Table 5.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis results to identify variables predictive of mitral restenosis

Variables	Univariate OR (95% CI)	Univariate p value	Multivariate OR (95% CI)	Multivariate p Value
Age	1.013 (0.98–1.04)	0.39
Male Sex	0.972 (0.40–2.30)	0.94
NYHA functional class > 2	1.144 (0.48–2.69)	0.75
AF Rhythm	2.008 (0.88–4.53)	0.09	1.977 (0.819–4.774)	0.15
Antibiotic (Penicillin) Prophylaxis	0.732 (0.35–1.50)	0.39
EF	1.018 (0.936–1.108)	0.67
Left atrial diameter	1.118 (0.62–1.98)	0.70
TMPG	1.036 (0.98–1.09)	0.17
MVA	1.09 (0.54–2.21)	0.78
MR ≥ grade 1	1.306 (0.63–2.68)	0.46
Wilkins score > 8	1.845 (0.86–3.93)	0.10	1.886 (0.833–4.268)	0.12
sPAP	0.272 (0.04–1.61)	0.15
ITMPG	1.159 (0.931–1.444)	0.18
IMVA ≥ 2cm2	0.231 (0.109–0.491)	< 0.001	0.240 (0.105–0.548)	0.001
IMR: grade 2	2.14 (0.86–5.35)	0.10	1.097 (0.388- 3.101)	0.86

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NYHA New York Heart Association, AF atrial fibrillation, EF ejection fraction, TMPG mean Trans-mitral pressure gradient, MVA mitral valve area, MR mitral regurgitation, sPAP systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, IMVA immediate post-PTMC mitral valve area, IMR immediate post-PTMC mitral regurgitation, ITMPG immediate post-PTMC mean trans-mitral pressure gradient