Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 28;21:298. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02327-0

Table 1.

Construct validity of the de Morton Mobility Index (n = 348) including the hypotheses on construct validity and the constructs of the comparison measurement instruments

No Hypothesis Comparison measurement instrument Observed correlation with DEMMI (Spearman’s correlation) Hypothesis confirmed
Measurement instrument Construct Mean ± SD (range) or median (IQR) rho 95% CI
1 A correlation of > 0.7 was expected between the DEMMI and other measures of mobility and functional independence POMA, 0–28 points Mobility 18 ± 10 (0–28) 0.94 0.93 to 0.95 Yes
2 Timed Up and Go test (n = 266), seca Mobility 14 ± 11 (4–76) 0.80 0.75 to 0.84 Yes
3 10-m gait speed, fast (n = 277), m/sec Mobility 1.15 ± 0.51 (0.11–2.00) 0.75 0.69 to 0.80 Yes
4 FIM mobility sub-scale (n = 325), 5–35 points Mobility 23 ± 8 (5–35) 0.80 0.76 to 0.84 Yes
5 FAC, 0–5 points Ambulation 4 (3–5) 0.89 0.87 to 0.91 Yes
6 6-min walk test (n = 276), meters Walking endurance 349 ± 161 (28–664) 0.82 0.78 to 0.86 Yes
7 Berg Balance Scale, 0–56 points Balance 36 ± 19 (0–56) 0.95 0.94 to 0.96 Yes
8 FIM total (n = 325), 18–126 points Functional independence 86 ± 24 (18–126) 0.73 0.68 to 0.78 Yes

SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile-range, CI confidence interval, DEMMI de Morton Mobility Index, POMA Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, FIM Functional Independence Measure, FAC Functional Ambulation Categories

a indicates hypothesis of a negative correlation