Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 28;21:380. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01716-8

Table 4.

Statistical significance was found in pairwise comparisons

1 2 3 6–12 13–16 17–25 26–33
OPA a v b a v c a v d a v b a v c a v d a v c a v d b v c 1 v 2 1 v 3 1 v 2 1 v 3 1 v 2 1 v 3
MS 1 v 2
LS
MIC
LIC b v c 1 v 3
SS a v d
AS a v c a v d 1 v 3
PS a v b 1 v 3 2 v 3
AIC a v c a v d a v c a v d a v c a v d
PIC
HF a v c 1 v 2
WF
AEI 1 v 2 1 v 3
LAC a v b a v c a v d a v b a v c a v d a v c a v d
MAC a v c a v d 1 v 2 2 v 3

1: IGA < 45°; 2: 45° ≤ IGA ≤ 60°; 3: IGA > 60°

a: 6–12 years old group; b: 13–16 years old group; c: 17–25 years old group; d: 26–33 years old group

OPA occlusal plane angle, MS medial space, LS lateral space, MIC medial inclination of the condyle, LIC lateral inclination of the condyle, SS superior space, AS anterior space, PS posterior space, AIC anterior inclination of the condyle, PIC posterior inclination of the condyle, HF height of the fossa, WF width of the fossa, AEI articular eminence inclination, LAC long axis of the condyle, MAC minor axis of the condyle