Table 7.
Correlations of eudaimonic well-being, subjective well-being, and psychological well-being with measures of identity commitment and positive and negative psychological functioning (sample 2, N = 5096).
Well-being variables |
|||
---|---|---|---|
EWB | SWB | PWB | |
Identity Commitment Measures | |||
EPSI—Stage 5 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.46 |
III—Subjective Syntonic | 0.51 | 0.35 | 0.38 |
III—Behavioral Syntonic | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.35 |
III—Subjective Dystonic | −0.51 | −0.53 | −0.42 |
III—Behavioral Dystonic | −0.41 | −0.51 | −0.31 |
DIDS—Commitment Making | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.31 |
DIDS—Identification with Commitment | 0.51 | 0.34 | 0.33 |
Positive Psychological Functioning | |||
RSES—Self-Esteem | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.54 |
LOCS—Internal Locus of Control | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.18 |
Negative Psychological Functioning | |||
BAI—General Anxiety | −0.37 | −0.44 | −0.34 |
SIAS—Social Anxiety | −0.44 | −0.49 | −0.32 |
CES-D—Depression | −0.42 | −0.42 | −0.29 |
Note: Correlations were estimated using standardized regression coefficients.
All correlations significant at p < 0.001.