Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 5;9(2):90–95. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.11.003

Table 4.

Comparison of clinical characteristics of patients who underwent AS according to diagnostic methods.

AS after PBx AS after TURP P
No. of patients 83 39
Age (yr) 69.1 ± 7.4 73.5 ± 8.5 0.022
Charlson comorbidity index (≥2) 6 (7.2) 2 (5.1) 0.663
Family history 1 (1.2) 2 (5.1) 0.194
PSA (ng/mL) 5.9 ± 3.0 4.3 ± 3.2 0.004
Prostate volume (cc) 45.6 ± 18.5 49.5 ± 20.0 0.249
PSA density (ng/mL/cc) 0.14 ± 0.08 0.09 ± 0.07 <0.001
Gleason Grade group 0.126
 1 76 (91.6) 32 (82.1)
 2 7 (8.4) 7 (18.9)
Clinical stage 0.144
 cT1c 60 (72.3)
 cT1a 30 (77.0)
 cT1b 3 (7.6)
 cT2 23 (27.7) 6 (15.4)
No. of positive biopsy cores <0.001
 1 75 (90.4) 3 (7.7)
 2 8 (9.6) 1 (2.6)
Maximum percentage involvement <0.001
 ≤50% 81 (97.6) 1 (2.6)
 >50% 2 (2.4) 1 (2.6)
% of positive biopsy chips 4.9 ± 6.2
Risk stratification 0.959
 Very low 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Low 65 (78.3) 28 (71.8)
 Favorable intermediate 16 (19.3) 10 (25.6)
 Unfavorable intermediate 2 (2.4) 1 (2.6)
Follow-up duration (mo) 41.3 (25.7–57.7) 52.2 (29.1–84.3) 0.047
AS adherence duration (mo) 28.5 (16.0–46.2) 41.3 (27.9–71.6) 0.001
Termination of AS 51 (61.4) 19 (48.7) >0.999

Data are n (%), mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range).

AS, active surveillance; PBx, prostate biopsy; PSA, Prostate-specific antigen; RP, radical prostatectomy; TURP, transurethral resection of prostate.