TABLE 1.
Effect of various concentrations of five treatments on tobacco mildew disease.
| Isolate | Concentration (CFU/mL) | Disease index | Disease rate (%) | Control efficacy (%) |
| Control | NA | 19.64 ± 0.09a | 43.12 ± 0.77a | NA |
| Y2 | 106 | 0.04 ± 0.04b | 0.43 ± 0.43b | 99.80 ± 0.20d |
| 105 | 0.25 ± 0.07bc | 2.75 ± 0.77c | 98.74 ± 0.35bcd | |
| Pb | 106 | 0.10 ± 0.06b | 1.16 ± 0.72bc | 99.47 ± 0.33cd |
| 105 | 0.26 ± 0.12bc | 2.90 ± 1.31c | 98.67 ± 0.60bcd | |
| YN28 | 106 | 0.11 ± 0.04b | 1.21 ± 0.40bc | 99.45 ± 0.18cd |
| 105 | 0.24 ± 0.06bc | 2.67 ± 0.67b | 98.78 ± 0.31bcd | |
| YN32 | 106 | 0.14 ± 0.06b | 1.61 ± 0.64bc | 99.27 ± 0.29bcd |
| 105 | 0.29 ± 0.09bc | 3.18 ± 0.96c | 98.55 ± 0.44bc | |
| Th-B | 108 | 0.36 ± 0.06bc | 4.06 ± 0.70c | 98.15 ± 0.32b |
| 107 | 0.67 ± 0.09c | 7.45 ± 0.97cd | 96.59 ± 0.44a |
Data are mean ± SD. Different letters after significant difference at p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s test.