Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 17;77:105668. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105668

Table 1.

Protein content and microbial quality of skim milk subjected to different processing methods.

Protein concentration (mg/mL) Bacteria count (log CFU/mL) Coliform (log CFU/mL) Spores (log CFU/mL)
S 36.0 ± 0.4a 6.16 ± 0.02d 2.42 ± 0.16 3.69 ± 0.01a
HTST 35.7 ± 0.2a 4.02 ± 0.09c ND 3.64 ± 0.01a
MF 35.2 ± 0.1a 2.46 ± 0.02b ND ND
MUS1 34.2 ± 0.3a 1.73 ± 0.04a ND ND
MUS2 34.0 ± 1.0a ND ND ND
MUS3 33.8 ± 0.9a ND ND ND

S: skim milk, HTST: HTST pasteurization, MF: microfiltration, MUS1, MUS2 and MUS3 represent microfiltration combination with ultrasonication (with energy density of 432, 1296 and 2160 J/mL) respectively. Different letters in the same column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).