Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 15;12:705284. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.705284

TABLE 4.

In silico analysis, allele frequency, and classification of untypical NOTHC3 variants.

Variant In silico analysis
Frequency in GnomAD GOM deposit in biopsy Classificationa
SIFT PolyPhen-2 Mutation taster GERP++
R75P 0.132 0.987 0.961 5.13 <0.001 Positive* PV
Tolerated Probably damaging Polymorphism Conserve
R133S 0.662 0.033 1.000 5.02 <0.001 Positive PV
Tolerated Benign Disease causing Conserve
V237M 0.002 0.908 1.000 5.44 <0.001 NP VUS
Damaging Probably damaging Disease causing Conserve
R607H 0.576 0.006 0.977 4.51 <0.001 Positive PV
Tolerated Benign Disease causing Conserve
R1100H 0.120 0.056 1.000 5.08 <0.001 NP VUS
Tolerated Benign Disease causing Conserve
G1347R 0.008 0.978 1.000 4.48 <0.001 Positive* PV
Damaging Probably damaging Disease causing Conserve
R1761H 0.014 1.000 1.000 4.26 <0.001 Positive* PV
Damaging Deleterious Disease causing Conserve
V1922L 0.202 1.000 1.000 5.14 <0.001 NP VUS
Tolerated Deleterious Disease causing Conserve
S2203Y 0.037 0.978 0.698 5.14 <0.001 NP VUS
Damaging Probably damaging Disease causing Conserve

*GOM-positive reported in literature; NP, not performed. aClassification following the consensus statement of NOTCH3 variants causing CADASIL: pathogenic variant (PV) and variant of unknown significance (VUS).