Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 27;21:533. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04011-0

Table 2.

Comparison of the main study variables between the misoprostol and FC groups

Variable Misoprostol group (N = 60) FC group (N = 60) Total P-value OR 95% CI
NVD N (%) 44 (73.3) 51 (85.0) 95 (79.2) 0.116a 0.49 0.19–1.21
C-section N (%) 16 (26.7) 9 (15.0) 25 (20.8) 0.116a 2.06 0.83–5.12
Placental abruption N (%) 9 (15.0) 1 (1.7) 10 (8.3) 0.008a 10.41 1.28–85.00
Uterine tachysystole N (%) 13 (21.7) 0 (0.0) 13 (10.8)  < 0.001a 2.28 1.84–2.82
Meconium-stained AF N (%) 10 (16.7) 7 (11.7) 17 (14.2) 0.432a 1.51 0.54–4.29
Oxytocin requirement N (%) 25 (41.7) 44 (73.3) 69 (57.5)  < 0.001a 0.26 0.12–0.56
NICU admission N (%) 3 (5.0) 2 (3.3) 5 (4.2) 1.000b 1.53 0.25–9.48
Labor duration (minutes) mean ± SD 1425.67 ± 69.98 2023.92 ± 201.57 0.001c

Abbreviations: N number, SD standard deviation, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NVD normal vaginal delivery, C-section Cesarean section, AF amniotic fluid, NICU neonatal intensive care unit

aAnalyzed by Chi-squared test

bAnalyzed by Fisher’s exact test

cAnalyzed by Student’s t-test