Table 3.
The indirect effect of emotional intelligence on academic performance through flourishing conditioned by teacher-student relationship quality.
| Predictors | On flourishing | On academic performance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | t | p | B | SE | t | p | |
| Constant | 42.889 | 4.331 | 9.902 | <0.001 | 10.054 | 1.558 | 6.452 | <0.001 |
| Gender (cov) | 1.507 | 0.661 | 2.279 | 0.023 | 0.193 | 0.203 | 0.952 | 0.341 |
| Age (cov) | −0.064 | 0.297 | −0.216 | 0.828 | −0.453 | 0.090 | −5.024 | <0.001 |
| Emotional intelligence | 3.608 | 0.315 | 11.428 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.116 | 0.052 | 0.958 |
| Teacher-student relationship | 3.689 | 0.653 | 5.649 | <0.001 | ||||
| EI × TSR | −1.688 | 0.512 | −3.294 | 0.001 | ||||
| Flourishing | 0.042 | 0.017 | 2.385 | 0.017 | ||||
| R2 | 0.499 | 0.133 | ||||||
| F | 52.125 | <0.001 | 10.066 | <0.001 | ||||
| Conditional indirect effect of EI on AP through flourishing at levels of TSR | ||||||||
| Boot Indirect effect | Boot SE | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | |||||
| M − SD | 0.192 | 0.082 | 0.042 | 0.359 | ||||
| M + SD | 0.112 | 0.059 | 0.022 | 0.257 | ||||
| Index of moderated mediation | Boot SE | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | |||||
| −0.071 | 0.037 | −0.152 | −0.009 | |||||
N = 267; B, unstandardized coefficient; SE, standard error; cov, covariate; EI, emotional intelligence; TSR, teacher-student relationship. Gender was dummy coded (1 = male, 2 = female). LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval.