Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Elder Abuse Negl. 2020 Sep 21;32(5):409–433. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2020.1819926

Table 1.

Characteristics of Eleven Systematic Reviews to Prevent or Stop Abuse and Neglect among Older Adults.

Author (year) Number of studies included aType of Review Focus of Systematic Review/ Meta-Analysis Setting bStudy Type cStrategies dOutcomes eQuality Rating (Total Score)
Ploeg et al. (2009) 8 SR Abuse of persons 60 years and older Community-based, hospital, mental health centers, social work aging services/social services, state abuse among older adults demonstration programs RCT, pre-post E, P, F, C, O E, P, S, F, N, O Strong (7)
Alt et al. (2011) 14 SR Educational programs for allied health professionals, aging service providers and first responders, nurses, care assistants and social workers Community-based, nursing home, hospital RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, survey E, C, O O Strong (7)
Wang et al. (2015) 10 SR General elder population Community-based, nursing home, forensic centers/Adult Protective Services, dementia clinic non-RCT, pre-post E, P, O E, P, F, N, R, O Strong (7)
Ayalon et al. (2016) 24 SR & MA General elder population Community-based, nursing home, hospital, university setting, long-term care facility, group-dwelling units for people with dementia, psychogeriatric wards, municipalities RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, group comparison E, P, Ml, F, C, O E, P, N, R Strong (7)
Baker et al. (2016) & Baker et al. (2017) 7 SR Reduce or prevent abuse among older adults in their home, in organizational or institutional and community settings Community-based, nursing home, university setting, home health care organizations, state government department for the aging, neurological outpatient dementia service, housing projects, institution RCT, controlled before- and-after E, P, O E, N, O Strong (7)
fHirst et al. (2016) 23 Education Needed to Effectively Address Abuse & Neglect of Older Adults SR Nurses and health care providers Nursing home, long-term care facility RCT, mixed methods, cross-sectional E, C O Moderate (5)
10 Prevention & Health Promotion Strategies SR Older adult, the abusive caregiver, and the public Faith-based organization non-RCT, cross-sectional E, O E, O
Day et al. (2017) 8 SR Elder abuse victims (60 years and older) Community-based, university setting, long-term care facility, dental office, in-home assessment of Adult Protective Services, Forensic Center RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, qualitative methods, referrals to program E, P, F, C, O E, P, S, F, N, O Strong (6)
Fearing et al. (2017) 9 SR Community-based older adults at-risk for abuse (dementia patients) Community-based, clinical RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, mixed method, surveys, interviews, observations, retrospective secondary data analysis/national e-survey E, P, Ml, O E, P, F, N, O Strong (7)
gMoore and Browne (2017) 28 Evidence-Based Practices SR Perpetrators, professionals, people who care for older persons, education for older adults Community-based, hospital, long-term care facility, community mental health centers RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, non-experimental E, P, F, C, O E, P, S, F, N, O Moderate (4)
22 Best Practices SR Professionals (Adult Protective Service workers, nurses, case managers) Long-term care facility Non-experimental E, O O
Mohd Mydin et al. (2019)h 13 SR Elders in primary health-care providers (physicians, nurses, medical assistants, allied health, midwife, pharmacist, dentist, social workers) Community-based, nursing home, hospital, university setting, physician offices RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, case control, cohort & cross-sectional E, C F,0 Strong (7)
Rosen, Elman, et al. (2019) 116 SR Abuse and neglect programs for older adults in acute-care hospitals and low resource environments Community-based, nursing home, hospital, university setting, law enforcement/legal/ district attorney’s office/court, victim’s home/telephone, Adult Protective Service RCT, non-RCT, pre-post, case series, mixed methods, nonequivalent comparison group, & cross-sectional E, P, F, C, O E, P, S, F, N Strong (6)
a

SR = Systematic Review; MA = Meta-Analysis

b

RCT = Randomized control trial

c

E = Educational; P = Psychoeducational; MI = Motivational interviewing; F = Family based; C = Clinician/provider; O = Other (e.g., case management, legal services, social support)

d

E = Emotional/Psychological abuse; P = Physical abuse; S = Sexual abuse; F = Financial abuse/Exploitation; N = Neglect; R = Restraint; O = Other (e.g., abandonment, medical abuse, resident-to-resident abuse/aggression)

e

The Quality Assessment Tool for Reviews was used to assess the quality of each review (Micucci et al., 2002; Thomas et al., 2005). This tool comprises seven questions coded as “yes,” “no,” or “unknown/undetermined.” Based on the coding, each review was rated as strong (total score 6–7), moderate (total score 4–5) or weak (total score 3 or less)

f

The studies included are not mutually exclusive. An additional 58 studies did not have outcome data and are not reported.

g

An additional 17 emerging/innovative practices did not have outcome data and are not reported.

h

The 13 studies include 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies.