Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 15;8:704145. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.704145

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

No. Author Year Country Study design Follow-up (Years) Sample Male (%) Age (years) Endpoints Definition of MetS
1 Anderson 2004 America Retrospective cohort study 2.80 ± 2.30 2,035 76.00 65 ± 11 ②③ NCEP2001
2 Marroquin 2004 America Prospective cohort study 3.50 (2.80–4.70) 284 0.00 58 ± 12 ①②③④⑦ NCEP2001
3 Rana 2005 Netherlands Prospective cohort study at least 0.75 901 NA 62 ± 11 ②⑤③ NCEP2005
4 Saely 2005 Australia Prospective cohort study 2.30 ± 0.40 750 67.90 62.6 ± 10.4 ②③④⑤ NCEP2001
5 Schwartz 2005 America RCT post-hoc analysis 0.33 3,038 65.00 65 ± 12 ①③⑥⑧⑩ NCEP2001
6 Zeller 2005 France Prospective cohort study 6.90 633 75.00 66.2 ①③④⑨ NCEP2001
7 Aguilar 2006 America, New England, Canada RCT post-hoc analysis 3.10 3,319 81.70 62 ± 11 ①③⑤⑧ NCEP2001
8 Boulon 2006 France Prospective cohort study 1.60 480 82.20 61.6 ± 13 ①④⑤⑦ NCEP2001,IDF
9 Briand 2006 Canada Retrospective cohort study 2.30 ± 1.10 105 62.00 69 ± 12 NCEP2001
10 Hu 2006 China Retrospective cohort study 2.30 ± 1.00 2,596 77.70 60.3 ± 10.3 ②③④⑤⑦ IDF
11 Kasai 2006 Janpan Retrospective cohort study 12.00 ± 3.60 748 87.00 59 ± 10 ①②⑩ NCEP2001
12 Nigam 2006 Canada Retrospective cohort study 12.60 ± 5.10 24,958 75.60 52.9 ± 9.3 ①③④⑦ NCEP2001
13 Ovbiagele 2006 America RCT post-hoc analysis 1.80 476 61.60 63 ± 11.4 ②③④⑩ NCEP2001
14 Espinola-Klein 2007 Germany Retrospective cohort study 6.70 811 75.10 62.7 ± 9.3 ②③④ NCEP2005
15 Hajer 2007 Netherlands Prospective cohort study 2.80 (0.10–7.50) 2,060 78.00 59.6 ± 10.3 ②④ NCEP2001
16 Nakatani 2007 Janpan Prospective cohort study 2.00 3,858 76.00 64.7 ± 11.4 ②③ NCEP2001
17 Canibus 2007 Italy Prospective cohort study 1.00 148 79.70 61 ± 11 ②⑤ NCEP2001
18 Espinola-Klein 2007 Germany Prospective cohort study 6.10 (0.70–7.70) 1,263 74.40 61.6 ± 10.1 NCEP2005
19 Iturry-Yamamoto 2009 Brazil Prospective cohort study 1.00 159 71.70 60.7 ± 10.6 ②③⑤ NCEP2005
20 Kasai 2009 Janpan Retrospective cohort study 11.40 ± 2.90 1,836 85.10 59.2 ± 9.0 ①②④⑩ NCEP2005
21 Protack 2009 America Retrospective cohort study 4.50 921 64.00 71 ± 10 ②③④ Custom
22 Selcuk 2009 Turkey Prospective cohort study 2.30 (1.20–3.50) 188 82.40 56.9 ± 11.6 ②③⑤ NCEP2005
23 Solymoss 2009 Canada Retrospective cohort study 12.60 ± 3.40 1,080 73.40 58.1 ± 9.8 ①②③④⑧ NCEP2005
24 Suwaidi 2010 Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen Prospective cohort study 0.50 6,701 75.70 56.4 ± 12.2 ①③④⑦ NCEP2005
25 Lee 2010 Korea Prospective cohort study 1.00 1,990 73.00 63.4 ± 12.6 ①②③⑤ NCEP2005
26 Miller 2010 Mexico Prospective cohort study / 971 70.00 62.3 ± 11.5 ①⑤⑦ NCEP2005
27 Petersen 2010 America Prospective cohort study 5.00 5,744 64.60 62(53–71) ①③④⑩ NCEP2005
28 Van Kuijk 2010 Netherlands Retrospective cohort study 6.00 (2.00–9.00) 2,069 81.40 / ②③⑤⑩ NCEP2001
29 Hoshida 2011 Janpan Prospective cohort study 1.00 1,173 72.50 67 ①②③④⑤ NCEP2005
30 Hu 2011 China Prospective cohort study 2.95 1,224 71.70 60 ± 10 ②③ IDF
31 Kalahasti 2011 America Retrospective cohort study 1.00 2,362 73.00 64 ①③⑤⑩ Custom
32 Maron 2011 America RCT post-hoc analysis 4.60 (2.50–7.00) 2,248 85.10 62.1 ± 9.9 ①③⑤⑦⑩ NCEP2005
33 Capoulade 2012 Canada Prospective cohort study 3.40 ± 1.30 243 62.00 57 ± 13 NCEP2001
34 Marso 2012 Netherlands Prospective cohort study 3.00 673 75.80 58.2(50.1–70.8) ②③⑧ NCEP2001
35 Mi 2012 China Prospective cohort study 1.00 701 64.80 61.4 ± 11.7 ①④⑩ IDF
36 Arnold 2013 America Prospective cohort study 1.00 1,129 66.00 59.7 ± 11.6 NCEP2001
37 Balti 2013 France Prospective cohort study 5.00 57 56.00 61.9 ± 12.9 NCEP2005
38 Hossain 2014 Bangladesh Prospective cohort study 1.00 210 70.00 53.2 ± 12 ①④⑥⑨ NCEP2005
39 Mehta 2014 New England, Canada, America, Australian RCT post-hoc analysis 1.00 9,406 68.40 68(60–75) NCEP2005
40 Mornar 2014 Croatia Prospective cohort study 1.00 250 / / ②③ NCEP2005
41 Udell 2014 America Prospective cohort study 4.00 44,548 64.60 68.7 ± 10.4 ①②③④ NCEP2005
42 Won 2014 Korea Prospective cohort study 3.00 963 75.60 62 ± 12 ①②③⑩ NCEP2005
43 Ao 2015 China Retrospective cohort study 5.00 1,238 84.40 59.5 ± 9 ①③④ NCEP2005
44 Arbel 2015 Russia Prospective cohort study 4.40 ± 1.90 3,525 72.00 66 ± 22 NCEP2005
45 Fan 2015 China Retrospective cohort study 2.30 997 69.90 64.29 ± 13.13 ⑦① Custom
46 Perrone-Filardi 2015 Italy Substudy of RCT 3.00 6,648 78.20 67.2 ± 10.6 ①②⑩ IDF
47 Simao 2015 Brazil Retrospective cohort study 1.00 148 56.80 69.5(55–81.5) NCEP2005
48 Chen 2016 China Prospective cohort study 4.90 3,351 63.00 64 ± 2.4 ①②⑩ NCEP2005
49 Fang 2016 China Prospective cohort study 3.40 1,087 51.20 65.1 ± 8.9 ②③④ Custom
50 La Carrubba 2016 Italy Prospective cohort study 1.80 1,920 56.30 60(50–69) ②③④⑤ IDF
51 Tadaki 2016 Janpan Retrospective cohort study 3.20 ± 1.10 4,566 68.00 68.8 ± 1.4 ①③⑤⑧ NCEP2001
52 Bhagat 2017 2017 Indian Prospective cohort study 2.00 358 74.90 56.19 ± 11.56 ①⑧⑨ NCEP2005
53 Lovic 2018 Serbia Prospective cohort study 4.00 507 77.71 58.57 ± 11.30 ①②③④⑤ AHA-NHLBI(NCEP2005), NCEP2001 and IDF
54 Vest 2018 USA Prospective cohort study 5.10 (2.20–8.20) 1,953 74.00 55 (48–63) NCEP2001
55 Polovina 2018 Serbia Prospective cohort study 5.00 843 61.40 62.5 ± 12.2 ②③⑩ NCEP2005

① All-cause death, ② CV death, ③ MI, ④ Stroke, ⑤ TVR, ⑥ Cardiac arrest, ⑦ HF, ⑧ Angina pectoris, ⑨ Cardiogenic shock, ⑩ MetS components.