Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Posit Psychol. 2010 Jan 28;5(1):41–61. doi: 10.1080/17439760903435208

Table 7.

Correlations of eudaimonic well-being, subjective well-being, and psychological well-being with measures of identity commitment and positive and negative psychological functioning (sample 2, N = 5096).

Well-being variables
EWB SWB PWB
Identity Commitment Measures
 EPSI—Stage 5 0.62 0.48 0.46
 III—Subjective Syntonic 0.51 0.35 0.38
 III—Behavioral Syntonic 0.53 0.44 0.35
 III—Subjective Dystonic −0.51 −0.53 −0.42
 III—Behavioral Dystonic −0.41 −0.51 −0.31
 DIDS—Commitment Making 0.50 0.33 0.31
 DIDS—Identification with Commitment 0.51 0.34 0.33
Positive Psychological Functioning
 RSES—Self-Esteem 0.65 0.63 0.54
 LOCS—Internal Locus of Control 0.40 0.20 0.18
Negative Psychological Functioning
 BAI—General Anxiety −0.37 −0.44 −0.34
 SIAS—Social Anxiety −0.44 −0.49 −0.32
 CES-D—Depression −0.42 −0.42 −0.29

Note: Correlations were estimated using standardized regression coefficients.

All correlations significant at p < 0.001.