Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Jul 28;33(9):2633. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01939-3

Vitamin D—let common sense prevail—on the balance of probabilities

Helga Rhein 1,
PMCID: PMC8318321  PMID: 34322855

High latitude, dark skin type, overweight, inflammatory conditions, are all predisposing factors for severe vitamin D deficiency (serum 25(OH)D below 25 nmol/l) [1]. The authors of the latest rapid evidence review for vitamin D and Covid-19 [2] find the evidence not compelling enough to advise population-wide prophylactic vitamin D supplementation to prevent Covid-19 severity. They confirm, however, vitamin D’s role in immune modulatory processes. Should not therefore at least those risk groups deserve to be advised on adequate vitamin D supplementation, better even, have their serum 25(OH)D assessed?

I disagree with the authors that existing national guidance in the UK on vitamin D supplementation appears appropriate. Firstly, this guidance is not well taken up [3], secondly, it does not abolish vitamin D deficiency, it just reduces it by a small degree [4], and thirdly, it completely ignores nutritional science by advising the same dose for all (400 IU), whether for a baby or an overweight adult.

The risk groups for vitamin D deficiency and severe Covid-19 disease are overlapping. Evidence for the benefits of avoiding D-deficiency during this pandemic far outweighs the theoretical risk of overdose. Physicians and chief medical officers should urgently and pro-actively seek to abolish vitamin D deficiency, now, ahead of a third wave, rather than only wait for further trial results.

Funding

None.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Helga Rhein: Retired general practitioner

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Sutherland JP, Zhou A, Leach MJ, et al. Differences and determinants of vitamin D deficiency among UK biobank participants: a cross-ethnic and socioeconomic study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:3436–3447. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Raisi-Estabragh Z, Martineau AR, Curtis EM, et al. Vitamin D and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): rapid evidence review [published online ahead of print, 2021 Jun 12] Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01894-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Less than one third of this Scottish population sample takes vitamin D supplements. Food Standard Agency. November 2020. https://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/downloads/Vitamin_D_research_data_tables_-_for_publishing.pdf
  • 4.Zgaga L, Theodoratou E, Farrington SM, et al. Diet, environmental factors, and lifestyle underlie the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in healthy adults in Scotland, and supplementation reduces the proportion that are severely deficient. J Nutr. 2011;141:1535–1542. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.140012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES