Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 6;20:101496. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101496

Table 1.

Outcomes of all studies identified in literature.

Study Reconstruction technique Sample size Follow up in months Functional outcome & scores (TESS, DASH, MSTS, MEPS, wherever available) Complications
Rydholm, 19873 Radius neck to humerus trochlea articulation 1 9 ROM: 35°–135° Pronosupination: 40° Muscle weakness nearly 50% of normal
Gianoutsos et al., 199411 Osteocutaneous fibular free flap 1 36 ROM: 10°–100° Pronation: 45° Supination: 35° Power: 4/5 Instability of the reconstructed joint, Donor site: leg edema
Kimura et al., 20028 Vascularized fibular graft 1 48 MSTS 100% (30/30) Nil
Weber et al., 200316 Total elbow replacement 11 elbows (1 proximal ulna tumor) 12–124 (mean – 47), Median – 37) Mean MSTS: 83% (25/30) Periprosthetic lysis
Duncan et al., 20087 Radial neck to humerus trochlea transposition 2 96
12
MSTS (Mean): 88.3% (26.5/30) Joint instability and muscle weakness
Guo et al., 200817 Total elbow arthroplasty 19 elbows (5 proximal ulna tumors) 24 MEPS:
Good in 14/19: 77.8%
Poor in 4/19: 22.2% Stem loosening, periprosthetic lysis and revision surgeries
Ogose et al., 201020 Combined vascularized fibula + osteochondral extracorporeal irradiated graft 1 120 ROM: −20°–120° Pronation: 80° Supination: 10° Proximal osteotomy site nonunion: iliac crest bone grafting at 16 months after surgery
Minhas et al., 201023 Arthrodesis with fibula 1 60 Elbow fusion Nil
Chen et al., 20129 Radius neck to humerus trochlea transposition 1 12 MSTS: 83% (25/30) ROM: 10°–90°. Slight restriction in prono-supination. Joint instability Muscle strength weakness
Sewell et al., 201218 Custom proximal ulna endoprosthetic replacement 4 85 Mean MSTS: 90% (27/30)
Mean TESS: 81 (73–88) Triceps weakness
Goyal et al., 201315 Non-vascularized fibula to remaining olecranon 1 24 ROM - 40°–130, 70° prono-supination Nil
Wang et al., 201514 Non-vascularized fibula to remaining olecranon 1 24 ROM - 0 ° to 135 °, Pronation: 30 °, Supination: 85 °. The grip power of the left hand was 36 kg, which was 86% of the contralateral side (42 kg) Nil
Kalaiah et al., 201513 Non-vascularized fibula with trans-osseous sutures 1 24 Not mentioned Not mentioned
Sulko, 201310 Radial head transposition with inverted V-plasty of triceps 1 27 MSTS: 96.67% (29/30)
DASH: zero Power: 5/5 Restricted Pronation. Limb length discrepancy: 2 cm
Puri et al., 201619 Medialization of radius to a preserved proximal articular segment of ulna 1 60 ROM: 10°–130° MSTS: 90% (27/30) Restricted prono-supination, limb length discrepancy. Implant prominence over elbow
Goyal P et al., 201625 Partial excision with soft tissue reattachment 1 60 Full ROM of elbow Nil
Sboui et al., 20171 Medialization of radius to a preserved proximal articular segment of ulna 1 36 ROM: 20°–125°, no prono-supination No prono-supination
Megas et al., 201712 Non-vascularized fibula with trans-osseous sutures 1 25 ROM: 20°–110°, supination - 30°, pronation - 40°, Mayo Elbow Score - 75 points Nil
Gundavda et al., 20196 Osteoarticular extracorporeal irradiation and reimplantation of proximal ulna resected segment 3 28–42 ROM: 0°–130° Pronosupination: full
Power: 5/5 MSTS: 100% (30/30) DASH: zero MEPS: 100 Implant prominence over the elbow in 1 case
Houdek et al., 20195 Transposition of the radial neck to the trochlea of the humerus 2 24 TESS: 87, 91.4; MSTS: 87, 83; DASH: 20.8, 24.2
ROM: 30–110° flexion & 45° of prono-supination to neutral
ROM: 30–130 & 45 pronosupination to neutral
Nil