Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 6;73(3):319–324. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.01.009

Table 2.

Follow-up data, outcomes and predictors.

Echo data - 6 months
Univariate regression^
Multivariate regression^
Variable mean (SD) β OR (95% CI) P β OR (95% CI) p
LV-EDVi∗ 44.4 (4.1) 0.18 1.2 (1–1.4) <0.01 0.08 1.05 (0.7–1.2) 0.12
LV-ESVi∗ 22.1 (3.8) 0.13 1.1 (1–1.6) 0.01 0.05 1.02 (0.4–1.5) 0.23
LAVi∗ 22.7 (2.7) 0.23 1.3 (1.1–1.5) <0.01 0.12 1.18 (1.1–1.9) 0.04
LVEF (%) 50.3 (4.5) −0.36 0.7 (0.5–0.9) <0.01 −0.15 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 0.09
Mitral E/A 1.6 (0.3) −0.35 0.7 (0.2–1.8) 0.46
RVFAC (%) 42.2 (3.5) −0.29 0.7 (0.6–0.9) <0.01 −0.21 0.7 (0.5–0.9) 0.02
Outcomes
Univariate regression
Endpoints N (%) Variable β OR (95% CI) p
Death 2 (4.7%) Bromocriptine (yes = 1)# −0.49 0.6 (0.1–2.2) 0.44
poor LV recovery 11 (25.6%) postpartum Δ (yes = 1) 0.27 1.3 (0.3–5.3) 0.70
re-hospitalization 4 (9.3%) Age (1unit = 1) 0.08 1.1 (0.8–1.4) 0.56
Composite 14 (32.5%) HTN-CD (yes = 1) 1.24 3.4 (0.7–15.9) 0.10
Full LV recovery 26 (60.5%) Inotropic therapy (yes: 1) 0.82 2.2 (0.4–12.5) 0.31
Partial LV recovery 4 (9.3%) Parity −0.03 0.9 (0.4–2.1) 0.93

∗in ml/m2; ^ with at presentation data; Δ: diagnosis; # of 35 patients discharged with bromocriptine only 19 patients used the drug for >/ = 1 week (54% adherence) and remaining (16/35) did-not used bromocriptine though prescribed; so, these 16 patients (prescribed but not used) and 5 patients (not prescribed) were taken as control (total = 21 [No = 0]) and remaining patients (19: during follow-up and 3: within hospital) were regarded as study group (total = 22 [Yes = 1]: mean duration of use - 2.2 weeks).