Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;25:29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.01.007

Table 2.

Summary of the studies included in the review

Study Study design Gender Outcomes NOS
AAs (%)
ARM severity
ARM surgery Questionnaire Age (yr) Sample (n) Control group
S C O T UG SP High Int. Low
Trovalusci 2020, Italy [16] CSS, MC Male ED, EJD 2 0 1 3 NR NR Yes Yes Yes PSARP, LAARP IIEF 26 (18–41) 25 No
Bjørsum-Meyer 2020, Denmark [17] CSS, SC Both SD, ED, BR 1 0 2 3 34.6 50.0 Yes Yes Yes PSARP 10 Perineal 9 Dilatation 4 APPT 2 Cutback 1 FSFI, IIEF 24 (18–32) 26 No
Eleuteri 2019, Italy [18] CSS, SC Male ED, EJD 1 0 1 2 NR NR NR NR NR NR AIMAR 28.8 ± 10.6 12 No
Witvliet 2018, The Netherlands [19] CSS, MC Both SD, ED 3 0 2 5 21.6 NR Yes No Yes PSARP, anoplasty, ASARP, Rehbein, PSARVUP, others FSFI, IIEF >18 37 No
Kyrklund 2016, Finland [20] CSS, SC Both LUTS 2 0 1 3 NR 33.3 No Yes Yes PSARP/ ASARP DPSS >12 39 No
Kyrklund 2016, Finland [21] CSS, SC Male ED, EJD 2 0 1 3 12.2 19.5 Yes Yes Yes PSARP 20 ASARP 10 Cutback/dilatation 11 Erection Hardness Score 21 (16–29) 41 Yes
Hondel 2015, The Netherlands [22] CSS, MC Both SD, ED 3 0 2 5 29 NR Yes Yes Yes APPT, PSARP, perineal, others FSFI, IIEF >18 63 No
Borg 2013, Sweden [23] PS, SC Both LUTS 3 0 3 6 NR NR Yes Yes Yes PSARP Designed 10 24 No
Schmidt 2012, Germany [24] CSS, MC Both EJD, BR 1 0 1 2 NR NR Yes Yes Yes NR NS 19–35 55 No
Schmidt 2012, Germany [25] CSS, MC Male NBD 1 0 1 2 NR NR Yes Yes Yes NR Interview 18–56 32 No
Grano 2011, Italy [26] PS, SC Both UI 1 0 1 2 NR 16.7 Yes Yes Yes NR HAQL 17–49 36 No
Davies 2010, USA [27] CSS, SC Both UI, SD, ED, EJD, BR 3 0 0 3 NR 43.8 Yes Yes Yes NR ICS-male 25.6 (18–46) 74 No
Iwai 2007, Japan [28] CSS, SC Both ED, EJD, BR 1 0 1 2 10.3 3.6 Yes Yes Yes APPT/ perineoplasty NR 26.3 (20–40) 29 No
Konuma 2006, Japan [29] CSS, SC Male ED, EJD, NBD, BR 1 0 1 2 17.7 35.3 Yes Yes No APPT, SP, ASP Interview 24 (20–29) 17 No
Rintala 1999, Finland [30] CSS, SC Male UI 1 0 2 3 NR 44.4 Yes No No ASP, PSARP NR 10–22 36 No
Hassink 1993, The Netherlands [31] CSS, SC Both UI 1 1 0 2 45.0 48.0 Yes No No APPT, ASP, perineal NR 26.0 (18.1–56.9) 58 No
Rintala 1992, Finland [32] CSS, SC Both UI, BR 2 0 1 3 NR NR No No Yes Dilatations, cutback, pull-through Unspecified questionnaire 35.2 ± 4.1 83 Yes

CSS = cross-sectional study; PS = prospective study; MC = multicentre; SC = single-centre; ED = erectile dysfunction; EJD = ejaculatory dysfunction; SD = sexual dysfunction; BR = birth rate; LUTS = lower urinary tract symptoms; NBD = neurogenic bladder dysfunction; UI = urinary incontinence; NOS = Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (S = selection; C = comparability; O = outcome; T = total score); AAs = associated anomalies (UG = urogenital; SP = spinal); NR = not reported; ARM = anorectal malformation; PSARP = posterior sagittal anorectoplasty; LAARP = laparoscopic assisted anorectal pull-through; APPT = abdominoperineal pull-through; ASARP = anterior sagittal anorectoplasty; PSARVUP = posterior sagittal anorectal vaginal urethraplasty; SP = sacroperineal dissection; ASP = abdominosacroperineal dissection; IIEF = International Index of Erectile Function; FSFI = Female Sexual Function Index; AIMAR = Italian Association for Anorectal Malformations; DPSS = Danish Prostatic Symptom Score; HAQL = Hirschsprung Disease/Anorectal Malformation Quality of Life Questionnaire; ICS = International Continence Society.