Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 10;128(1):1–16. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa181

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Variation in yield (t ha–1), calculated from grain weight, of contrasting root hair genotypes grown in the field in sandy loam and clay loam soils for two subsequent years: 2017 (A) and 2018 (B). Data are the mean of four replicates, with error bars representing the s.e. Differences between genotypes and soil textures were established using two-way ANOVA, P-values are reported and significant (P ≤ 0.05) parameters are in bold, with ‘G’ representing genotype, ‘S’ representing soil texture and ‘G × S’ representing the interaction of genotype and soil texture. Identical letters indicate no significant differences as tested using one-way ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Tukey’s test. Cross comparisons between experimental years were established using two-way ANOVA, P-values are reported in the box, with significant (P ≤ 0.05) parameters in bold. NRH represents the no root hair genotype; BRH, the bud root hair genotype; SRH, the short root hair genotype; and WT, the wild type all in the ‘Optic’ background, together with ‘Sassy’.