Table 3.
OLS Regression of Loneliness on Social Relationship Variables, N = 3,567
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation (ref: heterosexual with no same-sex experience) | ||||||
| LGB | 0.35** | 0.22* | 0.25** | 0.29** | 0.33** | 0.12 |
| (0.11) | (0.11) | (0.11) | (0.10) | (0.11) | (0.10) | |
| Heterosexual with same-sex experience | 0.12* | 0.10 | 0.11* | 0.09 | 0.12* | 0.08 |
| (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.05) | (0.06) | (0.05) | |
| Age | −0.01** | −0.01*** | −0.00 | 0.00 | −0.00* | −0.00 |
| (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | |
| Female | 0.13*** | 0.06 | 0.18*** | 0.22*** | 0.15*** | 0.15*** |
| (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | |
| Education (ref: less than high school) | ||||||
| High school or equivalent | −0.04 | −0.03 | −0.05 | −0.03 | −0.02 | −0.04 |
| (0.07) | (0.07) | (0.06) | (0.07) | (0.07) | (0.06) | |
| Some college/associate degree | −0.02 | −0.00 | −0.02 | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.06) | |
| Bachelor’s degree and more | −0.08 | −0.04 | −0.06 | −0.03 | −0.02 | 0.02 |
| (0.07) | (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.07) | (0.06) | |
| Race/ethnicity (ref: white) | ||||||
| Black | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.01 | −0.03 | 0.11* | −0.11* |
| (0.05) | (0.05) | (0.05) | (0.05) | (0.05) | (0.05) | |
| Hispanic | −0.05 | −0.06 | −0.11 | −0.19** | −0.06 | −0.18** |
| (0.07) | (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.07) | (0.06) | |
| Other | −0.09 | −0.08 | −0.16* | −0.21** | −0.09 | −0.20** |
| (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | |
| Marital status (ref: married/cohabiting) | ||||||
| Divorced/separated/widowed | 0.43*** | 0.42*** | ||||
| (0.04) | (0.04) | |||||
| Never married | 0.41*** | 0.36*** | ||||
| (0.08) | (0.08) | |||||
| Number of close family (ref: 0) | ||||||
| 1 | 0.14 | 0.12 | ||||
| (0.12) | (0.11) | |||||
| 2–3 | 0.16 | 0.16 | ||||
| (0.11) | (0.10) | |||||
| 4–9 | 0.08 | 0.13 | ||||
| (0.11) | (0.10) | |||||
| 10+ | 0.05 | 0.15 | ||||
| (0.11) | (0.11) | |||||
| Family support | −0.19*** | −0.16*** | ||||
| (0.02) | (0.02) | |||||
| Family strain | 0.27*** | 0.22*** | ||||
| (0.02) | (0.02) | |||||
| Number of friends (ref: 0) | ||||||
| 1 | −0.09 | −0.09 | ||||
| (0.16) | (0.15) | |||||
| 2–3 | −0.18 | −0.17 | ||||
| (0.13) | (0.13) | |||||
| 4–9 | −0.22 | −0.18 | ||||
| (0.13) | (0.13) | |||||
| 10+ | −0.38** | −0.29* | ||||
| (0.13) | (0.13) | |||||
| Friend support | −0.13*** | −0.07** | ||||
| (0.02) | (0.02) | |||||
| Friend strain | 0.26*** | 0.14*** | ||||
| (0.02) | (0.02) | |||||
| Community participation | −0.08*** | −0.02 | ||||
| (0.02) | (0.02) | |||||
| Constant | 0.24 | 0.35 ** | 0.59 ** | −0.21 | −0.14 | −0.08 |
| (0.13) | (0.13) | (0.19) | (0.12) | (0.13) | (0.19) |
Note: Partnership quality and neighborhood quality are not included in the table because additional analysis suggested that they provided little explanation for the observed loneliness gap.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.