Table 1.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | M | SD | Min | Max | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fronto parietal regions T1 | – | −0.000 | 0.895 | −2.709 | 2.189 | ||||||||||
Fronto parietal regions T2 | .340* | – | −0.623 | 0.742 | −3.132 | 2.308 | |||||||||
Fronto parietal regions T3 | .261* | .222* | – | −0.808 | 0.769 | −3.041 | 1.424 | ||||||||
Fronto parietal regions T4 | .443* | .394* | .312* | – | −0.888 | 0.652 | −2.580 | 1.308 | |||||||
rACC T1 | −0.036 | −0.065 | .011 | −0.184* | – | −0.507 | 0.424 | −1.676 | 0.812 | ||||||
rACC T2 | −0.139 | −0.006 | −0.135 | −0.092 | .251* | – | −0.430 | 0.343 | −1.262 | 0.632 | |||||
rACC T3 | −0.066 | −0.195* | −0.176 | −0.241* | .055 | .186 | – | −0.262 | 0.361 | −1.427 | 0.695 | ||||
rACC T4 | −0.054 | −0.015 | .024 | −0.151 | .048 | 0.208* | 0.281* | – | −0.314 | 0.351 | −1.426 | 0.463 | |||
Behavioral CC T1 | .153 | .172* | .109 | .180* | −0.176* | −0.039 | −0.082 | −0.106 | – | 0.240 | 0.040 | 0.150 | 0.347 | ||
Behavioral CC T2 | .115 | .086 | .076 | .167* | −0.224* | −0.082 | −0.108 | −0.177 | .491* | – | 0.206 | 0.041 | 0.112 | 0.301 | |
Behavioral CC T3 | .036 | .090 | .162 | .107 | −0.157 | −0.052 | −0.061 | −0.079 | .451* | .587* | – | 0.192 | 0.042 | 0.105 | 0.377 |
Behavioral CC T4 | .005 | .184* | .006 | .137 | −0.242* | .014 | −0.062 | −0.165 | .391* | .595* | .506* | 0.181 | 0.044 | 0.095 | 0.315 |
Note. rACC = the rostral anterior cingulate cortex; CC = Cognitive Control; T1 = Time 1; T2 = Time 2; T3 = Time 3; T4 = Time 4. Although we used the latent factors of fronto-parietal regions, manifest variable factor scores were used for descriptive purposes.
p < .05.