Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 13;23(7):e26658. doi: 10.2196/26658

Table 5.

Mean rating of exercise form by the physiotherapists, using a 6-point Likert scale, and interrater agreement comparisons between app–physiotherapist and physiotherapist 1–physiotherapist 2 percent agreement values for each exercise.

Exercisea Rating, mean (SD) Percent agreement P value


App–physiotherapist 1 App–physiotherapist 2 Physiotherapist 1–physiotherapist 2 App–agreement Comparison 1b Comparison 2c
a 2.8 (1.1) 0.804 (0.735-0.861) 0.845 (0.782-0.896) 0.851 (0.788-0.896) 0.881 (0.816-0.929) .32 .23
b 3.4 (1.3) 0.792 (0.680-0.878) 0.806 (0.695-0.889) 0.875 (0.776-0.889) 0.841 (0.727-0.921) .86 .13
c 4.3 (1.4) 0.778 (0.664-0.867) 0.750 (0.634-0.845) 0.750 (0.634-0.845) 0.852 (0.729-0.934) .67 .67
d 4.5 (1.1) 0.889 (0.793-0.951) 0.889 (0.793-0.951) 0.889 (0.793-0.951) 0.938 (0.840-0.983) >.999 >.999
e 4.5 (1.2) 0.833 (0.727-0.911) 0.861 (0.759-0.931) 0.778 (0.664-0.931) 0.946 (0.851-0.989) .48 .36
f 4.8 (1.0) 0.812 (0.720-0.885) 0.875 (0.792-0.934) 0.833 (0.744-0.934) 0.912 (0.828-0.964) .12 .68

aLetters correspond to those in Figure 1.

bApp–physiotherapist 1 vs physiotherapist 1–physiotherapist 2.

cApp–physiotherapist 2 vs physiotherapist 1–physiotherapist 2.