Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 12;14(8):1894–1900. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa220

Table 1.

Summary of included studies

Studya N Intervention versus control Study design Follow-up (months) Age (years) Male sex (%) De novo MM (%) Previous CKDb (%) Chemotherapy regimen intervention/ control
Hutchison et al. [20] (2019, UK, Germany) 90 HCO-HD versus HF-HD RCT 24 65.5 57 100 4.4 BTZ + DOX + DEX/ BTZ + DOX + DEX
Bridoux et al. [19] (2017, France) 98 HCO-HD versus HF-HD RCT 48 68.8 55 100 11.7 BTZ + DEX/BTZ + DEX
Gerth et al. [25] (2016, Germany) 59 HCO-HD versus HF-HD Retrospective cohort 12 63.1 50.8 54 27.1 Novel agentsc 76.2%/novel agents 23.5%
Curti et al. [24] (2016, Switzerland) 19 HCO-HD versus HF-HD Retrospective cohort 72.7 63.0 73,7 83 NR BTZ + DEX/BTZ + DEXd
Peters et al. [23] (2011, France) 10 HCO-HD versus HD Retrospective cohort 12.9 71 50 100 NR BTZ + DEX/BTZ + DEX or DEX + MPT or DEX

DOX, doxorubicin; DEX, dexamethasone; MPT, melphalan; NR, not reported.

a

Year of publication and setting (country or region) provided in parentheses.

b

CKD is defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2.

c

BTZ, thalidomide or lenalidomide.

d

Other additional chemotherapy agents were administered to some patients.