Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 16;12:704329. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.704329

Table 4.

Overview of recent studies evaluating stent retrievers.

Primary used stent retriever Number of patients First-pass reperfusion rate (%) Final reperfusion rate (%)
mTICI ≥2b ≥2c ≥2b ≥2c
Trevo 2000 Registry (7, 13) Trevo XP 2,008 - 27.8% 92.8% 56.4%a
Yi et al. (14) Trevo XP 98 40.8% 89.7%
Solitaire 102 32% 82.3%
ARISE II (15) EmboTrap I and II 227 51.5% 40% 92.5% 76%
Ribo et al. (16) Neva thrombectomy device 30 63% 47% 93% 63%
Velioglu et al. (17) CatchView thrombectomy device 53 47.2% - 84.9% -
Gupta et al. (18) Tigertriever 160 57.8% - 95.7% 71.8%
Kurre et al. (19) pREset stent retriever 271 - - 84.9% -
ARTESp (20) pREset stent retriever 100 - - 85.3% -
Kaschner et al. (21) Aperio thrombectomy device 97 43.9% 15.1% 85.3% 54.8%
Kaschner et al. (22) Aperio Hybrid stent retriever 48 52.1% 31.3% 95.8% 60.4%
Pfaff et al. (23) Solitaire Platinum stent retriever 75 38.6% 92%
Our study Trevo NXT ProVue retriever 80 63.75% 53.75% 96.25% 82.5%
a

Refers to mTICI 3 results.

mTICI, modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction.