Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 27;21:403. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02841-2

Table 5.

Personal abilities and schools’ teaching areas that could be affected by the Guanghua Cup

Item referees (%) team leaders (%) participating students (%) volunteers (%) p value
Personal abilities Professional knowledge* 10 (31.25 %) 20 (66.67 %) 122 (73.50 %) 52 (47.28 %) 0.000
Clinical skills* 8 (25.00 %) 18 (60.00 %) 139 (83.73 %) 30 (27.27 %) 0.000
Self-recognition* 6 (18.75 %) 10 (33.33 %) 89 (53.61 %) 22 (21.00 %) 0.000
Professional interest* 6 (18.75 %) 9 (30.00 %) 80 (48.19 %) 38 (34.55 %) 0.004
Cooperation* 18 (56.25 %) 28 (93.33 %) 148 (89.16 %) 98 (89.09 %) 0.000
Communication* 14 (43.75 %) 23 (76.67 %) 124 (74.70 %) 84 (76.36 %) 0.004
Teaching methods 26 (81.25 %) 23 (76.67 %) 121 (72.89 %) 83 (75.45 %) 0.812
Crisis management* 6 (18.75 %) 15 (50.00 %) 74 (44.58 %) 30 (27.27 %) 0.001
Others* 2 (6.25 %) 0 (0.00 %) 1 (0.60 %) 0 (0.00 %) 0.046
Schools’ teaching Improving the standardization of preclinical and clinical teaching* 26 (81.25 %) 28 (93.33 %) 157 (94.58 %) 73 (66.36 %) 0.000
Updating teaching methods* 20 (62.50 %) 19 (63.33 %) 78 (46.99 %) 37 (33.64 %) 0.003
Strengthening competitive consciousness 16 (50.00 %) 16 (53.33 %) 89 (53.61 %) 54 (49.09 %) 0.895
Promoting communication and cooperation* 30 (93.75 %) 28 (93.33 %) 116 (69.88 %) 88 (80.00 %) 0.001
Enriching experience in holding competitions* 12 (37.50 %) 20 (66.67 %) 64 (38.55 %) 38 (34.55 %) 0.017
Encouraging education reform* 18 (56.25 %) 18 (60.00 %) 78 (46.99 %) 30 (27.27 %) 0.000
Others* 2 (6.25 %) 0 (0.00 %) 0 (0.00 %) 0 (0.00 %) 0.029

*Represent statistically significant difference among four interview groups. *(p < 0.05)