Table 7.
Statistical analysis for Figure 9
| Set of data | Type of statistical analysis | Results of statistical analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A, pole test | |||
| Day 1 vs day 15 | t test (Welch's-correction) | t(10.08) = 3.161 | p < 0.05 |
| A, cylinder test | |||
| Day 1 vs day 15 | t test | t(20) = 3.657 | p < 0.01 |
| B, P-Thr34 D32/D32 | |||
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (1) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 16.07 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 7.827 | p = 0.0100 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 6.299 | p = 0.0192 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p < 0.001 | |
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (2-1) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,22) = 18.28 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,22) = 3.859 | p = 0.0619 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,22) = 4.129 | p = 0.0527 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p = 0.0147 | |
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (2-2) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,20) = 33.1 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,20) = 6.996 | p = 0.0155 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,20) = 7.672 | p = 0.0118 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p = 0.0021 | |
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (2-3) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,21) = 20.19 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,21) = 10.39 | p = 0.0041 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,21) = 6.634 | p = 0.0176 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p < 0.001 | |
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (4) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 14.44 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 3.12 | p = 0.0901 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 2.282 | p = 0.1439 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p = 0.0391 | |
| C, P-Ser845 GluA1/GluA1 | |||
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (1) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 16.83 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 3.93 | p = 0.0590 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 6.095 | p = 0.0211 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p = 0.0047 | |
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (2-1) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,22) = 40.51 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,22) = 6.325 | p = 0.0197 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,22) = 8.508 | p = 0.0080 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p = 0.0012 | |
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (2-2) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,20) = 24.45 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,20) = 2.927 | p = 0.1026 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,20) = 6.822 | p = 0.0167 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p = 0.0125 | |
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (2-3) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,21) = 23.25 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,21) = 5.841 | p = 0.0248 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,21) = 8.255 | p = 0.0091 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p = 0.0020 | |
| D, P-Thr202/Tyr204 ERK2/ERK2 | |||
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (1) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 29.83 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 4.401 | p = 0.0558 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,24) = 8.406 | p = 0.0079 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p = 0.0020 | |
| Two-way ANOVA for subregion (2-2) | |||
| SKF effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,20) = 35.53 | p < 0.001 |
| 6-OHDA effect | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,20) = 2.216 | p = 0.1522 |
| SKF-6-OHDA interaction | Two-way ANOVA | F(1,20) = 3.896 | p = 0.0624 |
| SKF: unlesioned side vs lesioned side | Bonferroni post hoc test | p = 0.0474 | |