Table 5.

The macro- and micro-nutrients concentration of thyme in different treatments.

Treatments	N content (g/kg)		P content (g/kg)		K content (g/kg)		Ca content (g/kg)		Mg content (g/kg)		Fe content (mg/kg)		Zn content (mg/kg)
	2018	2019	2018	2019	2018	2019	2018	2019	2018	2019	2018	2019	2018	2019
Cropping pattern
Sole culture	17.1 b	18.7 c	1.95 a	2.1 a	13 b	14.6 b	4.2 ab	5.1 b	2.4 b	2.9 b	310.1 b	401.5 c	18.04 a	21.2 b
50:50	19.6 a	22.5 a	2.05 a	2.3 a	15.2 a	17.1 a	4.4 a	5.3 a	2.5 ab	3.3 a	377.8 a	503.8 a	18.96 a	23.3 a
66:34	18.6 a	21.1 b	1.96 a	2.2 a	15.1 a	16.7 a	4.1 b	5.2 ab	2.6 a	3.4 a	329.7 b	448.2 b	18.27 a	20.8 b
Fertilization
Control	17.5 b	19.8 b	1.6 b	1.9 b	13.5 b	15.1 b	3.98 b	5.04 b	2.3 b	2.98 b	311.1 b	420.5 b	17.87 b	20.9 b
AMF	19.4 a	21.7 a	2.1 a	2.5 a	15.4 a	17.1 a	4.43 a	5.33 a	2.8 a	3.40 a	367.3 a	481.8 a	18.99 a	22.6 a
Drought stress
I20	22.25 a	24.7 a	2.35 a	2.82 a	18.02 a	19.9 a	4.8 a	5.8 a	3.04 a	3.66 a	408.2 a	532.8 a	20.9 a	25.1 a
I50	18.1 b	20.2 b	1.96 b	2.3 b	14.1b	15.7 b	4.2 b	5.1 b	2.51 b	3.16 b	318.2 b	436.7 b	18.5 b	21.5 b
I80	15.04 c	17.4 c	1.65 c	1.99 c	11.29 c	12.8 c	3.7 c	4.7c	2.05 c	2.75 c	291.2 b	384.1 c	15.9 c	18.7 c
Significance
C	**	**	ns	ns	**	**	*	*	*	**	**	**	ns	**
F	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	*	**
D	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**
C × F	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
C × D	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	*	*
D × F	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
C × D × F	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns

Ts, 50:50 and 66:34 indicating thyme sole culture and intercropping ratio of thyme with soybean; I₂₀, I₅₀ and I₈₀ indicating non-stressed, moderate and severe water deficit levels.

ns, * and ** indicated no significant difference, significant at 5% probability level and significant at 1% probability level, respectively.