Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 29;4:927. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02444-z

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics for mAb1 and mAb2 structures.

mAb1 full complex mAb1 mAb1 mAb2 full complex
2 trimers:3 mAbs Masked 2 trimers:2 mAbs 2 trimers:3 mAbs
(EMDB-23293) (−) (EMDB-23295) (EMDB-23296)
(PDB 7LEX) (−) (PDB 7LEZ) (PDB 7LF0)
Data collection and processing
 Magnification 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000
 Voltage (kV) 300 300 300 300
 Electron exposure (e–/Å2) 45.46 45.46 45.46 44.32
 Defocus range (μm) −1.0 to −1.8 −1.0 to −1.8 −1.0 to −1.8 −1.2 to −2.0
 Pixel size (Å) 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
 Symmetry imposed C3 C3 C1 C3
 Initial particle images (no.) 94,796 94,796 94,796 52,550
 Final particle images (no.) 37,385 77,986 16,810 52,550
 Map resolution (Å) 3.6 3.4 4.1 3.7
   FSC threshold 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143
Refinement
 Initial model used (PDB code) 6V7C 6V7C 6V7C 6V7C
 Model resolution (Å) 3.6 3.5 4.3 3.8
   FSC threshold 0.5 0.5 0.5
 Map sharpening B factor (Å2) 106.7 134.6 77.9 109.7
Model composition
   Non-hydrogen atoms 25,662 25,662 21,628 25,797
   Protein residues 4554 4554 3654 4542
   Ligands 0 0 0 0
 B factors (Å2)
   Protein 76.2 118.8 224.2 56.6
   Ligand
R.m.s. deviations
   Bond lengths (Å) 0.009 0.011 0.007 0.010
   Bond angles (°) 1.00 1.09 1.14 1.07
  Validation
   MolProbity score 1.89 1.96 2.14 2.03
   Clashscore 6.42 6.9 11.4 7.5
   Poor rotamers (%) 0.31 0.78 0.65 1.09
  Ramachandran plot
   Favored (%) 90.4 89.3 89.2 87.8
   Allowed (%) 8.7 9.8 10.1 11.4
   Disallowed (%) 0.89 0.89 0.66 0.80

For mAb1, the full complex was not refined in Phenix. For the other complexes, the relatively low values for the CC Mask, Volume and Peaks observed for the refinement of the full complex reflect the high degree of variability in the resolution range.