Table 8.
Unique variability explained by eudaimonic well-being, subjective well-being, and psychological well-being (composite score) for measures of identity commitment and positive and negative psychological functioning (Hypothesis 6—incremental validity) (sample 2, N = 5096).
| Unique variance explained by |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total variance explained | EWB | SWB | PWB | |
| Identity Commitment Related Variables | ||||
| EPSI—Stage 5 | 0.51 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| III—Subjective Syntonic | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| III—Behavioral Syntonic | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| III—Subjective Dystonic | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| III—Behavioral Dystonic | 0.28 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
| DIDS—Commitment Making | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| DIDS—Identification with Commitment | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Positive Psychological Functioning | ||||
| RSES—Self-Esteem | 0.54 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| LOCS—Internal Locus of Control | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Negative Psychological Functioning | ||||
| BAI—General Anxiety | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| SIAS—Social Anxiety | 0.26 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| CES-D—Depression | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 |