Table 5.
Student questionnaire (final version) with Cronbach’s alpha if deleted
| CAID of the subscale | CAID of the questionnaire | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Educational Program (EP) | |||
| 1 | The contents taught to me are relevant to the intended learning outcomes of the curriculum (e.g., doctor as a professional, leader, communicator, researcher, etc.) | .68 | .80 |
| 2 | The curricular content taught in my institution contributes to making students good doctors. | .67 | .80 |
| 3 | In my institution, the content taught to me in one course/module helps me to understand the related concepts in other courses/modules. | .67 | .80 |
| 4 | I am assessed according to intended learning outcomes of the course. | .82 | .83 |
| 5 | My institution uses multiple assessment tools for the assessment of students. | .74 | .80 |
| Cronbach alpha of the subscale | .76 | ||
| 2-Student requirements (SR) | |||
| 6 | My institution offers appropriate Information Communications Technology facilities (e.g., the Internet, computers, software, etc.) for students. | .63 | .81 |
| 7 | My institution has an appropriate infrastructure that supports educational activities such as lectures, PBL sessions, skill acquisition, etc. | .60 | .81 |
| 8 | My institution has adequate support services such as counseling, scholarships, etc. for students. | .61 | .81 |
| 9 | In my institution, a student’s evaluation of the assessments/examinations is considered important for making changes in them. | .61 | .81 |
| 10 | In my institution, students are encouraged to ask questions during teaching sessions. | .68 | .82 |
| Cronbach alpha of the subscale | .68 | ||
| 3-Institutional Culture (IC) | |||
| 11 | Students are fined if they do not adhere to institution policies. | .42 | .83 |
| 12 | Student attendance is strictly monitored through biometric thumb impression in my institution. | .40 | .83 |
| 13 | My institution provides opportunities for social interaction between students and teachers. | .36 | .81 |
| 14 | My institution provides interactive online discussion groups | .36 | .82 |
| Cronbach alpha of the subscale | .46 | ||
| Overall internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) of the questionnaire | .83 | ||