Table 4.
CO2 Hydration KI (nM)a |
CO2 Hydration KI (nM)a |
CO2 Hydration KI (nM)a |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cpd | NgCA | hCA I | hCA II | Cpd | NgCA | hCA I | hCA II | Cpd | NgCA | hCA I | hCA II |
AZM | 74.1 ± 3.2 | 250 ± 11 | 12.5 ± 0.8 | 12 | 14.1 ± 0.8 | 76.5 ± 3.6 | 26.2 ± 1.4 | 24 | 45.2 ± 3.0 | 64.7 ± 4.5 | 58.1 ± 2.2 |
1 | 73.2 ± 3.9 | 8,600b ± 300 | 60b ± 3 | 13 | 9.8 ± 0.4 | 63.3 ± 3.7 | 20.2 ± 1.5 | 25 | 61.4 ± 4.9 | 53.4 ± 2.8 | 20.9 ± 1.6 |
2 | 59.8 ± 2.1 | 235 ± 14 | 37.2 ± 1.9 | 14 | 75.8 ± 5.0 | 117 ± 9.4 | 47.7 ± 3.2 | 26 | 29.9 ± 1.4 | 14c ± 0.9 | 0.9c ± 0.04 |
3 | 41.0 ± 3.0 | 180 ± 6 | 30.9 ± 1.3 | 15 | 8.7 ± 0.7 | 152 ± 13 | 26 ± 1.8 | 27 | 63.6 ± 2.4 | 9.6c ± 0.8 | 1.6c ± 0.1 |
4 | 30.5 ± 1.1 | 167 ± 6.9 | 9.5 ± 0.8 | 16 | 78.6 ± 5.2 | 109 ± 7 | 29.0 ± 1.5 | 28 | 73.9 ± 3.0 | 701 ± 34 | 47.2 ± 4.1 |
5 | 27.5 ± 1.8 | 213 ± 14 | 22.3 ± 1.9 | 17 | 29.3 ± 2.1 | 372 ± 19 | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 29 | 42.1 ± 2.9 | 1,135 ± 98 | 78.4 ± 4.7 |
6 | 87.9 ± 5.0 | 215 ± 17 | 55.6 ± 3.7 | 18 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 77.8 ± 6.9 | 4.9 ±0.3 | 30 | 62.0 ± 3.9 | 1,623 ± 126 | 104 ± 9.1 |
7 | 17.7 ± 0.9 | 367 ± 14 | 23.6 ± 1.4 | 19 | 34.6 ± 2.5 | 86.3 ± 5.9 | 19.4 ± 1.1 | 31 | >10,000 | n.d. | n.d. |
8 | 9.1 ± 0.6 | 231 ± 15 | 7.3 ± 0.60 | 20 | 36.6 ± 2.0 | 58.7 ± 4.1 | 24.5 ± 1.7 | 32 | 632 ± 41 | 465 ± 11 | 97.2 ± 11 |
9 | 8.5 ± 0.4 | 328 ± 14 | 22.7 ± 1.8 | 21 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 190 ± 18 | 10.2 ± 0.7 | 33 | 439 ± 41 | 1,331 ± 11 | 67.7 ± 11 |
10 | 15.2 ± 0.6 | 157 ± 13 | 24.6 ± 1.3 | 22 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 945 ± 37 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | ||||
11 | 42.3 ± 1.6 | 125 ± 11 | 41.5 ± 2.0 | 23 | 8.3 ± 0.4 | 855 ± 76 | 8.1 ± 0.70 |
AZM = acetazolamide;
Catalytic CO2 hydration assay Ki determined from the mean of one experiment performed in triplicate and IC50 values entered into Cheng-Prusoff equation. Values reported are ± standard error of the mean.
Previously reported by Di Cesare Mannelli et al.81
Previously reported by Turkmen et al.80