Table 3.
Adjusted hazard ratios for invasive versus conservative strategy by renal transplant candidacy status
| No. (%) of Patients with an Event | Adj. HRa (95% CI) | P-value for Interaction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON (n=389) | INV(n=388) | |||
| Primary Outcome | ||||
| Death or non-fatal MI | 0.68 | |||
| Not Listed | 99/289 (34%) | 96/294 (33%) | 1.03 (0.78, 1.37) | |
| Listed | 30/100 (30%) | 27/94 (29%) | 0.91 (0.54, 1.54) | |
| Secondary Outcomes | ||||
| Death, non-fatal MI, Unstable angina, Heart failure, RCA or Stroke | 0.35 | |||
| Not Listed | 106/289 (37%) | 110/294 (37%) | 1.17 (0.89, 1.53) | |
| Listed | 34/100 (34%) | 31/94 (33%) | 0.89 (0.55, 1.46) | |
a
Estimated from Cox proportional hazards models of the primary and secondary composite outcomes. All models are adjusted for age, sex, kidney function, left ventricular ejection fraction, and diabetes. The hazard ratio is for the invasive-strategy group as compared with the conservative-strategy group