Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 5;9(2):90–95. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.11.003

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical characteristics of patients who initially underwent RP versus those who underwent RP after termination of AS.

Initially underwent RP RP after termination of AS P
No. of patients 58 20
Age (y) 67.0 ± 5.7 66.0 ± 4.5 0.571
Charlson comorbidity index (≥2) 11 (19.00) 3 (15.0) 0.723
Family history 4 (6.9) 2 (10.0) 0.655
PSA (ng/mL) 5.7 ± 1.8 6.4 ± 3.1 0.615
Prostate volume (cc) 41.6 ± 16.6 40.3 ± 11.7 0.864
PSA density (ng/mL/cc) 0.15 ± 0.07 0.17 ± 0.08 0.672
Gleason Grade group 2 12 (20.7) 3 (15.0) 0.580
Clinical stage (cT2) 10 (17.2) 5 (25.0) 0.452
No. of positive biopsy cores 1.4 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 0.026
% of maximum core involvement (≤50) 17.4 ± 14.0 11.7 ± 15.6 0.007
Incidental PCa after TURP 0 (0.0) 4 (20.0) 0.001
% of positive biopsy chips 7.6 ± 11.6
Follow-up duration (mo) 47.4 ± 28.7 51.2 ± 24.8 0.563
AS adherence duration (mo) 23.7 ± 15.7
Risk stratification (FI) 8 (13.8) 6 (30.0) 0.035
Pathologic stage (pT3) 2 (3.4) 3 (15.0) 0.183
pathologic Gleason Grade group 2 24 (41.4) 9 (45.0) 0.660
Tumor volume (cc) 1.0 ± 1.0 1.2 ± 1.4 0.362
No. of significant PCa 31.0 (53.4) 15 (75.0) 0.093
No. of upgrading 2 (3.4) 3 (15.0) 0.303
No. of upstaging 16 (27.6) 8 (40.0) 0.071
No. of upgrading or upstaging 17 (29.3) 10 (50.0) 0.096

Data are n (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

AS, active surveillance; FI, favorable intermediate; PCa, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; RP, radical prostatectomy; TURP, transurethral resection of prostate.