Table 1.
Author (year) | Number of studies included | aType of Review | Focus of Systematic Review/ Meta-Analysis | Setting | bStudy Type | cStrategies | dOutcomes | eQuality Rating (Total Score) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ploeg et al. (2009) | 8 | SR | Abuse of persons 60 years and older | Community-based, hospital, mental health centers, social work aging services/social services, state abuse among older adults demonstration programs | RCT, pre-post | E, P, F, C, O | E, P, S, F, N, O | Strong (7) |
Alt et al. (2011) | 14 | SR | Educational programs for allied health professionals, aging service providers and first responders, nurses, care assistants and social workers | Community-based, nursing home, hospital | RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, survey | E, C, O | O | Strong (7) |
Wang et al. (2015) | 10 | SR | General elder population | Community-based, nursing home, forensic centers/Adult Protective Services, dementia clinic | non-RCT, pre-post | E, P, O | E, P, F, N, R, O | Strong (7) |
Ayalon et al. (2016) | 24 | SR & MA | General elder population | Community-based, nursing home, hospital, university setting, long-term care facility, group-dwelling units for people with dementia, psychogeriatric wards, municipalities | RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, group comparison | E, P, Ml, F, C, O | E, P, N, R | Strong (7) |
Baker et al. (2016) & Baker et al. (2017) | 7 | SR | Reduce or prevent abuse among older adults in their home, in organizational or institutional and community settings | Community-based, nursing home, university setting, home health care organizations, state government department for the aging, neurological outpatient dementia service, housing projects, institution | RCT, controlled before- and-after | E, P, O | E, N, O | Strong (7) |
fHirst et al. (2016) | 23 Education Needed to Effectively Address Abuse & Neglect of Older Adults | SR | Nurses and health care providers | Nursing home, long-term care facility | RCT, mixed methods, cross-sectional | E, C | O | Moderate (5) |
10 Prevention & Health Promotion Strategies | SR | Older adult, the abusive caregiver, and the public | Faith-based organization | non-RCT, cross-sectional | E, O | E, O | ||
Day et al. (2017) | 8 | SR | Elder abuse victims (60 years and older) | Community-based, university setting, long-term care facility, dental office, in-home assessment of Adult Protective Services, Forensic Center | RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, qualitative methods, referrals to program | E, P, F, C, O | E, P, S, F, N, O | Strong (6) |
Fearing et al. (2017) | 9 | SR | Community-based older adults at-risk for abuse (dementia patients) | Community-based, clinical | RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, mixed method, surveys, interviews, observations, retrospective secondary data analysis/national e-survey | E, P, Ml, O | E, P, F, N, O | Strong (7) |
gMoore and Browne (2017) | 28 Evidence-Based Practices | SR | Perpetrators, professionals, people who care for older persons, education for older adults | Community-based, hospital, long-term care facility, community mental health centers | RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, non-experimental | E, P, F, C, O | E, P, S, F, N, O | Moderate (4) |
22 Best Practices | SR | Professionals (Adult Protective Service workers, nurses, case managers) | Long-term care facility | Non-experimental | E, O | O | ||
Mohd Mydin et al. (2019)h | 13 | SR | Elders in primary health-care providers (physicians, nurses, medical assistants, allied health, midwife, pharmacist, dentist, social workers) | Community-based, nursing home, hospital, university setting, physician offices | RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, case control, cohort & cross-sectional | E, C | F,0 | Strong (7) |
Rosen, Elman, et al. (2019) | 116 | SR | Abuse and neglect programs for older adults in acute-care hospitals and low resource environments | Community-based, nursing home, hospital, university setting, law enforcement/legal/ district attorney’s office/court, victim’s home/telephone, Adult Protective Service | RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, case series, mixed methods, nonequivalent comparison group, & cross-sectional | E, P, F, C, O | E, P, S, F, N | Strong (6) |
SR = Systematic Review; MA = Meta-Analysis
RCT = Randomized control trial
E = Educational; P = Psychoeducational; MI = Motivational interviewing; F = Family based; C = Clinician/provider; O = Other (e.g., case management, legal services, social support)
E = Emotional/Psychological abuse; P = Physical abuse; S = Sexual abuse; F = Financial abuse/Exploitation; N = Neglect; R = Restraint; O = Other (e.g., abandonment, medical abuse, resident-to-resident abuse/aggression)
The Quality Assessment Tool for Reviews was used to assess the quality of each review (Micucci et al., 2002; Thomas et al., 2005). This tool comprises seven questions coded as “yes,” “no,” or “unknown/undetermined.” Based on the coding, each review was rated as strong (total score 6–7), moderate (total score 4–5) or weak (total score 3 or less)
The studies included are not mutually exclusive. An additional 58 studies did not have outcome data and are not reported.
An additional 17 emerging/innovative practices did not have outcome data and are not reported.
The 13 studies include 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies.