Table 1.
Study [reference]/location | Number randomized | Duration (mo) | Mean age | Mean IPSS | Mean prostate volume (ml) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prostatic arterial embolization versus TURP | |||||
Abt (2018) [10]/Switzerland | 103 | 3 | 66 | 18 | 52 |
Carnevale (2016) [11]/Brazil | 30 | 12 | 65 | 26 | 60 |
Gao (2014) [12]/China | 114 | 24 | 67 | 23 | 64 |
Totals and means | 247 | 66 | 21 | 58 | |
Prostatic urethral lift versus TURP | |||||
Gratzke (2017) [7]/Europe | 91 | 24 | 64 | 22 | 39 |
Prostatic urethral lift versus sham | |||||
Roehrborn (2013) [6]/USA, Canada, Australia | 206 | 3 | 66 | 23 | 43 |
Transurethral prostate convective radiofrequency water vapor (Rezūm system) versus sham | |||||
McVary (2016) [15]/USA | 197 | 3 | 63 | 22 | 45 |
Aquablation versus TURP | |||||
Gilling (2019) [14]/International | 184 | 12 | 66 | 23 | 53 |
IPSS = International Prostate Symptom Score; TURP = transurethral prostate resection.