Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;3(4):100323. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100323

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Rationale for SMFI development.

(A) Illustration of rationale behind SMFI development; (B) whole SMD and SMDpsoas; and (C) SMFI and SMFIpsoas in patients with low LS vs. those with high LS (2-tailed Student’s t test, n = 48). All data are mean ± SD. Significant differences are considered at p <0.05. CT, computed tomography; HU, Hounsfield unit; LS, liver stiffness; SMD, skeletal muscle density; SMDpsoas, psoas muscle density; SMFI, skeletal muscle fat index; SMFIpsoas, psoas fat index.