Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 14;12:683365. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.683365

TABLE 2.

Effect of different application methods on tobacco mildew.

Application method Isolate Disease index Disease rate (%) Control efficacy (%)
Spray Control 21.24 ± 0.23a 61.33 ± 0.91a NA
Y2 0.48 ± 0.16b 4.28 ± 1.45b 97.76 ± 0.76e
Pb 1.08 ± 0.04b 9.69 ± 0.35bc 94.93 ± 0.18cd
Th-B 1.78 ± 0.26bc 16.01 ± 2.31c 91.62 ± 1.21a
Soak Control 21.18 ± 0.11a 59.22 ± 0.52a NA
Y2 0.54 ± 0.11b 4.88 ± 1.02b 97.45 ± 0.53e
Pb 0.89 ± 0.05b 8.02 ± 0.44b 95.81 ± 0.23de
Th-B 1.79 ± 0.13bc 16.14 ± 1.19c 91.56 ± 0.62a
Y2/Pb 1.67 ± 0.22bc 15.07 ± 1.94c 92.12 ± 1.02ab
Th-B/Pb 1.46 ± 0.12b 13.16 ± 1.06bc 93.12 ± 0.56abc
Y2/Th-B 1.22 ± 0.05b 11.02 ± 0.46bc 94.24 ± 0.24bcd

Data are mean ± SD. Different letters after significant difference at p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s test.