Table 2.
Differences in app engagement by participants’ characteristics (N=41).
| Characteristics | Low app user (0-6 total check-ins; n=18), n (%) | High app user (7-8 total check-ins; n=23), n (%) | Unadjusted ORa (95% CI) for high app engagement | Adjusted OR (95% CI) for high app engagementb | |||||||
| Baseline characteristics | |||||||||||
|
|
Sex | N/Ac | |||||||||
|
|
|
Female | 16 (89) | 15 (65) | Reference |
|
|||||
|
|
|
Male | 2 (11) | 8 (35) | 4.27 (0.78-23.4) |
|
|||||
|
|
Age (years) | N/A | |||||||||
|
|
|
20-39 | 5 (28) | 2 (9) | Reference |
|
|||||
|
|
|
40-59 | 10 (56) | 13 (57) | 3.25 (0.52-20.37) |
|
|||||
|
|
|
60-79 | 3 (17) | 8 (35) | 6.67 (0.81-54.96) |
|
|||||
|
|
Health tracking | ||||||||||
|
|
|
Does not track health | 3 (17) | 4 (17) | Reference | Reference | |||||
|
|
|
Tracks health manually | 7 (39) | 9 (39) | 0.96 (0.16-5.80) | 1.21 (0.15-9.48) | |||||
|
|
|
Tracks health with technology | 8 (44) | 10 (43) | 0.94 (0.16-5.46) | 2.89 (0.31-26.71) | |||||
| Postuse characteristics | |||||||||||
|
|
Filled out an exit survey | ||||||||||
|
|
|
No | 6 (33) | 1 (4) | Reference | Reference | |||||
|
|
|
Yes | 12 (67) | 22 (96) | 11 (1.18-102.4)d | 6.11 (0.59-63.3) | |||||
|
|
Thought app was too complex (n=34) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
No | 8 (75) | 21 (95) | Reference | Reference | |||||
|
|
|
Yes | 4 (25) | 1 (5) | 0.10 (0.01-0.99)d | 0.10 (0.01-1.15) | |||||
|
|
Thought app was too simplistic (n=34) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
No | 11 (92) | 18 (82) | Reference | Reference | |||||
|
|
|
Yes | 1 (8) | 4 (18) | 2.44 (0.24-24.8) | 1.49 (0.12-17.7) | |||||
aOR: odds ratio.
bAdjusted for sex and age (as a continuous variable).
cN/A: not applicable.
dStatistically significant result at P<.05.