Table 4.
Statistical analysis for Figure 6
| Set of data | Type of statistical analysis | Results of statistical analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A, DRD1 protein expression | |||
| All subregions | One-way ANOVA | F(6,28) = 8.234 | p < 0.001 |
| Subregion (1) vs (4) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(28) = 3.06 | p = 0.0290 |
| Subregion (1) vs (5) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(28) = 5.657 | p < 0.001 |
| B, Gαolf protein expression | |||
| All subregions | One-way ANOVA | F(6,46) = 20.39 | p < 0.001 |
| Subregion (1) vs (2-2) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 3.262 | p = 0.0125 |
| Subregion (1) vs (2-3) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 3.622 | p = 0.0044 |
| Subregion (1) vs (3) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 3.951 | p = 0.0016 |
| Subregion (1) vs (5) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 6.357 | p < 0.001 |
| Mediolateral axis | One-way ANOVA | F(2,15) = 6.681 | p = 0.0084 |
| Subregion (2-1) vs (2-2) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(15) = 2.945 | p = 0.0301 |
| Subregion (2-1) vs (2-3) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(15) = 3.348 | p = 0.0132 |
| C, PDE10A protein expression | |||
| All subregions | One-way ANOVA | F(6,46) = 26.71 | p < 0.001 |
| Subregion (1) vs (2-2) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 2.869 | p = 0.0372 |
| Subregion (1) vs (2-3) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 5.701 | p < 0.001 |
| Subregion (1) vs (3) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 4.629 | p < 0.001 |
| Subregion (1) vs (5) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 6.497 | p < 0.001 |
| Mediolateral axis | One-way ANOVA | F(2,15) = 19.8 | p < 0.001 |
| Subregion (2-1) vs (2-2) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(15) = 3.785 | p = 0.0054 |
| Subregion (2-1) vs (2-3) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(15) = 6.247 | p < 0.001 |
| D, ChAT protein expression | |||
| All subregions | One-way ANOVA | F(6,46) = 7.741 | p < 0.001 |
| Subregion (1) vs (3) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 3.566 | p = 0.0052 |
| Subregion (1) vs (5) | Bonferroni post hoc test | t(46) = 3.062 | p = 0.0220 |