Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 27;13(7):645–654. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.645

Table 4.

Summary of studies reporting post-endoscopic full-thickness resection defect closure by the use of endoscopic suturing systems

Ref. Study design Lesions, n Mean tumor size (range), cm Site (cardia/antrum/ body/fundus) R0 Surgical conversion Suture technique Suture technical success Mean operation time (range), min Mean suture time (range), min Major adverse events
Andalib et al[35], 2018 CS 7 - - - 0 ESS 7 - - 0
Xu et al[36], 2018 CR 1 2.4 0/0/0/1 1 0 ESS 1 - - 0
Granata et al[37], 2018 CR 1 - 0/0/1/0 - 0 ESS (3 running sutures) 1 - - 0
Dedania et al[38], 2018 CR 1 1.5 0/0/1/0 . 0 ESS (2 running sutures) 1 - - 0
Inayat et al[40], 2019 CS 3 2.35 (1.85-3.20) 2/0/0/1 - 0 Clips omental-patch + ESS 3 - - 0
Kerdsirichairat et al[41], 2019 CR 1 - 1/0/0/0 1 0 Clips omental-patch + ESS 1 - - 0
Sachdev et al[42], 2020 CS 2 3.15 (2.8-3.5) 2/0/0/0 - 0 Clips omental-patch + ESS 2 - - 0
Modayil et al[39], 2020 CR 1 2.5 0/0/0/1 1 0 ESS (1 running suture) 1 - - 0

CS: Case series; ESS: Endoscopic suturing system; CR: Case report.