature is unknown, although instances of growth hormone (GH) deficiency have been identified (107) and routine screening for GH deficiency is recommended (99).
Axial skeleton:
Similar to other RASopathies, spinal curvature and anterior chest wall deformities (pectus carinatum or excavatum) also occur in CS (59, 108). Kyphosis has been reported in 17% (104) to 58% (106) of individuals with CS, while scoliosis has been reported in 17% (104) to 63% (106) of patients. Unlike other RASopathies, however, curvature reversal of the spine (i.e., thoracic lordosis with lumbar kyphosis) is reportedly unique to CS (106).
Appendicular skeleton:
Ligamentous laxity and hyper-extensible digits are characteristic of the small joints in CS (e.g., hands), while joint contractures are characteristic of the large joints (e.g., ankles, hips, elbows, shoulders). Foot problems, in total, are the most prevalent abnormalities of the appendicular skeleton. Specific abnormalities of the foot, roughly in order of decreasing prevalence, include tight Achilles tendon, planovalgus feet, overriding toes, congenital vertical talus, metatarsus adductus, and hallux valgus (104, 106). Abnormalities of the upper extremities, beyond large joint contractures noted above, include a characteristic presentation of the hands, described as broad, short hands, with hyper-extensible fingers and ulnar deviation of the wrists (106). This CS hand phenotype has been reported in 75% (104) to 85% (106) of those examined. Hip dysplasia, either congenital or acquired, is also a common finding in CS (99, 106).
Cranium and jaw:
Craniofacial features of CS include a relative or absolute macrocephaly (100), with a prominent forehead but with bi-temporal narrowing. Individuals with CS also exhibit a highly arched palate, along with a dental phenotype characterized by delayed tooth development and eruption, malocclusion (81, 99), and hypo-mineralization of tooth enamel (109). For a review of craniofacial and dental development in CS, see Goodwin et al. (109).
Bone density and/or histology:
Osteopenia or osteoporosis are common in the CS population, specifically reported in 47% of patients evaluated by Detweiler et al. (n=34) (106), and in 8 of 8 patients evaluated by White et al. (108). However, the etiology of low BMD has often been attributed to several secondary causes, rather than to a primary bone defect. Possible secondary causes include: reduced overall mobility (104) due to prevalent foot anomalies (105), and ambulation disturbances or limitations; delayed puberty and hypogonadism; reduced GH secretion (107); or a disease-specific myopathy (106, 110). Even so, a study by Stevenson et al. demonstrated a significant elevation in urine pyridinium crosslinks in CS (p<0.0001; n=21 study participants) (80), indicating that increased bone resorption also contributes to the skeletal phenotype of this disorder (similar to data in NS and CFC).
2.6. Cardio-facio-cutaneous Syndrome (CFCS; OMIM #115150)
2.6.1. Phenotypic overview:
Cardio-facio-cutaneous Syndrome (CFCS), so named by Reynolds, et al (111), is characterized by a constellation of specific cardiac, craniofacial and cutaneous/ectodermal abnormalities, which occur along with early growth failure and a severity of neurologic findings or neurodevelopmental delays (112-114). Seizure disorders are also common in CFCS (115). Unlike NS and CS, however, CFCS is not considered a malignancy-prone syndrome. Considerable variability in phenotype can exist in CFCS, which may be mutation subtype-related. Consistent with this variability of presentation, specific heart defects, present in ~75% of individuals, can include any of the following: pulmonic stenosis, septal defects, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, heart valve abnormalities, and heart rhythm disturbances (less commonly than in CS) (113). The distinctive facial dysmorphia is typified by relative or absolute macrocephaly with bi-temporal constriction, a high forehead, hyperteloric appearance, down-slanting palpebral fissures, a short nose with depressed nasal bridge, and low set, posteriorly rotated ears with thickened helices (81, 113). Dermatologic manifestations, a cardinal feature of CFCS, include: hyperkeratotic skin, keratosis pilaris, palmo-plantar keratoderma, or ichthyosis-like skin; sparse, coarse and curly hair; absent or sparse eyebrows; and dystrophic nails (113, 115). Other features characteristic of CFCS can include hypoplastic optic nerves and genitourinary abnormalities (although milder and less frequent than in NS) (115).
CFCS is an autosomal dominant disorder, equally present in males and females (113), and generally resulting from de novo heterozygous mutations in one of predominantly 3 genes, BRAF (75% of mutation-positive individuals)(116), and MAP2K1 or MAP2K2 (25% of mutation-positive individuals, combined)(117); mutations in KRAS have also been reported rarely (<2%), but in individuals with a phenotype that is intermediate to BRAF/MAP2K1 CFCS and NS (118). Most CFCS mutations result in activation of the RAS signaling pathway. CFCS is a rare disorder (perhaps a few hundred individuals), with one estimate of prevalence given as 1:810,000 live births (98).
2.6.2. Musculoskeletal features:
MS features are a relatively common component of CFCS, and descriptive information is available from several cohort analyses (105, 115, 118, 119). For a review of orthopedic conditions identified in CFCS, see Reinker et al. (105).
Short stature:
Individuals with CFCS characteristically exhibit a normal birth weight (113), but experience post-natal growth failure and significant failure to thrive, attributable to feeding difficulties and gastrointestinal abnormalities (115). Hence, short stature is typical of CFCS. In a clinical study of 186 children and young adults (age range; 6 months to 32 years) with mutation-confirmed CFCS, height at <3rd-centile was present in ~60% of individuals at the time they were evaluated, irrespective of whether a BRAF or MAP2K1/MAP2K2 mutation was identified (118). Adult short stature is also common and severe, with final adult height measurements often at 2.5 to 5.0 SD below normal (119). Individual CFCS studies have identified short stature among 70-85% of adult participants (98, 115, 119). In a few cases, growth hormone deficiency has been documented, although much less commonly than in CS (119).
Axial skeleton:
A shield chest with pectus abnormalities, either carinatum or excavatum, are considered the most common anomaly of the axial skeleton, reported in up to 63% of individuals with CFCS (115). Scoliosis, reported in 25-33% (105, 115) of those studied, or kyphosis, in 19-23% (105, 115), are also frequent occurrences; kyphosis, in particular, is more commonly seen in CFCS than in NS (105). A relatively high incidence of cervical stenosis has also been noted in this syndrome (105).
Appendicular skeleton:
A long list of both upper and lower extremity anomalies have been reported in association with CFCS (115, 119, 120). The hands are characteristically short and broad, with shortened fingers, possibly with clinodactyly or campylodactyly. Joint hyper-extensibility is also noted (121). Other abnormalities of the arms include: ulnar deviation [in 38% (119)]; elbow contractures [13% (105)]; and cubitus valgus. The feet are also short and broad, with pes planus reported in 13% to 63% of individuals studied. Other lower extremity features of CFCS can include hip dysplasia (16%), knee contractures (22%), pes cavus, metatarsus varus, hallux valgus, and toe crowding (105).
Cranium and jaw:
Relative or absolute macrocephaly is a nearly universal finding in CFCS, reported in 86-97% of individuals (98, 122), typically with bi-temporal narrowing. Ventriculomegaly can co-exist in ~40% of these patients (114). Hypoplasia of the supraorbital ridge (in 52%) is also a common component of the craniofacial appearance (122). Within the jaw, a highly arched palate, seen in up to 80% of subjects, and more commonly noted with BRAF mutations, contributes to vertical dental malocclusion and the appearance of an open bite (122). Additionally, the presence of dysplastic teeth have been noted in several studies (115, 120).
Bone density and/or histology:
As noted above (See Bone density and/or histology; CS), a study by Stevenson et al. reported a significant increase in the concentration of urine pyridinium cross-links in patient with CFCS, similar to CS and NS, implying increased bone resorption in this syndrome as well (80). Currently, data on the prevalence of osteopenia, osteoporosis or fracture risk with CFCS are limited. However, in a recent report by Chen et al. describing 3 Chinese children with MAP2K1-mutation associated CFCS, osteoporosis was identified in one 10 year-old girl, in conjunction with short stature, multiple skeletal malformations and dysplasia of the hip joint (123).
2.7. Legius Syndrome (LS; OMIM #611431)
2.7.1. Phenotypic overview:
Legius Syndrome (LS), originally referred to as “NF1-like” syndrome, is characterized by a similarity to NF-1 in its cutaneous pigmentary abnormalities, but without neurofibromas or other diagnostic NF-1 criteria (124, 125). The diagnosis of LS is established by at least 2 of the following 3 criteria: ≥ 5 CALM, with or without axillary or inguinal freckling (present in 30-50% of individuals); a heterozygous pathogenic mutation in the gene for Sprouty-related, EVH1 domain containing protein 1 (SPRED1); and/or a parent with LS, diagnosed by the above 2 criteria (124, 126). Additional features of LS include a cognitive phenotype, milder than in NF-1 (127), but characterized by speech or language delays, learning disabilities, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, or autistic-type behaviors (128). Similar to NF-1, LS is an autosomal dominant disorder, resulting either from germline transmission or, less commonly, from de novo mutation. And, similar to neurofibromin, the SPRED1 protein product functions as a negative regulator of the RAS/MAPK pathway; hence the loss-of-function mutation leads to uninhibited RAS signaling. LS is, however, much less common than NF-1, with an estimated prevalence of 1:46,000-1:75,000 individuals (126).
2.7.2. Musculoskeletal features:
MS manifestations of LS are obtainable from the SPRED1-specific database of ~270 individuals with a mutation-confirmed diagnosis of LS (http://www.lovd.nl/SPRED1) (128). Overall, MS features appear to be a less pronounced component of LS, compared with NF-1 or other RASopathies. However, the relatively small number of identified LS individuals may preclude a complete understanding of the skeletal consequences of LS.
Short stature:
An association between LS and absolute short stature (height at >2 SD below population mean) is not clear-cut. Legius et al. reported a 12% frequency of short stature among this population (126), whereas Denayer et al. reported the finding in ~23% of individuals with LS (129). In contrast, other reports indicate that short stature in LS may be uncommon (130).
Axial skeleton:
Pectus excavatum or carinatum, typically mild, has been reported in 7.5-23% of individuals studied in LS cohorts (124, 129, 130). In one such report, scoliosis was also noted in 4 of 30 individuals studied (129).
Appendicular skeleton:
An increased prevalence of unilateral postaxial polydactyly has been reported in individuals with LS (129, 130). Additionally, 5th finger clinodactyly has been infrequently noted (59, 131).
Cranium and jaw:
Relative or absolute macrocephaly is possibly the most common MS feature of LS, and has been reported in ~13% (129), 23% (130) or 42% (124) of individuals in specific LS cohorts (131).
3. Modeling of RASopathies in genetically modified mice
3.1. NF1
A number of mouse models have been generated to examine the impact of mutations within the Nf1 gene as they relate to skeletogenesis. Reports have elucidated how loss of function of NF1 impacts skeletogenesis and, in some aspects, these mouse models show similarities to the human condition. Initial attempts using the neurofibromin homozygous null (Nf1−/−) mouse were unsuccessful as the mice were not viable. Later attempts were then made to study the haploinsufficient mice (Nf1+/− mouse). Nf1+/− mice displayed little to no skeletal phenotype, despite demonstrating some dysregulation of isolated osteoblasts in vitro, thus limiting the use of this mouse to model the human NF1 condition (132). In an effort to study the role of neurofibromin at different stages of skeletogenesis, various groups have employed the use of transgenic models in which Nf1 is eliminated in specific cell types like undifferentiated mesenchymal cells, osteochondroprogenitors, osteoprogenitors, osteoblasts and osteocytes. Nf1flox/flox mice crossed with Prx1-cre mice results in the inactivation of Nf1 in undifferentiated mesenchymal cells in the developing limb (133-135). These mice demonstrated bowing of the tibia and growth retardation, as well as increased porosity, osteoidosis, decreased stiffness, and reduced bone mineral content, consistent with the human condition (133). Fracture healing was also impaired in Nf1 flox/flox/Prx1-cre mice, as was muscle development, resulting in muscle fibrosis and reduced numbers of muscle fibers (134, 135). Thus, multiple cells types can ultimately be impacted in the limb if Nf1 is eliminated from undifferentiated mesenchymal cells prenatally. When Nf1 is silenced in osteochondroprogenitors (Nf1flox/flo/Col2a1–cre), impaired bone mineralization, bone strength and growth retardation are observed (136). In addition, Nf1flox/−/Col2.3-cre mice demonstrate specific abnormalities in the lumbar vertebrae, similar to changes noted in the axial skeleton of humans with NF1 (137). When Nf1 is silenced in osteoprogenitors there have been some incongruences in outcomes depending on if Nf1flox/flox mice are crossed with Col1a1-cre or Osx-cre mice. Nf1 flox/flox/Col1a1-cre mice display high bone mass and an increase in bone formation, along with increased osteoid and bone turnover (138). In contrast, when Nf1 ablation was induced in osteoprogenitors in the Nf1 flox/flox/Osx-cre mouse at post–natal day 14, observations included increased osteoid and cortical porosity, and lower bone mass, cortical thickness, and weaker bones (136). Neurofibromin has also recently been shown to be active in mature osteocytes. Abrogation of Nf1 in osteocytes (Nf1 flox/flox/DMP-1-cre) reveled a remarkable metabolic bone phenotype, including high serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) levels, hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, and increased PTH (139). The bones of these mice demonstrated osteoidosis, reduced bone formation rate, increased porosity, and even spontaneous fractures. Overall, with some exceptions, these models do demonstrate certain skeletal characteristics commonly seen in NF1 in humans, including long-bone bowing, altered bone formation, and decreased long-bone length, and they suggest that osteoidosis/osteomalacia may be pivotal in the pathophysiology of NF1-related osteopathy. These studies also highlight that the timing of ablation (prenatally vs postnatally) as well as the cre-construct used may contribute to variability in skeletal outcomes and phenotypes.
3.2. NS
Several mouse models have provided a better understanding of how gain-of-function mutations in the Ptpn11 gene (encoding SHP2; and accounting for ~50% of NS in humans) can result in skeletal complications in NS. Mice heterozygous for the NS-associated D61G mutation in Ptpn11 demonstrated several skeletal features consistent with NS, including decreased body growth and cranio-facial anomalies, including a shortened skull length and triangular facial appearance (140). The growth delay noted in the D61G mutant mice has been linked to lower circulating concentrations of IGF-1; however, other work suggests there is a primary defect in the growth plate that is not amenable to IGF-1 therapy (141, 142). When another NS-associated Q79R mutation was expressed in neural crest cells, again the length of the skull was shortened, as was the jaw, features that commonly occur in the human condition (143). Kras mutations have also been explored in mouse models of NS. Expression of the NS-associated Kras V14I and T58I resulted in abnormalities of growth, along with craniofacial dysmorphia characterized by a reduced skull length, triangular facial appearance, blunter snout, and wider interorbital separation (144, 145). Many of the mouse models of NS are complimented by studies in zebra fish, which have demonstrated and confirmed that mutations in Ptpn11 and Kras can result in skeletal anomalies (146-148). To date, most of the studies using NS mouse models have focused on craniofacial abnormalities and growth delay; thus, bone microarchitecture, quality and strength are currently understudied.
3.3. CS
Only a few studies using mouse models of CS have examined skeletal consequences associated with mutations in the HRAS gene, the cause of Costello Syndrome (CS). Studies to date have reported on knock-in mouse models of the G12V HRAS mutation that is constitutively active; however, this specific mutation, while commonly found in cancers, is rarely the cause for CS. Therefore, there may be some limitations in drawing conclusions about specific outcomes. Nevertheless, two different approaches to expressing the G12V mutation resulted in similar dental defects, along with facial malformations impacting the nasal bridge, nasal septum and jaw bones, corresponding to clinical features of CS (149, 150). The tooth defects have been shown to evolve from dysfunctional ameloblasts and production of enamel that is hypo-mineralized (151). While these limited studies are informative, additional models using more relevant HRAS mutations may provide additional insights into skeletal development in CS.
3.4. CFCS
Germline mutations in the BRAF, MAP2k1, and MAP2k2 have been shown to be causative in CFCS and there are a few examples of how these mutations can be explored in mouse models. For instance, expression of BRAF L597V leads to increased kinase activity and facial abnormalities (152). Similarly, BRAF V600E allele expression in mice leads to facial dysmorphia and growth retardation (153). In another mouse model of CFCS, wherein the most frequent mutation in CFCS (BRAF Q257R) was expressed, the mutation proved to be lethal prenatally or shortly after birth, yet the mice demonstrated craniofacial anomalies (154). A follow-up study of the same mutation, but expressed on a different genetic background, revealed that facial dysmorphia was observed in mature mice (155). Furthermore, the growth retarded BRAF Q241R mice demonstrated reduced growth plate width as well as decreased serum levels of IGF-1 and its major serum binding protein, IGF binding protein 3, which may be relatable to the growth constriction noted in the BRAF Q257R mouse and is similar to what has been reported in the NS mouse model (156). Products of the Map2k1 and Map2k2 genes in mice, MEK1 and MEK2, respectively, have been shown to be necessary in osteoblasts for normal skeletal development, while over-activity of MEK1 in osteoprogenitors can lead to extra-cortical bone formation, osteoidosis, and increased porosity (157, 158). MEK1 Y130C is the most common MEK1 mutation reported in CFCS in humans. Its expression caused cranial abnormalities and the mutation was not lethal; however, more detail on skeletal outcomes were not reported (159). Overall, these studies suggest that most mutations that have been reported in the human condition of CFCS are amenable to being studied in mouse models and that future studies may reveal more detail on skeletal outcomes as well as mechanisms involved in those outcomes.
4. The RAS/MAPK signaling pathways in RASopathies
The Ras family (KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS) of small GTPases serves as a key node linking extracellular stimuli, i.e., growth factors, cytokines, extracellular matrix, and mechanical loading, to the MAPK intracellular signaling pathway, culminating in cellular responses such as replication, growth, differentiation, senescence, and death. Mutations within the RASopathy spectrum result in activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway via inactivation of inhibitors of the RAS/MAPK pathway, disruption of autoinhibitory intramolecular interactions within pathway activators, decreased degradation of RAS proteins, or promotion of transphosphorylation and activation of kinases within the pathway.
RAS/MAPK pathway activation is initiated by ligand binding to receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), receptor dimerization, and autophosphorylation on tyrosine residues. Phosphotyrosine residues recruit growth factor receptor bound 2 (GRB2) and it’s binding partner SOS to the inner cell membrane proximal region. SOS is a RAS-guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RAS-GEF), promoting exchange of bound GDP for GTP within RAS, forming the active RAS-GTP complex. SOS mutations associated with NS disrupt intramolecular autoinhibitory interactions within SOS, promoting increased GDP – GTP exchange in RAS. RAS mutants in NS, CFCS and CS affect RAS activity predominantly by reducing guanine nucleotide binding and/or intrinsic GAP activity with a recent study reporting that some RAS mutations associated with NS may bind to SOS in such a way as to favor allosteric SOS autoactivation and thus increased activation of RAS (160).
Additional RAS regulatory proteins SHP2, p120GAP, NF1, and LZTR1 have been reported to be mutated in the RASopathies. SHP2 is mutated in NS and NSML, with mutations clustering in regions that disrupt intramolecular autoinhibitory interaction between the SH2 and phosphotyrosine phosphatase (PTP) domains, destabilizing the inactive form, and allowing SHP2 PTP activity to increase. Active SHP2 dephosphorylates autoinhibitory phosphotyrosines within RAS-GTP (161, 162), decreasing binding of RAS inhibitor p120GAP (protein product of Rasa1 gene) and increasing binding of RAF (161), a downstream mediator of the MAPK pathway. Non-functional mutations of p120GAP and another RAS-GAP, NF1, are associated with CM-AVM and NF1, respectively, due to reduced extrinsic RAS-GAP activity and increased RAS-MAPK pathway activity. LZTR1, leucine zipper-like transcriptional regulator 1, is a component of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, which has recently been shown to facilitate ubiquitination and degradation of RAS proteins. Dominant mutated forms of LZTR1 appear to be associated with increased levels of RAS proteins (163), thereby increasing RAS-MAPK signaling, possibly due to reduced ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation. The mechanism is unclear regarding how recessive mutant forms of LZTR1 may increase RAS-MAPK signaling, although interaction between LZTR1 and other proteins implicated in RASopathies (RAF1, SHOC2, PP1) have been reported to promote inhibitory RAF1 Ser259 phosphorylation (164), which is reduced by some mutations within the complex.
Activated RAS binding to the RAS binding domain (RBD) of RAF1 recruits RAF1 to the cell membrane and triggers a conformational change, dephosphorylation of Ser259 of RAF1 by protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and phosphorylation of multiple sites within RAF1, relieving autoinhibition of the intrinsic kinase domain. Missense mutations of PPP1CB, encoding the catalytic subunit of PP1, have been reported in patients having phenotypic characteristics similar to the rare NS variant, Noonan-like syndrome with loose anagen hair (NS-LAH) (165). At this time, the functional implications of these mutations have not been determined.
Mutation of RAF1 Ser259 or nearby amino acids represents a large group of activating RAF1 mutations in NS and NSML (166, 167), in which autoinhibition of RAF1 occurs possibly due to reduced binding to 14-3-3 protein and resulting decreased stabilization of an inactive RAF1 conformation (168). A recent report has demonstrated that 14-3-3 protein encoding gene YWHAZ may be a new RASopathy-associated allele, with the mutant protein able to bind RAF1 with higher affinity than the wild-type protein, possibly helping to dimerize RAF1 and making RAF1 activation more efficient (169). SHOC2, which is mutated in NS, contains multiple leucine rich repeats and is a scaffolding protein linking RAS-GTP to RAF and also serves as a regulatory subunit of PP1C, which dephosphorylates the regulatory serine residue in RAF1. A p.S2G mutation in SHOC2 is believed to promote myristoylation of SHOC2, causing persistent localization of SHOC2 to the cell membrane where it can more readily and constitutively promote dephosphorylation and activation of RAF1 (54).
Clustering of RAF at the cell membrane promotes Raf transphosphorylation [reviewed in (170)]. Interestingly, in some cases of NS, CFCS and NSML, kinase impaired versions of BRAF and RAF1 have been identified. Contrary to the supposition that impairment of kinase activity would reduce signaling through the RAS-MAPK pathway, kinase impaired mutations appear to promote BRAF/RAF1 isoform homo- and heterodimerization, increasing kinase transactivation and thus increasing RAS-MAPK pathway activation (171). Interestingly, the vast majority of somatic tumorigenic BRAF mutations occur in the kinase domain. It remains to be determined whether similar mutations in NS, NSML, and CFCS are more prone to develop cancer compared to mutations in other BRAF domains (170).
Activated RAF1/BRAF recruits MEK1/MEK2 and phosphorylates the proteins on two serine residues (Ser 218 and Ser 222). Missense mutations in MEK1 and MEK2 associated with CFCS have been studied and shown to activate kinase activity (117, 172). Activated MEK1/MEK2 phosphorylate and activate ERK1/ERK2, which phosphorylate a wide variety of effector proteins such as transcription factors and protein kinases, which ultimately regulate cell proliferation, growth, and differentiation.
Activated RAS-GTP is specifically phosphorylated by SRC on tyrosine residues, inactivating RAS-GTP. This phosphorylation inhibits BRAF/RAF1 binding and promotes binding of a GAP protein (p120-GAP, or possibly NF1) (161). RAS Tyr64 phosphorylation reduces association of GEF activity (173). SHP2 can dephosphorylate RAS tyrosine residues, returning the RAS-GTP to an active state. Multiple skeletal cell types including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and chondrocytes are impacted by RAS/MAPK signaling. (174-176).
Mutation of the SPRED1 EVH1 domain eliminates SPRED1 inhibition of Ras-mediated activation of RAF1 (177). Mutations are usually truncations and loss of function. SPRED1 may also normally function by binding to NF1, recruiting it to the cell membrane in proximity to RAS, where NF1 can exert its negative regulation of RAS activity (178). Hirata et al. showed that Legius Syndrome missense mutants of SPRED1 within the EVH1 domain have reduced binding to NF1, thus recruiting less NF1 to the membrane and resulting in reduced GAP activity toward RAS (179).
5. RAS/MAPK signaling molecules involved in RASopathies and their effects on bone cells
Many components of the RAS-MAPK pathway play an important role in proliferation, differentiation, and survival of osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoclasts, and chondrocytes. Mineralized bone is produced by the action of osteoblasts, which derive from mesenchymal progenitors that differentiate into osteoblasts and ultimately bone-encased osteocytes. The skeleton is continuously remodeled by the coordinated activity of osteoclasts, which remove mineralized bone matrix, and osteoblasts, which replace the mineralized matrix. An imbalance in skeletal remodeling caused by a reduction in osteoblast numbers or activity, an increase in osteoblast death, or increased activity of bone resorbing osteoclasts can lead to reductions in mineralized bone and osteoporosis. Linear growth occurs due to the coordinated proliferation, hypertrophy, calcification, and death of growth plate chondrocytes. Several of the RASopathy-related proteins have been studied in the context of their activities in osteoblasts, osteoclasts and/or chondrocytes, as discussed below.
5.1. RAS
RAS activity likely regulates osteoblasts differently depending on the stage of differentiation. For example, Papaioannou et al. (180) showed that expression of an oncogenic KRAS protein in COL2-positive osteoprogenitors increased bone marrow stromal cell proliferation, the number of COL2 positive progenitor cells and their descendants, and trabecular bone mass, all of which was dependent on a functional MAPK pathway. In contrast, expression of oncogenic KRAS in more mature osterix (OSX)- or COL1-positive osteoblasts did not increase the number of descendant cells or trabecular mass. Growth factor stimulation of RAS can also promote or inhibit osteoblast differentiation depending on the timing and duration of growth factor stimulation. Peak expression of epiregulin and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF) correlates with the proliferative phase in MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts, with expression waning during mineralization (181). When exogenous HB-EGF is present continuously, proliferation is favored, but differentiation is severely attenuated, an effect that is reversed by dominant negative RAS (181) and is possibly mediated due to antagonism of BMP signaling (182). In contrast, RAS activity is required for expression of runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) in a strontium treated C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cell line (183). The RAS-related protein MRAS, in which mutations have recently been implicated in NS, is sufficient to induce osteoblastic differentiation of C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cells, while reduced expression of MRAS inhibited osteoblastic differentiation (184). Moreover, constitutively active MRAS was capable of inducing trans-differentiation of C2C12 myocytes into osteoblasts, an activity that was blunted by inhibitors of p38 and JNK kinases, but not MEK1/MEK2 inhibitors.
Bone development requires migration of mesenchymal stem cells in response to gradients in chemotactic factors released from the surrounding matrix as well as mechanical signals received from the matrix through integrin-collagen interactions. Jiang et al. have shown that connective tissue growth factor-induced migration of mesenchymal stem cells in vivo and MC3T3-E1 cells in vitro resulted in RAS activation downstream of integrin alpha V and was inhibited by RAS inhibitor salirasib (185). Kanno et al. have shown that RAS activity was required for stretch-induced ERK activation and upregulation of RUNX2 in the MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cell line (186).
Osteoporosis with increased bone resorption has been documented in some of the RASopathies. Macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) act in concert to promote proliferation, survival and differentiation of multinucleate bone resorbing osteoclasts from monocytic cell precursors (187). Activation of the RAS pathway in response to M-CSF and RANKL is important for osteoclast differentiation from mononuclear cells (188). M-CSF binding to the colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (c-FMS) triggers RAS activation and subsequent activation of MEK/ERK and PI3K signaling pathways, which is necessary for monocyte proliferation and survival (189). Interestingly, RANKL expression in osteoblasts is suppressed by mechanical stimulation in a mechanism that requires HRAS activity, which would be predicted to reduce RANKL-dependent osteoclast differentiation (190).
5.2. BRAF
BRAF activation in response to WNT3a mediated signaling activates the MAPK pathway and results in chondrocyte de-differentiation (191). Using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal cells produced from a CFCS patient harboring a mutant BRAF protein, Choi et al. (192) demonstrated that in vitro osteoblast differentiation was impaired and correlated with activation of MAPK and increased phosphorylation of SMAD2, while SMAD1 phosphorylation was decreased. Defective osteoblast differentiation was rescued by inhibiting MAPK or SMAD2 activation, or by inducing SMAD1 phosphorylation, suggesting a possible treatment paradigm to rescue impaired bone development in CFCS patients with BRAF mutations. Provot et al. (193) reported that ARAF and BRAF are dispensable for endochondral bone formation by knocking out the two isoforms in the chondrocyte lineage. CRAF is the predominant isoform expressed in hypertrophic growth plate chondrocytes. Papaioannou et al. knocked out ARAF, BRAF, and CRAF in chondrocytes in mice and showed that chondrocytes underwent reduced apoptosis, causing expansion of the hypertrophic zone and decreased vascular invasion (194). In a separate study, Liu et al. (195) knocked out CRAF in chondrocytes and showed that VEGF production was reduced, possibly explaining reduced growth plate vascular invasion and expansion of the hypertrophic chondrocyte zone. Patients with activating mutations in RAF family members would be expected to have increased chondrocyte apoptosis and attenuated expansion of the hypertrophic zone, potentially resulting in impaired endochondral ossification and growth. Hutchinson et al. (196) described the role of ERK/MAPK and p38 MAPK in chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation in which proliferation is favored when ERK/MAPK activity dominates over that of p38, while greater p38 activity promotes differentiation and suppresses proliferation in part via direct inhibition of RAF. RAF activity in chondrocytes may promote differentiation and support endochondral bone formation via upregulation of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21/WAF1, although hyperactivation of this pathway may result in premature slowing of chondrocyte proliferation, leading to shortened growth plates and impaired endochondral bone formation. Osteoblast ARAF and CRAF were identified as critical mediators of MAPK activation in response to mechanical stretch (197), working to promote stretch-induced differentiation (ARAF) or survival (CRAF). BRAF was identified as a mediator of cAMP induced ERK activation and cell proliferation in cultured osteoblast cell lines (198, 199).
5.3. /SHP2
Targeted deletion of Ptpn11 encoding SHP2 in the myelomonocytic lineage showed that myelomonocytic deletion of Ptpn11 caused decreased M-CSF induced ERK1/2 activation and mild osteopetrosis in a mouse model (200). Ptpn11 has also been deleted in osteocalcin-expressing osteoblasts and chondrocytes, which resulted in profound reductions in cortical and trabecular bone as well as decreased bone strength, possibly due to reduced RUNX2 and Osterix transcriptional activity (201). Wang et al. (201) also demonstrated that SHP2-deficient mice had increased osteoclast activity, possibly due to increased RANKL expression in osteoblasts and chondrocytes. Ramifications of SHP2 deficiency in cartilage include development of enchondromas and exostoses, as well as abnormal expansion of prehypertrophic chondrocytes in the growth plate (201-203). Tajan et al. (142) described hyperactivation of the RAS/MAPK pathway and reductions in growth plate length in SHP2 mutant mice, primarily due to a shorter hypertrophic zone. Interestingly, treating SHP2 mutant mice with statins improved growth plate architecture in vivo and chondrocyte differentiation in vitro.
5.4. NF1
Neurofibromin is expressed throughout development in mouse periosteal osteoblasts and osteoclasts, cortical bone osteocytes, and all stages of chondrocyte maturation, with the notable exception of proliferating chondrocytes, where expression is low to undetectable (204). Heterozygous loss of Nf1 function in mouse embryos resulted in increased ERK1/ERK2 phosphorylation in hypertrophic chondrocytes (204) and hyperactivation of RAS in osteoblast progenitors (132). Although the Nf1 haploinsufficient mouse has a very subtle osteopenic phenotype (132), committed osteoprogenitors derived from Nf1 haploinsufficient mice were shown to have increased proliferation rates accompanied by decreased expression of osteoblast differentiation marker genes (132, 205). Expression of the NF1 GAP-related domain, or inhibition of MEK, was sufficient to rescue in vitro osteoblast differentiation of committed osteoprogenitors derived from Nf1 haploinsufficient mice (205, 206), while Sullivan et al. (207) reported that inhibition of JNK activity, in combination with rhBMP-2, promoted osteoblast differentiation of NF1 deficient osteoprogenitors.
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1(FGFR1), FGFR3, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR1) initiate signaling events through the RAS-MAPK pathway that are critical for growth plate chondrocyte development [reviewed in (175)]. Neurofibromin expression overlaps with that of FGFR1 and FGFR3 in mouse growth plate chondrocytes (208), where deletion of Nf1 in Col2a1-positive chondrocytes and osteoprogenitors in mice results in constitutive activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway, reduced chondrocyte proliferation, shortened growth plates, defective endochondral bone formation, post-natal growth retardation, and other skeletal abnormalities seen in some humans with NF1 (209, 210). Nf1 deletion can restore normal MAPK/ERK signaling and aberrant growth plate organization in FGFR1 deficient hypertrophic chondrocytes, where it suppresses osteoclast development by way of reducing RANKL expression, and supports normal endochondral bone formation (208). Expression of constitutively active forms of MEK1 in growth plate chondrocytes, similar to deletion of Nf1, resulted in reduced chondrocyte hypertrophy and delayed endochondral bone formation (211).
Although most of the focus on skeletal issues in NF1 have been on bone forming cells, other data suggests that development of osteoclast lineage cells may also be affected by Nf1 haploinsufficiency (212). Rhodes et al. (213) showed that myeloid progenitor-restricted, but not mature osteoclast-restricted, Nf1 haploinsufficiency resulted in enhanced osteoclast development and resorptive activity, suggesting that regulation of RAS/MAPK activity is critical for early stages of osteoclastogenesis. Mononuclear cells isolated from mouse models of Nf1 haploinsufficiency or human NF1 patients exhibit increased osteoclast activity (214) (215, 216), although one study of isolated mononuclear cells from patients with or without NF1 showed that despite increased basal MAPK/ERK activation in cells from NF1 patients, there was no difference in osteoclast development in vitro (217).
Cell autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms may be operative in the increased osteoclast activity observed in Nf1+/− cells. Hypersensitivity of osteoclast precursors to M-CSF and RANKL, critical osteoclast developmental regulators, has been documented in Nf1 deficient cells (215). The bone resorbing capacity of osteoclasts is highly dependent on the actin cytoskeleton, which is regulated in part via the RHO/RAC family of small GTPases (218, 219), downstream mediators of the RAS pathway. Deletion of RAC1 restores to normal osteoclast formation and activity in Nf1+/− mice. Other studies have demonstrated that production of osteoclast regulatory proteins by cells other than osteoclasts may help to explain the osteoclast hyperactivation in NF1. Rhodes et al. (220) reported that serum concentration of TGF-β1 was increased in both a mouse model of osteoblast-restricted Nf1 haploinsufficiency and human patients with NF1, while Nf1 deficient osteoclasts were more responsive to TGF-β1 signaling, forming greater numbers of mature, bone resorbing osteoclasts. Osteopontin (OPN), another osteoblast product that can potentiate osteoclast development and activity, was shown to be produced at higher levels in Nf1+/− osteoblasts (132, 221), with Nf1+/− osteoblast conditioned media stimulating migration and bone resorption in vitro, an effect that could be attenuated by OPN neutralizing antibodies (221). Furthermore, Nf1+/− osteoclasts were more responsive to the potentiating effects of OPN (221). Overproduction of RANKL by Nf1−/− osteoprogenitors suggests that RANKL overproduction could also contribute to the enhanced osteoclastogenesis observed in NF1 (138).
5.5. MEK 1/2
In vitro studies of mouse calvarial osteoblasts expressing constitutively-active or dominant-inhibitory forms of MEK1 showed increased or decreased osteoblastic differentiation, respectively (222). Consistent with this observation, inhibition of MEK1/2 activity reduced osteoblast gene expression in MC3T3 mouse osteoblast cells (223). The osteoblast differentiation promoting activity of MEK/ERK signaling acts at least in part via phosphorylation of the critical osteoblast transcription factor, RUNX2 (222, 224, 225). Other studies have shown opposite effects of MEK/ERK signaling, i.e., chronic inhibition of MEK/ERK signaling was reported to stimulate osteoblast differentiation and mineral formation in vitro (226), while stimulation of MEK/ERK signaling by FGF-2 and EGF was shown to inhibit MC3T3 response to BMP-2, an effect that was reversed by dominant inhibitory RAS or a MEK1 inhibitor (182).
M-CSF and RANKL interact with c-FMS and RANK, respectively, to stimulate proliferation (M-CSF) and differentiation (RANKL) of osteoclast precursors (227, 228). Each pathway activates the MAPK/ERK cascade with different kinetics; c-FMS activation causes a strong, sustained activation of MAPK/ERK signaling that is linked to osteoclast progenitor proliferation, while RANKL-RANK induced MAPK/ERK signaling is weaker and biphasic that is linked to differentiation (reviewed in (176). Importantly, altering the dynamics of MAPK/ERK signaling as occurs in RASopathies would be predicted to lead to altered osteoclast differentiation. Consistent with the observation that overactive RAS-MAPK signaling promotes osteoclastogenesis, Wang et al. (200) showed that myelomonocytic deletion of SHP2 caused decreased M-CSF induced ERK1/2 activation and mild osteopetrosis in a mouse model.
5.6. CBL
CBL (or c-CBL; named after Casitas B-lineage Lymphoma) plays many roles in cellular functions, including ubiquitylation-dependent events and adaptor functions, and it is involved in multiple intracellular signaling events (229). The function of c-CBL has been studied in the context of skeletal biology, especially as it relates to osteoclast physiology. However, the specific c-CBL interactions most commonly explored in bone cells are those involving SRC and PI3K. When c-CBL is eliminated in osteoclasts, which would affect all its various functions, osteoclasts have been noted to have decreased motility and defective bone resorption capabilities (230). In relation to osteogenesis, c-CBL has been shown to be involved in osteoblast proliferation and differentiation (231). In fracture healing models c-CBL-PI3K interactions are important in the osteogenic response of activated periosteal cells in the healing process (232). Specific knock-in mutations known to occur in CBL-mediated RASopathies are yet to be explored in the context of specific bone cell types.
6. Potential therapeutic interventions
A number of investigations in mice have been carried out to understand the underlying mechanisms and signaling pathways that manifest in skeletal consequences of RASopathies. These studies have inevitably led to intervention studies to determine if targeted approaches could be used to intervene in preventing skeletal pathology in mouse models of RASopathies. Increased RAS-MAPK signaling in NF1 was shown to cause accumulation of inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), an inhibitor of hydroxyapatite formation as a result of increased expression of genes known to regulate pyrophosphate synthesis (136). This pathway was subsequently targeted in mice lacking neurofibromin in osteochondroprogenitors or osteoblasts using asfotase alfa enzyme (human tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme) therapy, resulting in improvements in stature, bone mineralization and strength in these mice, thus providing evidence that bone mineralization defects in NF1 might be modifiable (136). In a single case report, asfotase alfa was used in conjunction with zolendronic acid after spinal surgery in an individual with NF1. Good healing was reported; however, it was not possible to know what specific role asfotase alfa has in the healing process (233). Fracture healing, which is impaired in mouse models in which neurofibromin is ablated in osteoprogenitors, is improved when co-therapy with a MEK inhibitor and BMP2 is used (234). Other studies exploring specifically the role that hyperactivity of TGF-β may play in skeletal deficits in NF1 have shown that a TGF-β receptor 1 kinase inhibitor improves bone mass deficits and fracture healing in the in Nf1flox/− /COL2.3-cre mouse (220). Prenatal inhibition of the RAS-MAPK pathway has also been successful in preventing some of the skeletal deficits observed in mice in which neurofibromin is ablated in osteoprogenitors (209), as well is in mouse models of Noonan Syndrome (143, 144) and CFC (154). Together, these studies suggest that specific skeletal deficits observed in RASopathies can be targeted from a pharmacologic approach; however, specificity and off-target effects of these potential therapies, as well as the optimal window for their application, remain outstanding considerations and limitations to advancing their use in humans.
7. Summary
RASopathies are an ever expanding group of complex phenotypes representing a wide range of mutations in critical signaling molecules functioning within the RAS/MAPK pathway. There can be significant overlap in phenotype amongst different RASopathies, yet each presents also with unique features. Because the RAS/MAPK pathway is important in normal skeletogenesis, the skeleton is commonly affected in many RASopathies as described herein. Despite understanding more about the specific genetic mutations involved in each RASopathy, many questions still remain as to why skeletal phenotypes vary amongst RASopathies and even within the same RASopathy; which bone cell types are most affected by specific mutations and how they affect their behavior; why specific bones within the skeleton are affected more than others, and what could be effective and safe treatments to manage the skeletal outcomes of RAS/MAPK mutations.
HIGHLIGHTS.
RASopathies are caused by germline mutations in the Ras/MAPK pathway
RASopathies exhibit craniofacial, cardiac, and neurodevelopmental features
RASopathies demonstrate overlapping yet distinct musculoskeletal phenotypes
RAS/MAPK signaling is integral for osteoblast, osteoclast, and chondrocyte biology
Mouse models of RASopathies display musculoskeletal findings similar to humans
9. Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the illustrations (Figures 1-3) contributed by Tom Dolan and Matthew Hazzard, Medical Illustrators, University of Kentucky. The authors dedicate this manuscript to the memory of Dr. Jacqueline Noonan, a brilliant clinician, a devoted educator and mentor, a dedicated leader, a tireless colleague, and most of all, a true friend to so many of us at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics.
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health to J.L.F. (R56DK084045). Additional funding was provided by the University of Kentucky Barnstable Brown Diabetes Center.
Footnotes
Duality of Interests:
The authors have no financial or personal conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
LITERATURE CITED
- 1.Rauen KA. The RASopathies. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2013;14:355–69. Epub 2013/07/24. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153523. PubMed PMID: 23875798; PMCID: PMC4115674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tidyman WE, Rauen KA. The RASopathies: developmental syndromes of Ras/MAPK pathway dysregulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19(3):230–6. Epub 2009/05/27. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.04.001. PubMed PMID: 19467855; PMCID: PMC2743116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neurofibromatosis. Natl Inst Health Consens Dev Conf Consens Statement. 1987;6(12):1–7. Epub 1987/07/13. PubMed PMID: 3119994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: neurofibromatosis. Bethesda, Md., USA, July 13-15, 1987. Neurofibromatosis. 1988;1(3):172–8. Epub 1988/01/01. PubMed PMID: 3152465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miller DT, Freedenberg D, Schorry E, Ullrich NJ, Viskochil D, Korf BR, Council On G, American College Of Medical G, Genomics. Health Supervision for Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Pediatrics. 2019;143(5). Epub 2019/04/24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0660. PubMed PMID: 31010905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ly KI, Blakeley JO. The Diagnosis and Management of Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103(6):1035–54. Epub 2019/10/05. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.07.004. PubMed PMID: 31582003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Evans DG, O'Hara C, Wilding A, Ingham SL, Howard E, Dawson J, Moran A, Scott-Kitching V, Holt F, Huson SM. Mortality in neurofibromatosis 1: in North West England: an assessment of actuarial survival in a region of the UK since 1989. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(11):1187–91. Epub 2011/06/23. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.113. PubMed PMID: 21694737; PMCID: PMC3198144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Evans DG, Howard E, Giblin C, Clancy T, Spencer H, Huson SM, Lalloo F. Birth incidence and prevalence of tumor-prone syndromes: estimates from a UK family genetic register service. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A(2):327–32. Epub 2010/01/19. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33139. PubMed PMID: 20082463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Williams VC, Lucas J, Babcock MA, Gutmann DH, Korf B, Maria BL. Neurofibromatosis type 1 revisited. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):124–33. Epub 2009/01/02. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3204. PubMed PMID: 19117870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Delucia TA, Yohay K, Widmann RF. Orthopaedic aspects of neurofibromatosis: update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23(1):46–52. Epub 2010/12/15. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834230ce. PubMed PMID: 21150444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Virdis R, Street ME, Bandello MA, Tripodi C, Donadio A, Villani AR, Cagozzi L, Garavelli L, Bernasconi S. Growth and pubertal disorders in neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2003;16 Suppl 2:289–92. Epub 2003/05/06. PubMed PMID: 12729406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Szudek J, Birch P, Friedman JM. Growth in North American white children with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). J Med Genet. 2000;37(12):933–8. Epub 2000/01/11. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.12.933. PubMed PMID: 11106357; PMCID: PMC1734506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ferner RE. The neurofibromatoses. Pract Neurol. 2010;10(2):82–93. Epub 2010/03/24. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.206532. PubMed PMID: 20308235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Soucy EA, van Oppen D, Nejedly NL, Gao F, Gutmann DH, Hollander AS. Height assessments in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Child Neurol. 2013;28(3):303–7. Epub 2012/07/04. doi: 10.1177/0883073812446310. PubMed PMID: 22752476; PMCID: PMC3947790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Klein MJ, Slopis JK. Growth hormone deficiency in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 without suprasellar lesions. Pediatr Neurol. 2000;22(5):355–8. Epub 2000/07/29. doi: 10.1016/s0887-8994(00)00123-5. PubMed PMID: 10913726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zessis NR, Gao F, Vadlamudi G, Gutmann DH, Hollander AS. Height Growth Impairment in Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Is Characterized by Decreased Pubertal Growth Velocity in Both Sexes. J Child Neurol. 2018;33(12):762–6. Epub 2018/07/17. doi: 10.1177/0883073818786807. PubMed PMID: 30009646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Alwan S, Armstrong L, Joe H, Birch PH, Szudek J, Friedman JM. Associations of osseous abnormalities in Neurofibromatosis 1. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(12):1326–33. Epub 2007/05/17. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31754. PubMed PMID: 17506102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Crawford AH, Schorry EK. Neurofibromatosis update. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(3):413–23. Epub 2006/05/04. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000217719.10728.39. PubMed PMID: 16670560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Trovo-Marqui AB, Goloni-Bertollo EM, Valerio NI, Pavarino-Bertelli EC, Muniz MP, Teixeira MF, Antonio JR, Tajara EH. High frequencies of plexiform neurofibromas, mental retardation, learning difficulties, and scoliosis in Brazilian patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005;38(9):1441–7. Epub 2005/09/03. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2005000900020. PubMed PMID: 16138229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Prudhomme L, Delleci C, Trimouille A, Chateil JF, Prodhomme O, Goizet C, Van Gils J. Severe Thoracic and Spinal Bone Abnormalities in neurofibromatosis type 1. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63(4):103815. Epub 2019/11/30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103815. PubMed PMID: 31783133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gutmann DH, Ferner RE, Listernick RH, Korf BR, Wolters PL, Johnson KJ. Neurofibromatosis type 1. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17004. Epub 2017/02/24. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.4. PubMed PMID: 28230061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Durrani AA, Crawford AH, Chouhdry SN, Saifuddin A, Morley TR. Modulation of spinal deformities in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(1):69–75. Epub 2000/01/27. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200001010-00013. PubMed PMID: 10647163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rieley MB, Stevenson DA, Viskochil DH, Tinkle BT, Martin LJ, Schorry EK. Variable expression of neurofibromatosis 1 in monozygotic twins. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(3):478–85. Epub 2011/02/22. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33851. PubMed PMID: 21337692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Van Royen K, Brems H, Legius E, Lammens J, Laumen A. Prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 in congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175(9):1193–8. Epub 2016/08/16. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2757-z. PubMed PMID: 27519821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brekelmans C, Hollants S, De Groote C, Sohier N, Marechal M, Geris L, Luyten FP, Ginckels L, Sciot R, de Ravel T, De Smet L, Lammens J, Legius E, Brems H. Neurofibromatosis type 1-related pseudarthrosis: Beyond the pseudarthrosis site. Hum Mutat. 2019;40(10):1760–7. Epub 2019/05/09. doi: 10.1002/humu.23783. PubMed PMID: 31066482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Monroe CL, Dahiya S, Gutmann DH. Dissecting Clinical Heterogeneity in Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Annu Rev Pathol. 2017;12:53–74. Epub 2017/01/31. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-052016-100228. PubMed PMID: 28135565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Friedrich RE, Stelljes C, Hagel C, Giese M, Scheuer HA. Dysplasia of the orbit and adjacent bone associated with plexiform neurofibroma and ocular disease in 42 NF-1 patients. Anticancer Res. 2010;30(5):1751–64. Epub 2010/07/02. PubMed PMID: 20592374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rauen KA, Huson SM, Burkitt-Wright E, Evans DG, Farschtschi S, Ferner RE, Gutmann DH, Hanemann CO, Kerr B, Legius E, Parada LF, Patton M, Peltonen J, Ratner N, Riccardi VM, van der Vaart T, Vikkula M, Viskochil DH, Zenker M, Upadhyaya M. Recent developments in neurofibromatoses and RASopathies: management, diagnosis and current and future therapeutic avenues. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A(1):1–10. Epub 2014/11/14. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36793. PubMed PMID: 25393061; PMCID: PMC4275383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stevenson DA, Moyer-Mileur LJ, Murray M, Slater H, Sheng X, Carey JC, Dube B, Viskochil DH. Bone mineral density in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr. 2007;150(1):83–8. Epub 2006/12/26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.10.048. PubMed PMID: 17188620; PMCID: PMC1808316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lodish MB, Dagalakis U, Sinaii N, Bornstein E, Kim A, Lokie KB, Baldwin AM, Reynolds JC, Dombi E, Stratakis CA, Widemann BC. Bone mineral density in children and young adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2012;19(6):817–25. Epub 2012/10/24. doi: 10.1530/ERC-12-0293. PubMed PMID: 23089139; PMCID: PMC4132947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Caffarelli C, Gonnelli S, Tanzilli L, Vivarelli R, Tamburello S, Balestri P, Nuti R. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis of type 1. J Clin Densitom. 2010;13(1):77–83. Epub 2010/02/23. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.10.002. PubMed PMID: 20171569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brunetti-Pierri N, Doty SB, Hicks J, Phan K, Mendoza-Londono R, Blazo M, Tran A, Carter S, Lewis RA, Plon SE, Phillips WA, O'Brian Smith E, Ellis KJ, Lee B. Generalized metabolic bone disease in Neurofibromatosis type I. Mol Genet Metab. 2008;94(1):105–11. Epub 2008/02/22. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.12.004. PubMed PMID: 18289904; PMCID: PMC2430595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dulai S, Briody J, Schindeler A, North KN, Cowell CT, Little DG. Decreased bone mineral density in neurofibromatosis type 1: results from a pediatric cohort. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(4):472–5. Epub 2007/05/22. doi: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000271310.87997.ae. PubMed PMID: 17513973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Poyrazoglu HG, Bas VN, Arslan A, Bastug F, Canpolat M, Per H, Gumus H, Kumandas S. Bone mineral density and bone metabolic markers' status in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;30(2):175–80. Epub 2017/01/27. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2016-0092. PubMed PMID: 28125404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tucker T, Schnabel C, Hartmann M, Friedrich RE, Frieling I, Kruse HP, Mautner VF, Friedman JM. Bone health and fracture rate in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). J Med Genet. 2009;46(4):259–65. Epub 2008/12/11. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.061895. PubMed PMID: 19066167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Petramala L, Giustini S, Zinnamosca L, Marinelli C, Colangelo L, Cilenti G, Formicuccia MC, D'Erasmo E, Calvieri S, Letizia C. Bone mineral metabolism in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (von Recklingausen disease). Arch Dermatol Res. 2012;304(4):325–31. Epub 2011/11/29. doi: 10.1007/s00403-011-1191-3. PubMed PMID: 22120694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Heerva E, Leinonen P, Kuorilehto T, Peltonen S, Poyhonen M, Vaananen K, Peltonen J. Neurofibromatosis 1-related osteopenia often progresses to osteoporosis in 12 years. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;92(1):23–7. Epub 2012/10/31. doi: 10.1007/s00223-012-9661-y. PubMed PMID: 23108390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Heerva E, Koffert A, Jokinen E, Kuorilehto T, Peltonen S, Aro HT, Peltonen J. A controlled register-based study of 460 neurofibromatosis 1 patients: increased fracture risk in children and adults over 41 years of age. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(11):2333–7. Epub 2012/06/14. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1685. PubMed PMID: 22692994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kuhnisch J, Seto J, Lange C, Schrof S, Stumpp S, Kobus K, Grohmann J, Kossler N, Varga P, Osswald M, Emmerich D, Tinschert S, Thielemann F, Duda G, Seifert W, El Khassawna T, Stevenson DA, Elefteriou F, Kornak U, Raum K, Fratzl P, Mundlos S, Kolanczyk M. Multiscale, converging defects of macro-porosity, microstructure and matrix mineralization impact long bone fragility in NF1. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86115. Epub 2014/01/28. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086115. PubMed PMID: 24465906; PMCID: PMC3897656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Seitz S, Schnabel C, Busse B, Schmidt HU, Beil FT, Friedrich RE, Schinke T, Mautner VF, Amling M. High bone turnover and accumulation of osteoid in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(1):119–27. Epub 2009/05/06. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0933-y. PubMed PMID: 19415373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Filopanti M, Verga U, Ulivieri FM, Giavoli C, Rodari G, Arosio M, Natacci F, Spada A. Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and Bone Metabolism in Patients Affected with Type 1 Neurofibromatosis (NF1). Calcif Tissue Int. 2019;104(2):207–13. Epub 2018/11/14. doi: 10.1007/s00223-018-0488-z. PubMed PMID: 30421324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kuorilehto T, Poyhonen M, Bloigu R, Heikkinen J, Vaananen K, Peltonen J. Decreased bone mineral density and content in neurofibromatosis type 1: lowest local values are located in the loadcarrying parts of the body. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(8):928–36. Epub 2004/11/20. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1801-4. PubMed PMID: 15551055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Noonan JA. Hypertelorism with Turner phenotype. A new syndrome with associated congenital heart disease. Am J Dis Child. 1968;116(4):373–80. Epub 1968/10/01. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1968.02100020377005. PubMed PMID: 4386970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tartaglia M, Gelb BD. Noonan syndrome and related disorders: genetics and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005;6:45–68. Epub 2005/08/30. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.6.080604.162305. PubMed PMID: 16124853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Noonan JA. Noonan syndrome and related disorders: alterations in growth and puberty. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006;7(4):251–5. Epub 2006/12/21. doi: 10.1007/s11154-006-9021-1. PubMed PMID: 17177115; PMCID: PMC1894828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tartaglia M, Mehler EL, Goldberg R, Zampino G, Brunner HG, Kremer H, van der Burgt I, Crosby AH, Ion A, Jeffery S, Kalidas K, Patton MA, Kucherlapati RS, Gelb BD. Mutations in PTPN11, encoding the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2001;29(4):465–8. Epub 2001/11/13. doi: 10.1038/ng772. PubMed PMID: 11704759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Roberts AE, Araki T, Swanson KD, Montgomery KT, Schiripo TA, Joshi VA, Li L, Yassin Y, Tamburino AM, Neel BG, Kucherlapati RS. Germline gain-of-function mutations in SOS1 cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2007;39(1):70–4. Epub 2006/12/05. doi: 10.1038/ng1926. PubMed PMID: 17143285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tartaglia M, Pennacchio LA, Zhao C, Yadav KK, Fodale V, Sarkozy A, Pandit B, Oishi K, Martinelli S, Schackwitz W, Ustaszewska A, Martin J, Bristow J, Carta C, Lepri F, Neri C, Vasta I, Gibson K, Curry CJ, Siguero JP, Digilio MC, Zampino G, Dallapiccola B, Bar-Sagi D, Gelb BD. Gain-of-function SOS1 mutations cause a distinctive form of Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2007;39(1):75–9. Epub 2006/12/05. doi: 10.1038/ng1939. PubMed PMID: 17143282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pandit B, Sarkozy A, Pennacchio LA, Carta C, Oishi K, Martinelli S, Pogna EA, Schackwitz W, Ustaszewska A, Landstrom A, Bos JM, Ommen SR, Esposito G, Lepri F, Faul C, Mundel P, Lopez Siguero JP, Tenconi R, Selicorni A, Rossi C, Mazzanti L, Torrente I, Marino B, Digilio MC, Zampino G, Ackerman MJ, Dallapiccola B, Tartaglia M, Gelb BD. Gain-of-function RAF1 mutations cause Noonan and LEOPARD syndromes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nat Genet. 2007;39(8):1007–12. Epub 2007/07/03. doi: 10.1038/ng2073. PubMed PMID: 17603483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Razzaque MA, Nishizawa T, Komoike Y, Yagi H, Furutani M, Amo R, Kamisago M, Momma K, Katayama H, Nakagawa M, Fujiwara Y, Matsushima M, Mizuno K, Tokuyama M, Hirota H, Muneuchi J, Higashinakagawa T, Matsuoka R. Germline gain-of-function mutations in RAF1 cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2007;39(8):1013–7. Epub 2007/07/03. doi: 10.1038/ng2078. PubMed PMID: 17603482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aoki Y, Niihori T, Banjo T, Okamoto N, Mizuno S, Kurosawa K, Ogata T, Takada F, Yano M, Ando T, Hoshika T, Barnett C, Ohashi H, Kawame H, Hasegawa T, Okutani T, Nagashima T, Hasegawa S, Funayama R, Nagashima T, Nakayama K, Inoue S, Watanabe Y, Ogura T, Matsubara Y. Gain-of-function mutations in RIT1 cause Noonan syndrome, a RAS/MAPK pathway syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93(1):173–80. Epub 2013/06/25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.021. PubMed PMID: 23791108; PMCID: PMC3710767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schubbert S, Zenker M, Rowe SL, Boll S, Klein C, Bollag G, van der Burgt I, Musante L, Kalscheuer V, Wehner LE, Nguyen H, West B, Zhang KY, Sistermans E, Rauch A, Niemeyer CM, Shannon K, Kratz CP. Germline KRAS mutations cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2006;38(3):331–6. Epub 2006/02/14. doi: 10.1038/ng1748. PubMed PMID: 16474405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cirstea IC, Kutsche K, Dvorsky R, Gremer L, Carta C, Horn D, Roberts AE, Lepri F, Merbitz-Zahradnik T, Konig R, Kratz CP, Pantaleoni F, Dentici ML, Joshi VA, Kucherlapati RS, Mazzanti L, Mundlos S, Patton MA, Silengo MC, Rossi C, Zampino G, Digilio C, Stuppia L, Seemanova E, Pennacchio LA, Gelb BD, Dallapiccola B, Wittinghofer A, Ahmadian MR, Tartaglia M, Zenker M. A restricted spectrum of NRAS mutations causes Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2010;42(1):27–9. Epub 2009/12/08. doi: 10.1038/ng.497. PubMed PMID: 19966803; PMCID: PMC3118669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cordeddu V, Di Schiavi E, Pennacchio LA, Ma'ayan A, Sarkozy A, Fodale V, Cecchetti S, Cardinale A, Martin J, Schackwitz W, Lipzen A, Zampino G, Mazzanti L, Digilio MC, Martinelli S, Flex E, Lepri F, Bartholdi D, Kutsche K, Ferrero GB, Anichini C, Selicorni A, Rossi C, Tenconi R, Zenker M, Merlo D, Dallapiccola B, Iyengar R, Bazzicalupo P, Gelb BD, Tartaglia M. Mutation of SHOC2 promotes aberrant protein N-myristoylation and causes Noonan-like syndrome with loose anagen hair. Nat Genet. 2009;41(9):1022–6. Epub 2009/08/18. doi: 10.1038/ng.425. PubMed PMID: 19684605; PMCID: PMC2765465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Martinelli S, De Luca A, Stellacci E, Rossi C, Checquolo S, Lepri F, Caputo V, Silvano M, Buscherini F, Consoli F, Ferrara G, Digilio MC, Cavaliere ML, van Hagen JM, Zampino G, van der Burgt I, Ferrero GB, Mazzanti L, Screpanti I, Yntema HG, Nillesen WM, Savarirayan R, Zenker M, Dallapiccola B, Gelb BD, Tartaglia M. Heterozygous germline mutations in the CBL tumor-suppressor gene cause a Noonan syndrome-like phenotype. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87(2):250–7. Epub 2010/07/14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.06.015. PubMed PMID: 20619386; PMCID: PMC2917705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Guemes M, Martin-Rivada A, Ortiz-Cabrera NV, Martos-Moreno GA, Pozo-Roman J, Argente J. LZTR1: Genotype Expansion in Noonan Syndrome. Horm Res Paediatr. 2019;92(4):269–75. Epub 2019/09/19. doi: 10.1159/000502741. PubMed PMID: 31533111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gelb BD, Tartaglia M. Noonan Syndrome with Multiple Lentigines. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA)1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sarkozy A, Carta C, Moretti S, Zampino G, Digilio MC, Pantaleoni F, Scioletti AP, Esposito G, Cordeddu V, Lepri F, Petrangeli V, Dentici ML, Mancini GM, Selicorni A, Rossi C, Mazzanti L, Marino B, Ferrero GB, Silengo MC, Memo L, Stanzial F, Faravelli F, Stuppia L, Puxeddu E, Gelb BD, Dallapiccola B, Tartaglia M. Germline BRAF mutations in Noonan, LEOPARD, and cardiofaciocutaneous syndromes: molecular diversity and associated phenotypic spectrum. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(4):695–702. Epub 2009/02/12. doi: 10.1002/humu.20955. PubMed PMID: 19206169; PMCID: PMC4028130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Stevenson DA, Yang FC. The musculoskeletal phenotype of the RASopathies. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C(2):90–103. Epub 2011/04/16. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30296. PubMed PMID: 21495174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bufalino A, Carrera M, Carlos R, Coletta RD. Giant cell lesions in noonan syndrome: case report and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2010;4(2):174–7. Epub 2010/04/13. doi: 10.1007/s12105-010-0178-2. PubMed PMID: 20383758; PMCID: PMC2878618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Neumann TE, Allanson J, Kavamura I, Kerr B, Neri G, Noonan J, Cordeddu V, Gibson K, Tzschach A, Kruger G, Hoeltzenbein M, Goecke TO, Kehl HG, Albrecht B, Luczak K, Sasiadek MM, Musante L, Laurie R, Peters H, Tartaglia M, Zenker M, Kalscheuer V. Multiple giant cell lesions in patients with Noonan syndrome and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17(4):420–5. Epub 2008/10/16. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.188. PubMed PMID: 18854871; PMCID: PMC2986220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cohen MM Jr., Gorlin RJ. Noonan-like/multiple giant cell lesion syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1991;40(2):159–66. Epub 1991/08/11. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320400208. PubMed PMID: 1897569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Noonan JA, Raaijmakers R, Hall BD. Adult height in Noonan syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2003;123A(1):68–71. Epub 2003/10/14. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20502. PubMed PMID: 14556249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ranke MB, Heidemann P, Knupfer C, Enders H, Schmaltz AA, Bierich JR. Noonan syndrome: growth and clinical manifestations in 144 cases. Eur J Pediatr. 1988;148(3):220–7. Epub 1988/12/01. doi: 10.1007/BF00441408. PubMed PMID: 3215198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shaw AC, Kalidas K, Crosby AH, Jeffery S, Patton MA. The natural history of Noonan syndrome: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(2):128–32. Epub 2006/09/23. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.104547. PubMed PMID: 16990350; PMCID: PMC2083343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Smpokou P, Tworog-Dube E, Kucherlapati RS, Roberts AE. Medical complications, clinical findings, and educational outcomes in adults with Noonan syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A(12):3106–11. Epub 2012/11/21. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35639. PubMed PMID: 23165751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Binder G. Noonan syndrome, the Ras-MAPK signalling pathway and short stature. Horm Res. 2009;71 Suppl 2:64–70. Epub 2009/05/07. doi: 10.1159/000192439. PubMed PMID: 19407499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wit JM, Oostdijk W, Losekoot M. Spectrum of insulin-like growth factor deficiency. Endocr Dev. 2012;23:30–41. Epub 2012/11/28. doi: 10.1159/000341739. PubMed PMID: 23182818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Carlsson M, Camacho-Hubner C, Rooman R. Treatment with Growth Hormone in Noonan Syndrome Observed during 25 Years of KIGS: Near Adult Height and Outcome Prediction. Horm Res Paediatr. 2019;91(1):46–55. Epub 2019/04/03. doi: 10.1159/000498859. PubMed PMID: 30939478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kirk JM, Betts PR, Butler GE, Donaldson MD, Dunger DB, Johnston DI, Kelnar CJ, Price DA, Wilton P, Group t U. Short stature in Noonan syndrome: response to growth hormone therapy. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84(5):440–3. Epub 2001/04/24. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.5.440. PubMed PMID: 11316696; PMCID: PMC1718750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.MacFarlane CE, Brown DC, Johnston LB, Patton MA, Dunger DB, Savage MO, McKenna WJ, Kelnar CJ. Growth hormone therapy and growth in children with Noonan's syndrome: results of 3 years' follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(5):1953–6. Epub 2001/05/10. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.5.7468. PubMed PMID: 11344190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kobayashi T, Aoki Y, Niihori T, Cave H, Verloes A, Okamoto N, Kawame H, Fujiwara I, Takada F, Ohata T, Sakazume S, Ando T, Nakagawa N, Lapunzina P, Meneses AG, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Wieczorek D, Kurosawa K, Mizuno S, Ohashi H, David A, Philip N, Guliyeva A, Narumi Y, Kure S, Tsuchiya S, Matsubara Y. Molecular and clinical analysis of RAF1 in Noonan syndrome and related disorders: dephosphorylation of serine 259 as the essential mechanism for mutant activation. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(3):284–94. Epub 2010/01/07. doi: 10.1002/humu.21187. PubMed PMID: 20052757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lee BH, Kim JM, Jin HY, Kim GH, Choi JH, Yoo HW. Spectrum of mutations in Noonan syndrome and their correlation with phenotypes. J Pediatr. 2011;159(6):1029–35. Epub 2011/07/26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.05.024. PubMed PMID: 21784453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sharland M, Burch M, McKenna WM, Paton MA. A clinical study of Noonan syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67(2):178–83. Epub 1992/02/01. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.2.178. PubMed PMID: 1543375; PMCID: PMC1793396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lee CK, Chang BS, Hong YM, Yang SW, Lee CS, Seo JB. Spinal deformities in Noonan syndrome: a clinical review of sixty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(10):1495–502. Epub 2001/10/27. PubMed PMID: 11679599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tartaglia M, Gelb BD, Zenker M. Noonan syndrome and clinically related disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25(1):161–79. Epub 2011/03/15. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2010.09.002. PubMed PMID: 21396583; PMCID: PMC3058199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Razzaque MA, Komoike Y, Nishizawa T, Inai K, Furutani M, Higashinakagawa T, Matsuoka R. Characterization of a novel KRAS mutation identified in Noonan syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A(3):524–32. Epub 2012/02/04. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34419. PubMed PMID: 22302539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Allanson JE. Noonan syndrome. J Med Genet. 1987;24(1):9–13. Epub 1987/01/01. doi: 10.1136/jmg.24.1.9. PubMed PMID: 3543368; PMCID: PMC1049850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Choudhry KS, Grover M, Tran AA, O'Brian Smith E, Ellis KJ, Lee BH. Decreased bone mineralization in children with Noonan syndrome: another consequence of dysregulated RAS MAPKinase pathway? Mol Genet Metab. 2012;106(2):237–40. Epub 2012/05/04. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.04.003. PubMed PMID: 22551697; PMCID: PMC3356458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Stevenson DA, Schwarz EL, Carey JC, Viskochil DH, Hanson H, Bauer S, Weng HY, Greene T, Reinker K, Swensen J, Chan RJ, Yang FC, Senbanjo L, Yang Z, Mao R, Pasquali M. Bone resorption in syndromes of the Ras/MAPK pathway. Clin Genet. 2011;80(6):566–73. Epub 2011/01/06. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01619.x. PubMed PMID: 21204800; PMCID: PMC3246507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Cao H, Alrejaye N, Klein OD, Goodwin AF, Oberoi S. A review of craniofacial and dental findings of the RASopathies. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017;20 Suppl 1:32–8. Epub 2017/06/24. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12144. PubMed PMID: 28643916; PMCID: PMC5942188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gorlin RJ, Anderson RC, Blaw M. Multiple lentigenes syndrome. Am J Dis Child. 1969;117(6):652–62. Epub 1969/06/01. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1969.02100030654006. PubMed PMID: 5771505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Digilio MC, Conti E, Sarkozy A, Mingarelli R, Dottorini T, Marino B, Pizzuti A, Dallapiccola B. Grouping of multiple-lentigines/LEOPARD and Noonan syndromes on the PTPN11 gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(2):389–94. Epub 2002/06/12. doi: 10.1086/341528. PubMed PMID: 12058348; PMCID: PMC379170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Sarkozy A, Digilio MC, Dallapiccola B. Leopard syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3:13. Epub 2008/05/29. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-3-13. PubMed PMID: 18505544; PMCID: PMC2467408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lodish MB, Stratakis CA. The differential diagnosis of familial lentiginosis syndromes. Fam Cancer. 2011;10(3):481–90. Epub 2011/05/04. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9446-x. PubMed PMID: 21538076; PMCID: PMC3417307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gelb BD, Tartaglia M. Noonan syndrome and related disorders: dysregulated RAS-mitogen activated protein kinase signal transduction. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15 Spec No 2:R220–6. Epub 2006/09/22. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl197. PubMed PMID: 16987887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Voron DA, Hatfield HH, Kalkhoff RK. Multiple lentigines syndrome. Case report and review of the literature. Am J Med. 1976;60(3):447–56. Epub 1976/03/01. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(76)90764-6. PubMed PMID: 1258892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Digilio MC, Sarkozy A, de Zorzi A, Pacileo G, Limongelli G, Mingarelli R, Calabro R, Marino B, Dallapiccola B. LEOPARD syndrome: clinical diagnosis in the first year of life. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(7):740–6. Epub 2006/03/09. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31156. PubMed PMID: 16523510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Cessans C, Ehlinger V, Arnaud C, Yart A, Capri Y, Barat P, Cammas B, Lacombe D, Coutant R, David A, Baron S, Weill J, Leheup B, Nicolino M, Salles JP, Verloes A, Tauber M, Cave H, Edouard T. Growth patterns of patients with Noonan syndrome: correlation with age and genotype. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(5):641–50. Epub 2016/02/24. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0922. PubMed PMID: 26903553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Rodriguez F, Ponce D, Berward FJ, Lopetegui B, Cassorla F, Aracena M. RAF1 variant in a patient with Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines and craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179(8):1598–602. Epub 2019/05/31. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61203. PubMed PMID: 31145547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.McDonald BS, Pigors M, Kelsell DP, O'Toole EA, Burkitt-Wright E, Kerr B, Batta K. Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines and associated craniosynostosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2018;43(3):357–9. Epub 2018/01/23. doi: 10.1111/ced.13329. PubMed PMID: 29356064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wooderchak-Donahue WL, Johnson P, McDonald J, Blei F, Berenstein A, Sorscher M, Mayer J, Scheuerle AE, Lewis T, Grimmer JF, Richter GT, Steeves MA, Lin AE, Stevenson DA, Bayrak-Toydemir P. Expanding the clinical and molecular findings in RASA1 capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26(10):1521–36. Epub 2018/06/13. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0196-1. PubMed PMID: 29891884; PMCID: PMC6138627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Orme CM, Boyden LM, Choate KA, Antaya RJ, King BA. Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation syndrome: review of the literature, proposed diagnostic criteria, and recommendations for management. Pediatr Dermatol. 2013;30(4):409–15. Epub 2013/05/15. doi: 10.1111/pde.12112. PubMed PMID: 23662773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Larralde M, Abad ME, Luna PC, Hoffner MV. Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation: a clinical review of 45 patients. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53(4):458–61. Epub 2013/10/31. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12040. PubMed PMID: 24168113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Eerola I, Boon LM, Mulliken JB, Burrows PE, Dompmartin A, Watanabe S, Vanwijck R, Vikkula M. Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation, a new clinical and genetic disorder caused by RASA1 mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73(6):1240–9. Epub 2003/11/26. doi: 10.1086/379793. PubMed PMID: 14639529; PMCID: PMC1180390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Revencu N, Fastre E, Ravoet M, Helaers R, Brouillard P, Bisdorff-Bresson A, Chung CWT, Gerard M, Dvorakova V, Irvine AD, Boon LM, Vikkula M. RASA1 mosaic mutations in patients with capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation. J Med Genet. 2020;57(1):48–52. Epub 2019/07/14. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106024. PubMed PMID: 31300548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hershkovitz D, Bergman R, Sprecher E. A novel mutation in RASA1 causes capillary malformation and limb enlargement. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008;300(7):385–8. Epub 2008/03/11. doi: 10.1007/s00403-008-0842-5. PubMed PMID: 18327598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Abe Y, Aoki Y, Kuriyama S, Kawame H, Okamoto N, Kurosawa K, Ohashi H, Mizuno S, Ogata T, Kure S, Niihori T, Matsubara Y, Costello, Japan CFCssgi. Prevalence and clinical features of Costello syndrome and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome in Japan: findings from a nationwide epidemiological survey. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A(5):1083–94. Epub 2012/04/13. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35292. PubMed PMID: 22495831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Gripp KW, Morse LA, Axelrad M, Chatfield KC, Chidekel A, Dobyns W, Doyle D, Kerr B, Lin AE, Schwartz DD, Sibbles BJ, Siegel D, Shankar SP, Stevenson DA, Thacker MM, Weaver KN, White SM, Rauen KA. Costello syndrome: Clinical phenotype, genotype, and management guidelines. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179(9):1725–44. Epub 2019/06/22. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61270. PubMed PMID: 31222966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Hennekam RC. Costello syndrome: an overview. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003;117C(1):42–8. Epub 2003/02/01. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10019. PubMed PMID: 12561057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Rauen KA. HRAS and the Costello syndrome. Clin Genet. 2007;71(2):101–8. Epub 2007/01/26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00743.x. PubMed PMID: 17250658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Aoki Y, Niihori T, Kawame H, Kurosawa K, Ohashi H, Tanaka Y, Filocamo M, Kato K, Suzuki Y, Kure S, Matsubara Y. Germline mutations in HRAS proto-oncogene cause Costello syndrome. Nat Genet. 2005;37(10):1038–40. Epub 2005/09/20. doi: 10.1038/ng1641. PubMed PMID: 16170316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Hinek A, Smith AC, Cutiongco EM, Callahan JW, Gripp KW, Weksberg R. Decreased elastin deposition and high proliferation of fibroblasts from Costello syndrome are related to functional deficiency in the 67-kD elastin-binding protein. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66(3):859–72. Epub 2000/03/11. doi: 10.1086/302829. PubMed PMID: 10712202; PMCID: PMC1288169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Yassir WK, Grottkau BE, Goldberg MJ. Costello syndrome: orthopaedic manifestations and functional health. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23(1):94–8. Epub 2002/12/25. PubMed PMID: 12499952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Reinker KA, Stevenson DA, Tsung A. Orthopaedic conditions in Ras/MAPK related disorders. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(5):599–605. Epub 2011/06/10. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318220396e. PubMed PMID: 21654472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Detweiler S, Thacker MM, Hopkins E, Conway L, Gripp KW. Orthopedic manifestations and implications for individuals with Costello syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A(8):1940–9. Epub 2013/07/03. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36047. PubMed PMID: 23813656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Stein RI, Legault L, Daneman D, Weksberg R, Hamilton J. Growth hormone deficiency in Costello syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;129A(2):166–70. Epub 2004/08/19. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30187. PubMed PMID: 15316968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.White SM, Graham JM Jr., Kerr B, Gripp K, Weksberg R, Cytrynbaum C, Reeder JL, Stewart FJ, Edwards M, Wilson M, Bankier A. The adult phenotype in Costello syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;136(2):128–35. Epub 2005/06/09. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30747. PubMed PMID: 15940703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Goodwin AF, Oberoi S, Landan M, Charles C, Massie JC, Fairley C, Rauen KA, Klein OD. Craniofacial and dental development in Costello syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(6):1425–30. Epub 2014/03/29. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36475. PubMed PMID: 24668879; PMCID: PMC4115793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.van der Burgt I, Kupsky W, Stassou S, Nadroo A, Barroso C, Diem A, Kratz CP, Dvorsky R, Ahmadian MR, Zenker M. Myopathy caused by HRAS germline mutations: implications for disturbed myogenic differentiation in the presence of constitutive HRas activation. J Med Genet. 2007;44(7):459–62. Epub 2007/04/07. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.049270. PubMed PMID: 17412879; PMCID: PMC2598013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Reynolds JF, Neri G, Herrmann JP, Blumberg B, Coldwell JG, Miles PV, Opitz JM. New multiple congenital anomalies/mental retardation syndrome with cardio-facio-cutaneous involvement--the CFC syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1986;25(3):413–27. Epub 1986/11/01. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320250303. PubMed PMID: 3789005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Pierpont ME, Magoulas PL, Adi S, Kavamura MI, Neri G, Noonan J, Pierpont EI, Reinker K, Roberts AE, Shankar S, Sullivan J, Wolford M, Conger B, Santa Cruz M, Rauen KA. Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management guidelines. Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):e1149–62. Epub 2014/09/03. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3189. PubMed PMID: 25180280; PMCID: PMC4179092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Rauen KA. Cardiofaciocutaneous Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA)1993. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Yoon G, Rosenberg J, Blaser S, Rauen KA. Neurological complications of cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(12):894–9. Epub 2007/11/28. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00894.x. PubMed PMID: 18039235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Armour CM, Allanson JE. Further delineation of cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome: clinical features of 38 individuals with proven mutations. J Med Genet. 2008;45(4):249–54. Epub 2007/11/28. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.054460. PubMed PMID: 18039946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Niihori T, Aoki Y, Narumi Y, Neri G, Cave H, Verloes A, Okamoto N, Hennekam RC, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Wieczorek D, Kavamura MI, Kurosawa K, Ohashi H, Wilson L, Heron D, Bonneau D, Corona G, Kaname T, Naritomi K, Baumann C, Matsumoto N, Kato K, Kure S, Matsubara Y. Germline KRAS and BRAF mutations in cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Nat Genet. 2006;38(3):294–6. Epub 2006/02/14. doi: 10.1038/ng1749. PubMed PMID: 16474404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Rodriguez-Viciana P, Tetsu O, Tidyman WE, Estep AL, Conger BA, Cruz MS, McCormick F, Rauen KA. Germline mutations in genes within the MAPK pathway cause cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Science. 2006;311(5765):1287–90. Epub 2006/01/28. doi: 10.1126/science.1124642. PubMed PMID: 16439621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Allanson JE, Anneren G, Aoki Y, Armour CM, Bondeson ML, Cave H, Gripp KW, Kerr B, Nystrom AM, Sol-Church K, Verloes A, Zenker M. Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome: does genotype predict phenotype? Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C(2):129–35. Epub 2011/04/16. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30295. PubMed PMID: 21495173; PMCID: PMC3086095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Gripp KW, Lin AE, Nicholson L, Allen W, Cramer A, Jones KL, Kutz W, Peck D, Rebolledo MA, Wheeler PG, Wilson W, Al-Rahawan MM, Stabley DL, Sol-Church K. Further delineation of the phenotype resulting from BRAF or MEK1 germline mutations helps differentiate cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome from Costello syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(13):1472–80. Epub 2007/06/07. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31815. PubMed PMID: 17551924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Nanda S, Rajpal M, Reddy BS. Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome: report of a case with a review of the literature. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43(6):447–50. Epub 2004/06/10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02102.x. PubMed PMID: 15186229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Demir E, Mancano G, Pomponi MG, Ozcelik A, Gucuyener K, Neri G. Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome: phenotypic variability and differential diagnosis in 3 cases with de novo BRAF mutations. Neuropediatrics. 2010;41(3):127–31. Epub 2010/09/23. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262840. PubMed PMID: 20859831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Goodwin AF, Oberoi S, Landan M, Charles C, Groth J, Martinez A, Fairley C, Weiss LA, Tidyman WE, Klein OD, Rauen KA. Craniofacial and dental development in cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome: the importance of Ras signaling homeostasis. Clin Genet. 2013;83(6):539–44. Epub 2012/09/06. doi: 10.1111/cge.12005. PubMed PMID: 22946697; PMCID: PMC4115672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Chen J, Che L, Xu C, Zhao S, Yang J, Li M, Li G, Shen Y. Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome-associated pathogenic MAP2K1 variants activate autophagy. Gene. 2020;733:144369. Epub 2020/01/24. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144369. PubMed PMID: 31972311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Brems H, Chmara M, Sahbatou M, Denayer E, Taniguchi K, Kato R, Somers R, Messiaen L, De Schepper S, Fryns JP, Cools J, Marynen P, Thomas G, Yoshimura A, Legius E. Germline loss-of-function mutations in SPRED1 cause a neurofibromatosis 1-like phenotype. Nat Genet. 2007;39(9):1120–6. Epub 2007/08/21. doi: 10.1038/ng2113. PubMed PMID: 17704776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Pasmant E, Sabbagh A, Hanna N, Masliah-Planchon J, Jolly E, Goussard P, Ballerini P, Cartault F, Barbarot S, Landman-Parker J, Soufir N, Parfait B, Vidaud M, Wolkenstein P, Vidaud D, France RN. SPRED1 germline mutations caused a neurofibromatosis type 1 overlapping phenotype. J Med Genet. 2009;46(7):425–30. Epub 2009/04/16. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.065243. PubMed PMID: 19366998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Legius E, Stevenson D. Legius Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA)1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Denayer E, Descheemaeker MJ, Stewart DR, Keymolen K, Plasschaert E, Ruppert SL, Snow J, Thurm AE, Joseph LA, Fryns JP, Legius E. Observations on intelligence and behavior in 15 patients with Legius syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C(2):123–8. Epub 2011/04/16. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30297. PubMed PMID: 21495177; PMCID: PMC3081633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Brems H, Legius E. Legius syndrome, an Update. Molecular pathology of mutations in SPRED1. Keio J Med. 2013;62(4):107–12. Epub 2013/12/18. doi: 10.2302/kjm.2013-0002-re. PubMed PMID: 24334617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Denayer E, Chmara M, Brems H, Kievit AM, van Bever Y, Van den Ouweland AM, Van Minkelen R, de Goede-Bolder A, Oostenbrink R, Lakeman P, Beert E, Ishizaki T, Mori T, Keymolen K, Van den Ende J, Mangold E, Peltonen S, Brice G, Rankin J, Van Spaendonck-Zwarts KY, Yoshimura A, Legius E. Legius syndrome in fourteen families. Hum Mutat. 2011;32(1):E1985–98. Epub 2010/11/23. doi: 10.1002/humu.21404. PubMed PMID: 21089071; PMCID: PMC3038325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Messiaen L, Yao S, Brems H, Callens T, Sathienkijkanchai A, Denayer E, Spencer E, Arn P, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Bay C, Bobele G, Cohen BH, Escobar L, Eunpu D, Grebe T, Greenstein R, Hachen R, Irons M, Kronn D, Lemire E, Leppig K, Lim C, McDonald M, Narayanan V, Pearn A, Pedersen R, Powell B, Shapiro LR, Skidmore D, Tegay D, Thiese H, Zackai EH, Vijzelaar R, Taniguchi K, Ayada T, Okamoto F, Yoshimura A, Parret A, Korf B, Legius E. Clinical and mutational spectrum of neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome. JAMA. 2009;302(19):2111–8. Epub 2009/11/19. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1663. PubMed PMID: 19920235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Brems H, Pasmant E, Van Minkelen R, Wimmer K, Upadhyaya M, Legius E, Messiaen L. Review and update of SPRED1 mutations causing Legius syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(11):1538–46. Epub 2012/07/04. doi: 10.1002/humu.22152. PubMed PMID: 22753041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Yu X, Chen S, Potter OL, Murthy SM, Li J, Pulcini JM, Ohashi N, Winata T, Everett ET, Ingram D, Clapp WD, Hock JM. Neurofibromin and its inactivation of Ras are prerequisites for osteoblast functioning. Bone. 2005;36(5):793–802. Epub 2005/04/05. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.01.022. PubMed PMID: 15804420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Kolanczyk M, Kossler N, Kuhnisch J, Lavitas L, Stricker S, Wilkening U, Manjubala I, Fratzl P, Sporle R, Herrmann BG, Parada LF, Kornak U, Mundlos S. Multiple roles for neurofibromin in skeletal development and growth. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16(8):874–86. Epub 2007/02/24. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm032. PubMed PMID: 17317783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.El Khassawna T, Toben D, Kolanczyk M, Schmidt-Bleek K, Koennecke I, Schell H, Mundlos S, Duda GN. Deterioration of fracture healing in the mouse model of NF1 long bone dysplasia. Bone. 2012;51(4):651–60. Epub 2012/08/08. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.07.011. PubMed PMID: 22868293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Kossler N, Stricker S, Rodelsperger C, Robinson PN, Kim J, Dietrich C, Osswald M, Kuhnisch J, Stevenson DA, Braun T, Mundlos S, Kolanczyk M. Neurofibromin (Nf1) is required for skeletal muscle development. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(14):2697–709. Epub 2011/04/12. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr149. PubMed PMID: 21478499; PMCID: PMC3118757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.de la Croix Ndong J, Makowski AJ, Uppuganti S, Vignaux G, Ono K, Perrien DS, Joubert S, Baglio SR, Granchi D, Stevenson DA, Rios JJ, Nyman JS, Elefteriou F. Asfotase-alpha improves bone growth, mineralization and strength in mouse models of neurofibromatosis type-1. Nat Med. 2014;20(8):904–10. Epub 2014/07/07. doi: 10.1038/nm.3583. PubMed PMID: 24997609; PMCID: PMC4126855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Zhang W, Rhodes SD, Zhao L, He Y, Zhang Y, Shen Y, Yang D, Wu X, Li X, Yang X, Park SJ, Chen S, Turner C, Yang FC. Primary osteopathy of vertebrae in a neurofibromatosis type 1 murine model. Bone. 2011;48(6):1378–87. Epub 2011/03/29. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.03.760. PubMed PMID: 21439418; PMCID: PMC3584682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Elefteriou F, Benson MD, Sowa H, Starbuck M, Liu X, Ron D, Parada LF, Karsenty G. ATF4 mediation of NF1 functions in osteoblast reveals a nutritional basis for congenital skeletal dysplasiae. Cell Metab. 2006;4(6):441–51. Epub 2006/12/05. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.10.010. PubMed PMID: 17141628; PMCID: PMC2756713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Kamiya N, Yamaguchi R, Aruwajoye O, Kim AJ, Kuroyanagi G, Phipps M, Adapala NS, Feng JQ, Kim HK. Targeted Disruption of NF1 in Osteocytes Increases FGF23 and Osteoid With Osteomalacialike Bone Phenotype. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(8):1716–26. Epub 2017/04/21. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3155. PubMed PMID: 28425622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Araki T, Mohi MG, Ismat FA, Bronson RT, Williams IR, Kutok JL, Yang W, Pao LI, Gilliland DG, Epstein JA, Neel BG. Mouse model of Noonan syndrome reveals cell type- and gene dosage-dependent effects of Ptpn11 mutation. Nat Med. 2004;10(8):849–57. Epub 2004/07/27. doi: 10.1038/nm1084. PubMed PMID: 15273746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.De Rocca Serra-Nedelec A, Edouard T, Treguer K, Tajan M, Araki T, Dance M, Mus M, Montagner A, Tauber M, Salles JP, Valet P, Neel BG, Raynal P, Yart A. Noonan syndrome-causing SHP2 mutants inhibit insulin-like growth factor 1 release via growth hormone-induced ERK hyperactivation, which contributes to short stature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(11):4257–62. Epub 2012/03/01. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119803109. PubMed PMID: 22371576; PMCID: PMC3306697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Tajan M, Pernin-Grandjean J, Beton N, Gennero I, Capilla F, Neel BG, Araki T, Valet P, Tauber M, Salles JP, Yart A, Edouard T. Noonan syndrome-causing SHP2 mutants impair ERK-dependent chondrocyte differentiation during endochondral bone growth. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(13):2276–89. Epub 2018/04/17. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy133. PubMed PMID: 29659837; PMCID: PMC6005060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Nakamura T, Gulick J, Pratt R, Robbins J. Noonan syndrome is associated with enhanced pERK activity, the repression of which can prevent craniofacial malformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(36):15436–41. Epub 2009/08/27. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903302106. PubMed PMID: 19706403; PMCID: PMC2741269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Hernandez-Porras I, Fabbiano S, Schuhmacher AJ, Aicher A, Canamero M, Camara JA, Cusso L, Desco M, Heeschen C, Mulero F, Bustelo XR, Guerra C, Barbacid M. K-RasV14I recapitulates Noonan syndrome in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(46):16395–400. Epub 2014/11/02. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418126111. PubMed PMID: 25359213; PMCID: PMC4246321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Wong JC, Perez-Mancera PA, Huang TQ, Kim J, Grego-Bessa J, Del Pilar Alzamora M, Kogan SC, Sharir A, Keefe SH, Morales CE, Schanze D, Castel P, Hirose K, Huang GN, Zenker M, Sheppard D, Klein OD, Tuveson DA, Braun BS, Shannon K. KrasP34R and KrasT58I mutations induce distinct RASopathy phenotypes in mice. JCI Insight. 2020;5(21). Epub 2020/09/30. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.140495. PubMed PMID: 32990679; PMCID: PMC7710308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Jopling C, van Geemen D, den Hertog J. Shp2 knockdown and Noonan/LEOPARD mutant Shp2-induced gastrulation defects. PLoS Genet. 2007;3(12):e225. Epub 2007/12/28. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030225. PubMed PMID: 18159945; PMCID: PMC2151089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Runtuwene V, van Eekelen M, Overvoorde J, Rehmann H, Yntema HG, Nillesen WM, van Haeringen A, van der Burgt I, Burgering B, den Hertog J. Noonan syndrome gain-of-function mutations in NRAS cause zebrafish gastrulation defects. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4(3):393–9. Epub 2011/01/26. doi: 10.1242/dmm.007112. PubMed PMID: 21263000; PMCID: PMC3097460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Stewart RA, Sanda T, Widlund HR, Zhu S, Swanson KD, Hurley AD, Bentires-Alj M, Fisher DE, Kontaridis MI, Look AT, Neel BG. Phosphatase-dependent and -independent functions of Shp2 in neural crest cells underlie LEOPARD syndrome pathogenesis. Dev Cell. 2010;18(5):750–62. Epub 2010/05/25. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.03.009. PubMed PMID: 20493809; PMCID: PMC3035154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Chen X, Mitsutake N, LaPerle K, Akeno N, Zanzonico P, Longo VA, Mitsutake S, Kimura ET, Geiger H, Santos E, Wendel HG, Franco A, Knauf JA, Fagin JA. Endogenous expression of Hras(G12V) induces developmental defects and neoplasms with copy number imbalances of the oncogene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(19):7979–84. Epub 2009/05/07. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900343106. PubMed PMID: 19416908; PMCID: PMC2674938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Schuhmacher AJ, Guerra C, Sauzeau V, Canamero M, Bustelo XR, Barbacid M. A mouse model for Costello syndrome reveals an Ang II-mediated hypertensive condition. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(6):2169–79. Epub 2008/05/17. doi: 10.1172/JCI34385. PubMed PMID: 18483625; PMCID: PMC2381749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Goodwin AF, Tidyman WE, Jheon AH, Sharir A, Zheng X, Charles C, Fagin JA, McMahon M, Diekwisch TG, Ganss B, Rauen KA, Klein OD. Abnormal Ras signaling in Costello syndrome (CS) negatively regulates enamel formation. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(3):682–92. Epub 2013/09/24. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt455. PubMed PMID: 24057668; PMCID: PMC3888259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Andreadi C, Cheung LK, Giblett S, Patel B, Jin H, Mercer K, Kamata T, Lee P, Williams A, McMahon M, Marais R, Pritchard C. The intermediate-activity (L597V)BRAF mutant acts as an epistatic modifier of oncogenic RAS by enhancing signaling through the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. Genes Dev. 2012;26(17):1945–58. Epub 2012/08/16. doi: 10.1101/gad.193458.112. PubMed PMID: 22892241; PMCID: PMC3435497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Urosevic J, Sauzeau V, Soto-Montenegro ML, Reig S, Desco M, Wright EM, Canamero M, Mulero F, Ortega S, Bustelo XR, Barbacid M. Constitutive activation of B-Raf in the mouse germ line provides a model for human cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(12):5015–20. Epub 2011/03/09. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016933108. PubMed PMID: 21383153; PMCID: PMC3064394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Inoue S, Moriya M, Watanabe Y, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Niihori T, Oba D, Ono M, Kure S, Ogura T, Matsubara Y, Aoki Y. New BRAF knockin mice provide a pathogenetic mechanism of developmental defects and a therapeutic approach in cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(24):6553–66. Epub 2014/07/19. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu376. PubMed PMID: 25035421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Moriya M, Inoue S, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Nakashima Y, Oba D, Niihori T, Hashi M, Ohnishi H, Kure S, Matsubara Y, Aoki Y. Adult mice expressing a Braf Q241R mutation on an ICR/CD-1 background exhibit a cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome phenotype. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(25):7349–60. Epub 2015/10/17. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv435. PubMed PMID: 26472072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Inoue SI, Morozumi N, Yoshikiyo K, Maeda H, Aoki Y. C-type natriuretic peptide improves growth retardation in a mouse model of cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(1):74–83. Epub 2018/09/22. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy333. PubMed PMID: 30239744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Kim JM, Yang YS, Park KH, Oh H, Greenblatt MB, Shim JH. The ERK MAPK Pathway Is Essential for Skeletal Development and Homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(8). Epub 2019/04/25. doi: 10.3390/ijms20081803. PubMed PMID: 31013682; PMCID: PMC6514701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Fowlkes JL, Bunn RC, Ray PD, Kalaitzoglou E, Uppuganti S, Unal M, Nyman JS, Thrailkill KM. Constitutive activation of MEK1 in osteoprogenitors increases strength of bone despite impairing mineralization. Bone. 2020;130:115106. Epub 2019/11/07. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115106. PubMed PMID: 31689526; PMCID: PMC6914252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Aoidi R, Houde N, Landry-Truchon K, Holter M, Jacquet K, Charron L, Krishnaswami SR, Yu BD, Rauen KA, Bisson N, Newbern J, Charron J. Mek1(Y130C) mice recapitulate aspects of human cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2018;11(3). Epub 2018/03/29. doi: 10.1242/dmm.031278. PubMed PMID: 29590634; PMCID: PMC5897723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Umutesi HG, Hoang HM, Johnson HE, Nam K, Heo J. Development of Noonan syndrome by deregulation of allosteric SOS autoactivation. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(39):13651–63. Epub 2020/08/06. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013275. PubMed PMID: 32753483; PMCID: PMC7521655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Bunda S, Heir P, Srikumar T, Cook JD, Burrell K, Kano Y, Lee JE, Zadeh G, Raught B, Ohh M. Src promotes GTPase activity of Ras via tyrosine 32 phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(36):E3785–94. Epub 2014/08/27. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406559111. PubMed PMID: 25157176; PMCID: PMC4246987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Kano Y, Gebregiworgis T, Marshall CB, Radulovich N, Poon BPK, St-Germain J, Cook JD, Valencia-Sama I, Grant BMM, Herrera SG, Miao J, Raught B, Irwin MS, Lee JE, Yeh JJ, Zhang ZY, Tsao MS, Ikura M, Ohh M. Tyrosyl phosphorylation of KRAS stalls GTPase cycle via alteration of switch I and II conformation. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):224. Epub 2019/01/16. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08115-8. PubMed PMID: 30644389; PMCID: PMC6333830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Motta M, Fidan M, Bellacchio E, Pantaleoni F, Schneider-Heieck K, Coppola S, Borck G, Salviati L, Zenker M, Cirstea IC, Tartaglia M. Dominant Noonan syndrome-causing LZTR1 mutations specifically affect the Kelch domain substrate-recognition surface and enhance RAS-MAPK signaling. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(6):1007–22. Epub 2018/11/28. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy412. PubMed PMID: 30481304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Umeki I, Niihori T, Abe T, Kanno SI, Okamoto N, Mizuno S, Kurosawa K, Nagasaki K, Yoshida M, Ohashi H, Inoue SI, Matsubara Y, Fujiwara I, Kure S, Aoki Y. Delineation of LZTR1 mutation-positive patients with Noonan syndrome and identification of LZTR1 binding to RAF1-PPP1CB complexes. Hum Genet. 2019;138(1):21–35. Epub 2018/10/29. doi: 10.1007/s00439-018-1951-7. PubMed PMID: 30368668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Gripp KW, Aldinger KA, Bennett JT, Baker L, Tusi J, Powell-Hamilton N, Stabley D, Sol-Church K, Timms AE, Dobyns WB. A novel rasopathy caused by recurrent de novo missense mutations in PPP1CB closely resembles Noonan syndrome with loose anagen hair. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170(9):2237–47. Epub 2016/06/07. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37781. PubMed PMID: 27264673; PMCID: PMC5134331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Dumaz N, Marais R. Protein kinase A blocks Raf-1 activity by stimulating 14-3-3 binding and blocking Raf-1 interaction with Ras. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(32):29819–23. Epub 2003/06/13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300182200. PubMed PMID: 12801936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Molzan M, Ottmann C. Synergistic binding of the phosphorylated S233- and S259-binding sites of C-RAF to one 14-3-3zeta dimer. J Mol Biol. 2012;423(4):486–95. Epub 2012/08/28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.08.009. PubMed PMID: 22922483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Molzan M, Schumacher B, Ottmann C, Baljuls A, Polzien L, Weyand M, Thiel P, Rose R, Rose M, Kuhenne P, Kaiser M, Rapp UR, Kuhlmann J, Ottmann C. Impaired binding of 14-3-3 to C-RAF in Noonan syndrome suggests new approaches in diseases with increased Ras signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(19):4698–711. Epub 2010/08/04. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01636-09. PubMed PMID: 20679480; PMCID: PMC2950525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Popov IK, Hiatt SM, Whalen S, Keren B, Ruivenkamp C, van Haeringen A, Chen MJ, Cooper GM, Korf BR, Chang C. A YWHAZ Variant Associated With Cardiofaciocutaneous Syndrome Activates the RAF-ERK Pathway. Front Physiol. 2019;10:388. Epub 2019/04/27. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00388. PubMed PMID: 31024343; PMCID: PMC6465419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Lavoie H, Therrien M. Regulation of RAF protein kinases in ERK signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16(5):281–98. Epub 2015/04/25. doi: 10.1038/nrm3979. PubMed PMID: 25907612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Rajakulendran T, Sahmi M, Lefrancois M, Sicheri F, Therrien M. A dimerization-dependent mechanism drives RAF catalytic activation. Nature. 2009;461(7263):542–5. Epub 2009/09/04. doi: 10.1038/nature08314. PubMed PMID: 19727074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Anastasaki C, Estep AL, Marais R, Rauen KA, Patton EE. Kinase-activating and kinase-impaired cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome alleles have activity during zebrafish development and are sensitive to small molecule inhibitors. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(14):2543–54. Epub 2009/04/21. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp186. PubMed PMID: 19376813; PMCID: PMC2701326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Hall BE, Yang SS, Boriack-Sjodin PA, Kuriyan J, Bar-Sagi D. Structure-based mutagenesis reveals distinct functions for Ras switch 1 and switch 2 in Sos-catalyzed guanine nucleotide exchange. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(29):27629–37. Epub 2001/05/03. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101727200. PubMed PMID: 11333268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Franceschi RT, Ge C. Control of the Osteoblast Lineage by Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling. Curr Mol Biol Rep. 2017;3(2):122–32. Epub 2017/10/24. doi: 10.1007/s40610-017-0059-5. PubMed PMID: 29057206; PMCID: PMC5647885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Kozhemyakina E, Lassar AB, Zelzer E. A pathway to bone: signaling molecules and transcription factors involved in chondrocyte development and maturation. Development. 2015;142(5):817–31. Epub 2015/02/26. doi: 10.1242/dev.105536. PubMed PMID: 25715393; PMCID: PMC4352987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Lee K, Seo I, Choi MH, Jeong D. Roles of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Osteoclast Biology. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10). Epub 2018/10/03. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103004. PubMed PMID: 30275408; PMCID: PMC6213329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Wakioka T, Sasaki A, Kato R, Shouda T, Matsumoto A, Miyoshi K, Tsuneoka M, Komiya S, Baron R, Yoshimura A. Spred is a Sprouty-related suppressor of Ras signalling. Nature. 2001;412(6847):647–51. Epub 2001/08/09. doi: 10.1038/35088082. PubMed PMID: 11493923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Stowe IB, Mercado EL, Stowe TR, Bell EL, Oses-Prieto JA, Hernandez H, Burlingame AL, McCormick F. A shared molecular mechanism underlies the human rasopathies Legius syndrome and Neurofibromatosis-1. Genes Dev. 2012;26(13):1421–6. Epub 2012/07/04. doi: 10.1101/gad.190876.112. PubMed PMID: 22751498; PMCID: PMC3403010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Hirata Y, Brems H, Suzuki M, Kanamori M, Okada M, Morita R, Llano-Rivas I, Ose T, Messiaen L, Legius E, Yoshimura A. Interaction between a Domain of the Negative Regulator of the Ras-ERK Pathway, SPRED1 Protein, and the GTPase-activating Protein-related Domain of Neurofibromin Is Implicated in Legius Syndrome and Neurofibromatosis Type 1. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(7):3124–34. Epub 2015/12/05. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.703710. PubMed PMID: 26635368; PMCID: PMC4751360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Papaioannou G, Mirzamohammadi F, Kobayashi T. Ras signaling regulates osteoprogenitor cell proliferation and bone formation. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(10):e2405. Epub 2016/10/14. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.314. PubMed PMID: 27735946; PMCID: PMC5133981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Nakamura T, Toita H, Yoshimoto A, Nishimura D, Takagi T, Ogawa T, Takeya T, Ishida-Kitagawa N. Potential involvement of Twist2 and Erk in the regulation of osteoblastogenesis by HB-EGF-EGFR signaling. Cell Struct Funct. 2010;35(1):53–61. Epub 2010/05/08. doi: 10.1247/csf.10001. PubMed PMID: 20448405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Nakayama K, Tamura Y, Suzawa M, Harada S, Fukumoto S, Kato M, Miyazono K, Rodan GA, Takeuchi Y, Fujita T. Receptor tyrosine kinases inhibit bone morphogenetic protein-Smad responsive promoter activity and differentiation of murine MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(5):827–35. Epub 2003/05/08. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.5.827. PubMed PMID: 12733721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Peng S, Zhou G, Luk KD, Cheung KM, Li Z, Lam WM, Zhou Z, Lu WW. Strontium promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2009;23(1-3):165–74. Epub 2009/03/04. doi: 10.1159/000204105. PubMed PMID: 19255511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Watanabe-Takano H, Takano K, Keduka E, Endo T. M-Ras is activated by bone morphogenetic protein-2 and participates in osteoblastic determination, differentiation, and transdifferentiation. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(3):477–90. Epub 2009/10/06. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.09.028. PubMed PMID: 19800879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Jiang W, Takeshita N, Maeda T, Sogi C, Oyanagi T, Kimura S, Yoshida M, Sasaki K, Ito A, Takano-Yamamoto T. Connective tissue growth factor promotes chemotaxis of preosteoblasts through integrin alpha5 and Ras during tensile force-induced intramembranous osteogenesis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2368. Epub 2021/01/29. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82246-9. PubMed PMID: 33504916; PMCID: PMC7841149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Kanno T, Takahashi T, Tsujisawa T, Ariyoshi W, Nishihara T. Mechanical stress-mediated Runx2 activation is dependent on Ras/ERK1/2 MAPK signaling in osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101(5):1266–77. Epub 2007/02/01. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21249. PubMed PMID: 17265428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP. Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4(8):638–49. Epub 2003/08/05. doi: 10.1038/nrg1122. PubMed PMID: 12897775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Kim JH, Kim N. Signaling Pathways in Osteoclast Differentiation. Chonnam Med J. 2016;52(1):12–7. Epub 2016/02/13. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2016.52.1.12. PubMed PMID: 26865996; PMCID: PMC4742606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Bradley EW, Ruan MM, Vrable A, Oursler MJ. Pathway crosstalk between Ras/Raf and PI3K in promotion of M-CSF-induced MEK/ERK-mediated osteoclast survival. J Cell Biochem. 2008;104(4):1439–51. Epub 2008/02/16. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21719. PubMed PMID: 18275061; PMCID: PMC3530847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Rubin J, Murphy TC, Rahnert J, Song H, Nanes MS, Greenfield EM, Jo H, Fan X. Mechanical inhibition of RANKL expression is regulated by H-Ras-GTPase. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(3):1412–8. Epub 2005/11/25. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508639200. PubMed PMID: 16306046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Xie Z, Khair M, Shaukat I, Netter P, Mainard D, Barre L, Ouzzine M. Non-canonical Wnt induces chondrocyte de-differentiation through Frizzled 6 and DVL-2/B-raf/CaMKIIalpha/syndecan 4 axis. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(8):1442–56. Epub 2018/01/21. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0050-y. PubMed PMID: 29352270; PMCID: PMC6113213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Choi JY, Han KM, Kim D, Lee BH, Yoo HW, Choi JH, Han YM. Impaired Osteogenesis of Disease-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from a CFC Syndrome Patient. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(12). Epub 2017/12/02. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122591. PubMed PMID: 29194391; PMCID: PMC5751194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Provot S, Nachtrab G, Paruch J, Chen AP, Silva A, Kronenberg HM. A-raf and B-raf are dispensable for normal endochondral bone development, and parathyroid hormone-related peptide suppresses extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in hypertrophic chondrocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(1):344–57. Epub 2007/10/31. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00617-07. PubMed PMID: 17967876; PMCID: PMC2223319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Papaioannou G, Petit ET, Liu ES, Baccarini M, Pritchard C, Demay MB. Raf Kinases Are Essential for Phosphate Induction of ERK1/2 Phosphorylation in Hypertrophic Chondrocytes and Normal Endochondral Bone Development. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(8):3164–71. Epub 2017/01/12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.763342. PubMed PMID: 28073913; PMCID: PMC5336153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Liu ES, Raimann A, Chae BT, Martins JS, Baccarini M, Demay MB. c-Raf promotes angiogenesis during normal growth plate maturation. Development. 2016;143(2):348–55. Epub 2015/12/15. doi: 10.1242/dev.127142. PubMed PMID: 26657770; PMCID: PMC4725343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Hutchison MR. BDNF alters ERK/p38 MAPK activity ratios to promote differentiation in growth plate chondrocytes. Mol Endocrinol. 2012;26(8):1406–16. Epub 2012/06/16. doi: 10.1210/me.2012-1063. PubMed PMID: 22700586; PMCID: PMC3404299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Zhang Q, Matsui H, Horiuchi H, Liang X, Sasaki K. A-Raf and C-Raf differentially regulate mechanobiological response of osteoblasts to guide mechanical stress-induced differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;476(4):438–44. Epub 2016/06/01. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.05.141. PubMed PMID: 27240957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Fujita T, Meguro T, Fukuyama R, Nakamuta H, Koida M. New signaling pathway for parathyroid hormone and cyclic AMP action on extracellular-regulated kinase and cell proliferation in bone cells. Checkpoint of modulation by cyclic AMP. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(25):22191–200. Epub 2002/04/17. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110364200. PubMed PMID: 11956184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Beier F, Taylor AC, LuValle P. The Raf-1/MEK/ERK pathway regulates the expression of the p21(Cip1/Waf1) gene in chondrocytes. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(42):30273–9. Epub 1999/10/09. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.42.30273. PubMed PMID: 10514521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Wang L, Iorio C, Yan K, Yang H, Takeshita S, Kang S, Neel BG, Yang W. A ERK/RSK-mediated negative feedback loop regulates M-CSF-evoked PI3K/AKT activation in macrophages. FASEB J. 2018;32(2):875–87. Epub 2017/10/20. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700672RR. PubMed PMID: 29046360; PMCID: PMC5888401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Wang L, Yang H, Huang J, Pei S, Wang L, Feng JQ, Jing D, Zhao H, Kronenberg HM, Moore DC, Yang W. Targeted Ptpn11 deletion in mice reveals the essential role of SHP2 in osteoblast differentiation and skeletal homeostasis. Bone Res. 2021;9(1):6. Epub 2021/01/28. doi: 10.1038/s41413-020-00129-7. PubMed PMID: 33500396; PMCID: PMC7838289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Kim HK, Feng GS, Chen D, King PD, Kamiya N. Targeted disruption of Shp2 in chondrocytes leads to metachondromatosis with multiple cartilaginous protrusions. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(3):761–9. Epub 2013/08/10. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2062. PubMed PMID: 23929766; PMCID: PMC4081537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Bowen ME, Ayturk UM, Kurek KC, Yang W, Warman ML. SHP2 regulates chondrocyte terminal differentiation, growth plate architecture and skeletal cell fates. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(5):e1004364. Epub 2014/05/31. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004364. PubMed PMID: 24875294; PMCID: PMC4038465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Kuorilehto T, Nissinen M, Koivunen J, Benson MD, Peltonen J. NF1 tumor suppressor protein and mRNA in skeletal tissues of developing and adult normal mouse and NF1-deficient embryos. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(6):983–9. Epub 2004/05/06. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040130. PubMed PMID: 15125795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Wu X, Estwick SA, Chen S, Yu M, Ming W, Nebesio TD, Li Y, Yuan J, Kapur R, Ingram D, Yoder MC, Yang FC. Neurofibromin plays a critical role in modulating osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(19):2837–45. Epub 2006/08/09. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl208. PubMed PMID: 16893911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Sharma R, Wu X, Rhodes SD, Chen S, He Y, Yuan J, Li J, Yang X, Li X, Jiang L, Kim ET, Stevenson DA, Viskochil D, Xu M, Yang FC. Hyperactive Ras/MAPK signaling is critical for tibial nonunion fracture in neurofibromin-deficient mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(23):4818–28. Epub 2013/07/19. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt333. PubMed PMID: 23863460; PMCID: PMC3820137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Sullivan K, El-Hoss J, Little DG, Schindeler A. JNK inhibitors increase osteogenesis in Nf1-deficient cells. Bone. 2011;49(6):1311–6. Epub 2011/10/04. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.09.043. PubMed PMID: 21964323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Karolak MR, Yang X, Elefteriou F. FGFR1 signaling in hypertrophic chondrocytes is attenuated by the Ras-GAP neurofibromin during endochondral bone formation. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(9):2552–64. Epub 2015/01/27. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv019. PubMed PMID: 25616962; PMCID: PMC4383864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Wang W, Nyman JS, Ono K, Stevenson DA, Yang X, Elefteriou F. Mice lacking Nf1 in osteochondroprogenitor cells display skeletal dysplasia similar to patients with neurofibromatosis type I. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(20):3910–24. Epub 2011/07/16. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr310. PubMed PMID: 21757497; PMCID: PMC3177652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Ono K, Karolak MR, Ndong Jde L, Wang W, Yang X, Elefteriou F. The ras-GTPase activity of neurofibromin restrains ERK-dependent FGFR signaling during endochondral bone formation. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(15):3048–62. Epub 2013/04/11. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt162. PubMed PMID: 23571107; PMCID: PMC3999379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Murakami S, Balmes G, McKinney S, Zhang Z, Givol D, de Crombrugghe B. Constitutive activation of MEK1 in chondrocytes causes Stat1-independent achondroplasia-like dwarfism and rescues the Fgfr3-deficient mouse phenotype. Genes Dev. 2004;18(3):290–305. Epub 2004/02/12. doi: 10.1101/gad.1179104. PubMed PMID: 14871928; PMCID: PMC338282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Rhodes SD, Yang FC. Aberrant Myeloid Differentiation Contributes to the Development of Osteoporosis in Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2016;14(1):10–5. Epub 2016/03/05. doi: 10.1007/s11914-016-0298-z. PubMed PMID: 26932441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Rhodes SD, Yang H, Dong R, Menon K, He Y, Li Z, Chen S, Staser KW, Jiang L, Wu X, Yang X, Peng X, Mohammad KS, Guise TA, Xu M, Yang FC. Nf1 Haploinsufficiency Alters Myeloid Lineage Commitment and Function, Leading to Deranged Skeletal Homeostasis. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(10):1840–51. Epub 2015/04/29. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2538. PubMed PMID: 25917016; PMCID: PMC5441523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Heerva E, Alanne MH, Peltonen S, Kuorilehto T, Hentunen T, Vaananen K, Peltonen J. Osteoclasts in neurofibromatosis type 1 display enhanced resorption capacity, aberrant morphology, and resistance to serum deprivation. Bone. 2010;47(3):583–90. Epub 2010/06/15. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.06.001. PubMed PMID: 20541045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Yang FC, Chen S, Robling AG, Yu X, Nebesio TD, Yan J, Morgan T, Li X, Yuan J, Hock J, Ingram DA, Clapp DW. Hyperactivation of p21ras and PI3K cooperate to alter murine and human neurofibromatosis type 1-haploinsufficient osteoclast functions. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(11):2880–91. Epub 2006/10/21. doi: 10.1172/JCI29092. PubMed PMID: 17053831; PMCID: PMC1616197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Stevenson DA, Yan J, He Y, Li H, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Jing Y, Guo Z, Zhang W, Yang D, Wu X, Hanson H, Li X, Staser K, Viskochil DH, Carey JC, Chen S, Miller L, Roberson K, Moyer-Mileur L, Yu M, Schwarz EL, Pasquali M, Yang FC. Multiple increased osteoclast functions in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(5):1050–9. Epub 2011/04/06. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33965. PubMed PMID: 21465658; PMCID: PMC3080465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Pennanen P, Kallionpaa RA, Peltonen S, Nissinen L, Kahari VM, Heerva E, Peltonen J. Signaling pathways in human osteoclasts differentiation: ERK1/2 as a key player. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(2):1243–54. Epub 2021/01/25. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-06128-5. PubMed PMID: 33486672; PMCID: PMC7925492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Razzouk S, Lieberherr M, Cournot G. Rac-GTPase, osteoclast cytoskeleton and bone resorption. Eur J Cell Biol. 1999;78(4):249–55. Epub 1999/06/01. doi: 10.1016/S0171-9335(99)80058-2. PubMed PMID: 10350213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Fukuda A, Hikita A, Wakeyama H, Akiyama T, Oda H, Nakamura K, Tanaka S. Regulation of osteoclast apoptosis and motility by small GTPase binding protein Rac1. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(12):2245–53. Epub 2005/11/19. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050816. PubMed PMID: 16294277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Rhodes SD, Wu X, He Y, Chen S, Yang H, Staser KW, Wang J, Zhang P, Jiang C, Yokota H, Dong R, Peng X, Yang X, Murthy S, Azhar M, Mohammad KS, Xu M, Guise TA, Yang FC. Hyperactive transforming growth factor-beta1 signaling potentiates skeletal defects in a neurofibromatosis type 1 mouse model. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(12):2476–89. Epub 2013/05/25. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1992. PubMed PMID: 23703870; PMCID: PMC6774615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Li H, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Jing Y, Chen S, Song Z, Yan J, Li Y, Wu X, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Case J, Yu M, Ingram DA, Yang FC. Ras dependent paracrine secretion of osteopontin by Nf1+/− osteoblasts promote osteoclast activation in a neurofibromatosis type I murine model. Pediatr Res. 2009;65(6):613–8. Epub 2009/02/28. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181a1c607. PubMed PMID: 19247213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Ge C, Xiao G, Jiang D, Franceschi RT. Critical role of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase-MAPK pathway in osteoblast differentiation and skeletal development. J Cell Biol. 2007;176(5):709–18. Epub 2007/02/28. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200610046. PubMed PMID: 17325210; PMCID: PMC2064027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Xiao G, Gopalakrishnan R, Jiang D, Reith E, Benson MD, Franceschi RT. Bone morphogenetic proteins, extracellular matrix, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways are required for osteoblast-specific gene expression and differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(1):101–10. Epub 2002/01/05. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.1.101. PubMed PMID: 11771655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Xiao G, Jiang D, Thomas P, Benson MD, Guan K, Karsenty G, Franceschi RT. MAPK pathways activate and phosphorylate the osteoblast-specific transcription factor, Cbfa1. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(6):4453–9. Epub 2000/02/08. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.6.4453. PubMed PMID: 10660618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Franceschi RT, Xiao G, Jiang D, Gopalakrishnan R, Yang S, Reith E. Multiple signaling pathways converge on the Cbfa1/Runx2 transcription factor to regulate osteoblast differentiation. Connect Tissue Res. 2003;44 Suppl 1:109–16. Epub 2003/09/04. PubMed PMID: 12952183; PMCID: PMC3564252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Higuchi C, Myoui A, Hashimoto N, Kuriyama K, Yoshioka K, Yoshikawa H, Itoh K. Continuous inhibition of MAPK signaling promotes the early osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization of the extracellular matrix. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(10):1785–94. Epub 2002/10/09. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.10.1785. PubMed PMID: 12369782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Ross FP. M-CSF, c-Fms, and signaling in osteoclasts and their precursors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1068:110–6. Epub 2006/07/13. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.014. PubMed PMID: 16831911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Wada T, Nakashima T, Hiroshi N, Penninger JM. RANKL-RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease. Trends Mol Med. 2006;12(1):17–25. Epub 2005/12/17. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2005.11.007. PubMed PMID: 16356770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Swaminathan G, Tsygankov AY. The Cbl family proteins: ring leaders in regulation of cell signaling. J Cell Physiol. 2006;209(1):21–43. Epub 2006/06/03. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20694. PubMed PMID: 16741904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Chiusaroli R, Sanjay A, Henriksen K, Engsig MT, Horne WC, Gu H, Baron R. Deletion of the gene encoding c-Cbl alters the ability of osteoclasts to migrate, delaying resorption and ossification of cartilage during the development of long bones. Dev Biol. 2003;261(2):537–47. Epub 2003/09/23. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00299-9. PubMed PMID: 14499658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Severe N, Dieudonne FX, Marie PJ. E3 ubiquitin ligase-mediated regulation of bone formation and tumorigenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e463. Epub 2013/01/19. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.217. PubMed PMID: 23328670; PMCID: PMC3564004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Scanlon V, Walia B, Yu J, Hansen M, Drissi H, Maye P, Sanjay A. Loss of Cbl-PI3K interaction modulates the periosteal response to fracture by enhancing osteogenic commitment and differentiation. Bone. 2017;95:124–35. Epub 2016/11/26. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.11.020. PubMed PMID: 27884787; PMCID: PMC5819877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Harindhanavudhi T, Takahashi T, Petryk A, Polly DW. An Adjunctive Use of Asfotase Alfa and Zoledronic Acid after Spinal Surgery in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Related Dystrophic Scoliosis. AACE Clin Case Rep. 2020;6(6):e305–e10. Epub 2020/11/28. doi: 10.4158/ACCR-2020-0222. PubMed PMID: 33244490; PMCID: PMC7685405 Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which funded the study. D.W.P. serves as a consultant for SI Bone and as a speaker for Globus. He also received royalties from a textbook published by Springer. His institution received research support from Medtronic and MizuhoOS, as well as royalties from Globus and Medtronic. The other authors have no multiplicity of interest to disclose. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.de la Croix Ndong J, Stevens DM, Vignaux G, Uppuganti S, Perrien DS, Yang X, Nyman JS, Harth E, Elefteriou F. Combined MEK inhibition and BMP2 treatment promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone healing in Nf1Osx −/− mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(1):55–63. Epub 2014/07/22. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2316. PubMed PMID: 25043591; PMCID: PMC4280331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



